Amaan Ullah, Nawab Ali Khan, Abukasim Idrisi, Imran Saleem, Mohd Yasir Arafat
{"title":"From Intentions to Actions: How Entrepreneurial Actions and Government Policies Mediate and Moderate This Link","authors":"Amaan Ullah, Nawab Ali Khan, Abukasim Idrisi, Imran Saleem, Mohd Yasir Arafat","doi":"10.1002/pa.70061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Entrepreneurial activity is a key driver of economic growth, contributing to innovation, job creation, and societal advancement. However, the process of transforming entrepreneurial intentions (EIs) into actual actions that lead to job creation is complex and influenced by a range of institutional factors. This study aims to examine the relationship between EIs, job creation expectations, and the role of total early-stage entrepreneurial activities (TEAs) as a mediating factor, while also assessing the moderating effects of government support policies. Using data from the global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) spanning 2001–2023 across 15 selected Asian economies, we identify that entrepreneurial actions partially mediate the link between EI and job creation. Moreover, supportive government policies play a significant moderating role in enhancing this relationship, whereas adverse institutional norms can hinder entrepreneurial progress. The study contributes to the literature by exploring the direct relationship between EIs and job creation, particularly, in the context of Asian economies. Additionally, it offers empirical evidence on the conditional effects of government policies, advancing our understanding of how they jointly influence the intention–action phenomenon. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers aiming to maximize the economic benefits of entrepreneurship through tailored policy reforms.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Entrepreneurial activity is a key driver of economic growth, contributing to innovation, job creation, and societal advancement. However, the process of transforming entrepreneurial intentions (EIs) into actual actions that lead to job creation is complex and influenced by a range of institutional factors. This study aims to examine the relationship between EIs, job creation expectations, and the role of total early-stage entrepreneurial activities (TEAs) as a mediating factor, while also assessing the moderating effects of government support policies. Using data from the global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM) spanning 2001–2023 across 15 selected Asian economies, we identify that entrepreneurial actions partially mediate the link between EI and job creation. Moreover, supportive government policies play a significant moderating role in enhancing this relationship, whereas adverse institutional norms can hinder entrepreneurial progress. The study contributes to the literature by exploring the direct relationship between EIs and job creation, particularly, in the context of Asian economies. Additionally, it offers empirical evidence on the conditional effects of government policies, advancing our understanding of how they jointly influence the intention–action phenomenon. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers aiming to maximize the economic benefits of entrepreneurship through tailored policy reforms.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.