Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
András Herczeg, Attila Szijártó, András Fülöp, Krisztina Varga, József Marton, Zoltán Lóderer, Balázs Mohos, Balázs Páncél, Vilmos Szendrényi, György Lázár, László Libor, Zsolt Káposztás, Ervin Máthé, Attila Bursics, Bence Kecskédi, László Sikorszki, László Venczel, Balázs Bánky
{"title":"Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Reduces Superficial Surgical Site Infection Risk of Emergency Surgery Patients: Results of a Multicenter Randomised Prospective Clinical Trial","authors":"András Herczeg,&nbsp;Attila Szijártó,&nbsp;András Fülöp,&nbsp;Krisztina Varga,&nbsp;József Marton,&nbsp;Zoltán Lóderer,&nbsp;Balázs Mohos,&nbsp;Balázs Páncél,&nbsp;Vilmos Szendrényi,&nbsp;György Lázár,&nbsp;László Libor,&nbsp;Zsolt Káposztás,&nbsp;Ervin Máthé,&nbsp;Attila Bursics,&nbsp;Bence Kecskédi,&nbsp;László Sikorszki,&nbsp;László Venczel,&nbsp;Balázs Bánky","doi":"10.1111/iwj.70718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% <i>p</i> = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% <i>p</i> = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% <i>p</i> = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections.</p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.70718","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.70718","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite modern aseptic precautions, surgical site infection remains a significant problem. Although the benefits of negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds are well established, high-level evidence is still lacking on the potential role of negative pressure in the prevention of surgical site infections. We conducted a multicenter, randomised, prospective trial of closed incision vacuum therapy. A total of 90 general surgery patients undergoing emergency laparotomy were enrolled and randomised, 45 cases in the treatment group and 45 cases in the control group. Our aim was to show a significant difference in the rate of surgical site infection between the two groups. In the study group, laparotomy wounds were treated with a single 5-day course of prophylactic vacuum therapy, whereas the control group underwent conventional postoperative wound management with sterile gauze dressings. Ten of the 45 patients in the study group developed a surgical site infection compared to 20 of 45 in the control group (22.2% vs. 44.4% p = 0.025). Upon further analysis, the proportion of superficial SSIs was found to be significantly lower in the ciNPWT group (40% vs. 20% p = 0.038), whereas the difference in deep SSI rates was not statistically significant (4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0). In conclusion, negative pressure wound therapy is not only an effective way to heal chronic wounds, but it's prophylactic use may reduce the overall rate of surgical site infections.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687

预防性负压伤口治疗降低急诊手术患者浅表手术部位感染风险:一项多中心随机前瞻性临床试验的结果
尽管有现代无菌预防措施,手术部位感染仍然是一个重大问题。虽然负压伤口治疗在治疗慢性伤口方面的益处已经得到了很好的证实,但关于负压在预防手术部位感染方面的潜在作用,仍然缺乏高水平的证据。我们进行了一项多中心、随机、前瞻性的闭合切口真空治疗试验。本研究共纳入90例急诊剖腹手术患者,随机分组,治疗组45例,对照组45例。我们的目的是显示两组手术部位感染率的显著差异。在研究组中,开腹切口采用5天预防性真空治疗单疗程,而对照组采用常规的术后伤口处理,使用无菌纱布敷料。研究组45例患者中有10例发生手术部位感染,对照组45例患者中有20例发生手术部位感染(22.2%对44.4% p = 0.025)。进一步分析,发现ciNPWT组浅表SSI发生率明显降低(40% vs. 20% p = 0.038),而深层SSI发生率差异无统计学意义(4.4% vs. 4.4% p = 1.0)。综上所述,负压创面治疗不仅是一种有效的治疗慢性创面的方法,而且它的预防性使用可以降低手术部位的整体感染率。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03716687
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信