From Theory to Practice: A Literature Review of Theoretical Frameworks in Public Sector Sustainability Reporting

IF 1.8 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Natalia Arias, Miguel Marco-Fondevila, Ana Yetano
{"title":"From Theory to Practice: A Literature Review of Theoretical Frameworks in Public Sector Sustainability Reporting","authors":"Natalia Arias,&nbsp;Miguel Marco-Fondevila,&nbsp;Ana Yetano","doi":"10.1002/pa.70063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article reviews the evolution of corporate sustainability reporting (CSR) in the public sector, focusing on theoretical frameworks and their application in enhancing transparency and accountability. A systematic literature review of 126 journal articles was conducted to explore the theoretical underpinnings of CSR in the public sector, emphasizing economic, system-oriented, and multi-theoretical frameworks. The study identifies a shift from single-theory approaches to multi-theoretical models, reflecting the complexity of public sector sustainability reporting. Key trends include increased stakeholder engagement and the influence of international sustainability standards. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of CSR in the public sector, highlighting the theoretical evolution and suggesting future research directions to improve implementation and impact. The study is limited to published articles and may not capture all emerging practices. Further research could explore sector-specific reporting guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":47153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Affairs","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/pa.70063","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pa.70063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reviews the evolution of corporate sustainability reporting (CSR) in the public sector, focusing on theoretical frameworks and their application in enhancing transparency and accountability. A systematic literature review of 126 journal articles was conducted to explore the theoretical underpinnings of CSR in the public sector, emphasizing economic, system-oriented, and multi-theoretical frameworks. The study identifies a shift from single-theory approaches to multi-theoretical models, reflecting the complexity of public sector sustainability reporting. Key trends include increased stakeholder engagement and the influence of international sustainability standards. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of CSR in the public sector, highlighting the theoretical evolution and suggesting future research directions to improve implementation and impact. The study is limited to published articles and may not capture all emerging practices. Further research could explore sector-specific reporting guidelines.

Abstract Image

从理论到实践:公共部门可持续发展报告理论框架的文献综述
本文回顾了企业可持续发展报告(CSR)在公共部门的演变,重点关注理论框架及其在提高透明度和问责制方面的应用。本文对126篇期刊文章进行了系统的文献综述,以探讨公共部门企业社会责任的理论基础,强调经济、系统导向和多理论框架。该研究确定了从单一理论方法到多理论模型的转变,反映了公共部门可持续发展报告的复杂性。主要趋势包括利益攸关方参与的增加和国际可持续性标准的影响。本文对公共部门的企业社会责任进行了全面的分析,强调了理论的演变,并提出了未来的研究方向,以改善实施和影响。该研究仅限于已发表的文章,可能无法涵盖所有新兴的实践。进一步的研究可以探讨针对特定部门的报告准则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Affairs
Journal of Public Affairs PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Affairs provides an international forum for refereed papers, case studies and reviews on the latest developments, practice and thinking in government relations, public affairs, and political marketing. The Journal is guided by the twin objectives of publishing submissions of the utmost relevance to the day-to-day practice of communication specialists, and promoting the highest standards of intellectual rigour.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信