Fertility anxiety among Chinese women in the context of fertility policy relaxation: A systematic literature review

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q3 SOCIAL WORK
Yiqing He, Noor Eshah Tom Abdul Wahab, Haslina Muhamad
{"title":"Fertility anxiety among Chinese women in the context of fertility policy relaxation: A systematic literature review","authors":"Yiqing He,&nbsp;Noor Eshah Tom Abdul Wahab,&nbsp;Haslina Muhamad","doi":"10.1111/ijsw.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Against the backdrop of China's comprehensive relaxation of fertility policies, the anxiety experienced by Chinese women during fertility decision-making is widely discussed. To outline the current state of research on Chinese women's fertility anxiety, we systematically reviewed and analyzed 50 relevant studies published between 2015 and 2024, focusing on the conceptualization of fertility anxiety, assessment methods, influencing factors, and theoretical frameworks. The findings indicated that fertility anxiety is a multidimensional psychological state encompassing cognitive anxiety (emerging from rational evaluation of potential consequences of fertility decisions) and emotional anxiety (shaped by sociocultural norms, gender role expectations, and available social support). Recently, research on fertility anxiety has begun to integrate both cognitive and emotional dimensions, which is crucial for designing effective intervention strategies and policy response mechanisms. However, unified and standardized multidimensional measurement tools are still lacking. Studies have often combined quantitative and qualitative methods to indirectly depict the characteristics of fertility anxiety. Regarding influencing factors, research has demonstrated the interconnections between individual attributes, family background, the sociocultural environment, and policy systems, which jointly shape women's fertility anxiety. Various theoretical frameworks have been employed to explain the complex these factors, highlighting the multifaceted and multilayered nature of fertility anxiety. Future research should further advance indigenous theory development and cross-cultural comparison, deepen the tracking of dynamic mechanisms of fertility anxiety, and develop context-sensitive and ecologically valid assessment tools to reveal the interactions among individual, social, and cultural factors, thereby providing a theoretical basis for optimizing policy design and constructing multi-level support systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":47567,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Welfare","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijsw.70028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the backdrop of China's comprehensive relaxation of fertility policies, the anxiety experienced by Chinese women during fertility decision-making is widely discussed. To outline the current state of research on Chinese women's fertility anxiety, we systematically reviewed and analyzed 50 relevant studies published between 2015 and 2024, focusing on the conceptualization of fertility anxiety, assessment methods, influencing factors, and theoretical frameworks. The findings indicated that fertility anxiety is a multidimensional psychological state encompassing cognitive anxiety (emerging from rational evaluation of potential consequences of fertility decisions) and emotional anxiety (shaped by sociocultural norms, gender role expectations, and available social support). Recently, research on fertility anxiety has begun to integrate both cognitive and emotional dimensions, which is crucial for designing effective intervention strategies and policy response mechanisms. However, unified and standardized multidimensional measurement tools are still lacking. Studies have often combined quantitative and qualitative methods to indirectly depict the characteristics of fertility anxiety. Regarding influencing factors, research has demonstrated the interconnections between individual attributes, family background, the sociocultural environment, and policy systems, which jointly shape women's fertility anxiety. Various theoretical frameworks have been employed to explain the complex these factors, highlighting the multifaceted and multilayered nature of fertility anxiety. Future research should further advance indigenous theory development and cross-cultural comparison, deepen the tracking of dynamic mechanisms of fertility anxiety, and develop context-sensitive and ecologically valid assessment tools to reveal the interactions among individual, social, and cultural factors, thereby providing a theoretical basis for optimizing policy design and constructing multi-level support systems.

生育政策放宽背景下中国女性生育焦虑:系统文献综述
在中国全面放宽生育政策的背景下,中国女性在生育决策过程中所经历的焦虑被广泛讨论。为了梳理中国女性生育焦虑的研究现状,我们对2015 - 2024年间发表的50篇相关研究进行了系统梳理和分析,重点从生育焦虑的概念、评估方法、影响因素和理论框架等方面进行了梳理。研究结果表明,生育焦虑是一种多维度的心理状态,包括认知焦虑(来自对生育决策潜在后果的理性评估)和情绪焦虑(受社会文化规范、性别角色期望和现有社会支持的影响)。近年来,对生育焦虑的研究开始从认知和情感两个维度进行整合,这对于设计有效的干预策略和政策反应机制至关重要。但是,目前还缺乏统一的、标准化的多维度量工具。研究往往结合定量和定性的方法来间接描述生育焦虑的特征。在影响因素方面,研究表明个体属性、家庭背景、社会文化环境、政策制度等因素相互关联,共同塑造了女性生育焦虑。各种理论框架被用来解释这些复杂的因素,突出了生育焦虑的多面性和多层次性质。未来的研究应进一步推进本土理论发展和跨文化比较,深化对生育焦虑动态机制的追踪,开发情境敏感、生态有效的评估工具,揭示个体、社会和文化因素之间的相互作用,从而为优化政策设计和构建多层次的支持系统提供理论依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Welfare publishes original articles in English on social welfare and social work. Its interdisciplinary approach and comparative perspective promote examination of the most pressing social welfare issues of the day by researchers from the various branches of the applied social sciences. The journal seeks to disseminate knowledge and to encourage debate about these issues and their regional and global implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信