Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial
András Herczeg, Attila Szijártó, András Fülöp, Krisztina Varga, József Marton, Zoltán Lóderer, Balázs Mohos, Balázs Páncél, Vilmos Szendrényi, György Lázár, László Libor, Zsolt Káposztás, Ervin Máthé, Attila Bursics, Bence Kecskédi, László Sikorszki, László Venczel, Balázs Bánky
{"title":"Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial","authors":"András Herczeg, Attila Szijártó, András Fülöp, Krisztina Varga, József Marton, Zoltán Lóderer, Balázs Mohos, Balázs Páncél, Vilmos Szendrényi, György Lázár, László Libor, Zsolt Káposztás, Ervin Máthé, Attila Bursics, Bence Kecskédi, László Sikorszki, László Venczel, Balázs Bánky","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% <i>p</i> = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% <i>p</i> = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% <i>p</i> = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70718","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% p = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% p = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections.
尽管有现代无菌预防措施,手术部位感染仍然是一个重大问题。虽然负压伤口治疗在治疗慢性伤口方面的益处已经得到了很好的证实,但关于负压在预防手术部位感染方面的潜在作用,仍然缺乏高水平的证据。我们进行了一项多中心、随机、前瞻性的闭合切口真空治疗试验。本研究共纳入90例急诊剖腹手术患者,随机分组,治疗组45例,对照组45例。我们的目的是显示两组手术部位感染率的显著差异。在研究组中,开腹切口采用5天预防性真空治疗单疗程,而对照组采用常规的术后伤口处理,使用无菌纱布敷料。研究组45例患者中有10例发生手术部位感染,对照组45例患者中有20例发生手术部位感染(22.2%对44.4% p = 0.025)。进一步分析,发现ciNPWT组浅表SSI发生率明显降低(40% vs. 20% p = 0.038),而深层SSI发生率差异无统计学意义(4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0)。综上所述,负压创面治疗不仅是一种有效的治疗慢性创面的方法,而且它的预防性使用可以降低手术部位的整体感染率。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687
期刊介绍:
The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories:
- Research papers
- Review articles
- Clinical studies
- Letters
- News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies.
Calendar of events
The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.