Using Twitter to Compare Attitudes Towards Schizophrenia and Psychosis: Investigating the Prevalence of Stigma

Claire Thirkettle, Sheri Oduola, Lucy McEntegart, Peter Beazley
{"title":"Using Twitter to Compare Attitudes Towards Schizophrenia and Psychosis: Investigating the Prevalence of Stigma","authors":"Claire Thirkettle,&nbsp;Sheri Oduola,&nbsp;Lucy McEntegart,&nbsp;Peter Beazley","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Schizophrenia remains one of the most stigmatized psychiatric diagnoses. It has been argued that the condition requires renaming. Psychosis is often used as an alternative term in UK clinical practice. We explored the prevalence of stigmatizing attitudes towards schizophrenia and psychosis using Twitter. Quantitative content analysis was used to analyze Tweets (<i>n</i> = 423) containing the terms “psychosis,” “psychotic,” “schizophrenia,” or “schizophrenic.” Tweets were categorized according to the presence and type of stigma. Both schizophrenia and psychosis were frequently stigmatized on Twitter. However, Tweets using the terms psychosis/tic were significantly more likely to contain stigmatizing attitudes (70.9%, <i>n</i> = 151) than Tweets using the terms schizophrenia/c (42.4%, <i>n</i> = 89; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Adjective terms were significantly more commonly stigmatized (76.6%, <i>n</i> = 164) than nouns (36.4%, <i>n</i> = 76; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The term “psychotic” was frequently used pejoratively. Both “schizophrenia” and “psychosis” are associated with high levels of stigma on Twitter. If schizophrenia is to be renamed, psychosis may not be a suitable replacement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.70026","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.70026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia remains one of the most stigmatized psychiatric diagnoses. It has been argued that the condition requires renaming. Psychosis is often used as an alternative term in UK clinical practice. We explored the prevalence of stigmatizing attitudes towards schizophrenia and psychosis using Twitter. Quantitative content analysis was used to analyze Tweets (n = 423) containing the terms “psychosis,” “psychotic,” “schizophrenia,” or “schizophrenic.” Tweets were categorized according to the presence and type of stigma. Both schizophrenia and psychosis were frequently stigmatized on Twitter. However, Tweets using the terms psychosis/tic were significantly more likely to contain stigmatizing attitudes (70.9%, n = 151) than Tweets using the terms schizophrenia/c (42.4%, n = 89; p < 0.001). Adjective terms were significantly more commonly stigmatized (76.6%, n = 164) than nouns (36.4%, n = 76; p < 0.001). The term “psychotic” was frequently used pejoratively. Both “schizophrenia” and “psychosis” are associated with high levels of stigma on Twitter. If schizophrenia is to be renamed, psychosis may not be a suitable replacement.

Abstract Image

使用Twitter比较对精神分裂症和精神病的态度:调查耻辱的流行
精神分裂症仍然是最容易被污名化的精神病诊断之一。有人认为这种情况需要重命名。在英国临床实践中,精神病经常被用作替代术语。我们探讨了使用Twitter对精神分裂症和精神病的污名化态度的普遍性。定量内容分析用于分析包含“精神病”、“精神病患者”、“精神分裂症”或“精神分裂症”等术语的tweet (n = 423)。根据耻辱的存在和类型对推文进行分类。在推特上,精神分裂症和精神病都经常被污名化。然而,使用精神病/抽搐这一术语的推文比使用精神分裂症/c这一术语的推文更有可能包含污名化的态度(70.9%,n = 151)。p < 0.001)。形容词术语被污名化的比例(76.6%,n = 164)显著高于名词(36.4%,n = 76);p < 0.001)。“精神病”这个词经常被贬义地使用。“精神分裂症”和“精神病”都与推特上的高度耻辱有关。如果精神分裂症要重新命名,精神病可能不是一个合适的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信