Occupational Disparities in Cancer Survival Among the Working Population in Japan: 10-Year Survival Analysis Using the Kanagawa Cancer Registry

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-03 DOI:10.1002/cam4.71020
Kazuhiko Watanabe, Ichiro Kawachi, Masayoshi Zaitsu
{"title":"Occupational Disparities in Cancer Survival Among the Working Population in Japan: 10-Year Survival Analysis Using the Kanagawa Cancer Registry","authors":"Kazuhiko Watanabe,&nbsp;Ichiro Kawachi,&nbsp;Masayoshi Zaitsu","doi":"10.1002/cam4.71020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Limited data exist on occupational disparities in long-term cancer mortality among the working-age population in Japan. We examined occupational disparities in long-term cancer survival, focusing on 10-year survival outcomes among working-age populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective observational study used data from the Kanagawa Cancer Registry of 41,632 patients with cancer aged 20–65 years who were diagnosed between 1992 and 2015, with a 10-year follow-up. Patients were classified into four occupational classes based on their longest-held occupations (upper nonmanual, lower nonmanual, manual, and primary industry). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and cancer-specific mortality was the secondary outcome. Poisson regression was used to estimate the mortality rate ratios (MRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each occupational class, adjusted for sex, age, and year of diagnosis. Additional analyses were performed for common cancer sites (stomach, lung, colorectal, and breast).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>MRRs for all-cause mortality were higher in lower nonmanual (MRR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.10–1.18), manual (MRR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.32–1.43), and primary industry workers (MRR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.31) than in upper nonmanual workers (professional and managerial occupations). Similar patterns were observed across common cancer sites and cancer-specific mortality. Adjusting for cancer stage and treatment attenuated these disparities but did not eliminate them, particularly among manual workers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We observed occupational disparities in long-term cancer mortality among working-age populations in Japan, with manual workers experiencing worse survival outcomes. Promoting targeted interventions, healthy lifestyles, and early cancer detection for cancer survivors in the workplace are crucial for mitigating these disparities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.71020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.71020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Limited data exist on occupational disparities in long-term cancer mortality among the working-age population in Japan. We examined occupational disparities in long-term cancer survival, focusing on 10-year survival outcomes among working-age populations.

Methods

This retrospective observational study used data from the Kanagawa Cancer Registry of 41,632 patients with cancer aged 20–65 years who were diagnosed between 1992 and 2015, with a 10-year follow-up. Patients were classified into four occupational classes based on their longest-held occupations (upper nonmanual, lower nonmanual, manual, and primary industry). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and cancer-specific mortality was the secondary outcome. Poisson regression was used to estimate the mortality rate ratios (MRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each occupational class, adjusted for sex, age, and year of diagnosis. Additional analyses were performed for common cancer sites (stomach, lung, colorectal, and breast).

Results

MRRs for all-cause mortality were higher in lower nonmanual (MRR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.10–1.18), manual (MRR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.32–1.43), and primary industry workers (MRR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09–1.31) than in upper nonmanual workers (professional and managerial occupations). Similar patterns were observed across common cancer sites and cancer-specific mortality. Adjusting for cancer stage and treatment attenuated these disparities but did not eliminate them, particularly among manual workers.

Conclusions

We observed occupational disparities in long-term cancer mortality among working-age populations in Japan, with manual workers experiencing worse survival outcomes. Promoting targeted interventions, healthy lifestyles, and early cancer detection for cancer survivors in the workplace are crucial for mitigating these disparities.

Abstract Image

日本工作人口中癌症生存的职业差异:使用神奈川癌症登记处的10年生存分析
背景:关于日本工作年龄人口长期癌症死亡率的职业差异的数据有限。我们研究了长期癌症生存的职业差异,重点关注工作年龄人群的10年生存结果。这项回顾性观察性研究使用了神奈川癌症登记处的41632名年龄在20-65岁之间的癌症患者的数据,这些患者在1992年至2015年期间被诊断出来,随访10年。根据患者从事时间最长的职业(上层非体力劳动、下层非体力劳动、体力劳动和第一产业)将患者分为四类。主要结局是全因死亡率,癌症特异性死亡率是次要结局。泊松回归用于估计每个职业类别的死亡率比(MRRs)和95%置信区间(ci),并根据性别、年龄和诊断年份进行调整。对常见的癌症部位(胃癌、肺癌、结肠直肠癌和乳腺癌)进行了额外的分析。结果低体力劳动者(MRR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.10-1.18)、体力劳动者(MRR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.32-1.43)和第一产业劳动者(MRR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.31)的全因死亡率MRR高于高体力劳动者(专业和管理职业)。在常见的癌症部位和癌症特异性死亡率中也观察到类似的模式。根据癌症分期和治疗方法进行调整,缩小了这些差异,但并没有消除它们,特别是在体力劳动者中。结论:我们观察到日本劳动年龄人群中癌症长期死亡率的职业差异,体力劳动者的生存结果更差。促进有针对性的干预措施、健康的生活方式以及在工作场所对癌症幸存者进行早期癌症检测,对于减轻这些差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信