Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium–Ion Battery Pack

IF 4.8 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Antonella Accardo;Gaia Gentilucci;Luca Pontone;Ezio Spessa
{"title":"Investigating Life Cycle Cost, Environmental and Social Impacts of a Lithium–Ion Battery Pack","authors":"Antonella Accardo;Gaia Gentilucci;Luca Pontone;Ezio Spessa","doi":"10.1109/OJVT.2025.3579221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluates the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the life cycle of a battery pack for automotive applications. The analysis employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for environmental assessment, Life Cycle Costing (LCC) for economic assessment, and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) for social impact analysis. Key locations of non-European raw material extraction and refining are considered for the supply chain. Instead, European countries are considered the final destination for battery pack manufacturing and assembly, use, and End-of-Life (EoL). For the use and EoL phases, three scenarios are analyzed. The LCA results indicate that greenhouse gas emissions vary from 77.2 kg CO<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> -eq/kWh to 80.7 kg CO<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>-eq/kWh across the evaluated scenarios. Similarly, the economic assessment estimates LCCs between 77.7 EUR/kWh and 79.4 EUR/kWh, depending on the scenario. The S-LCA results highlight significant risks related to fair pay across numerous countries during the raw material extraction phase, particularly for cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo), manganese (South Africa), nickel (Australia), lithium (Australia), and graphite (China). In addition, the score for health and safety concerns presents high risks associated with cobalt, manganese, and nickel mining. In contrast, no significant critical social impacts are found for the use and EoL phases.","PeriodicalId":34270,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1698-1709"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11031181","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11031181/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the environmental, economic, and social impacts of the life cycle of a battery pack for automotive applications. The analysis employs Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for environmental assessment, Life Cycle Costing (LCC) for economic assessment, and Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA) for social impact analysis. Key locations of non-European raw material extraction and refining are considered for the supply chain. Instead, European countries are considered the final destination for battery pack manufacturing and assembly, use, and End-of-Life (EoL). For the use and EoL phases, three scenarios are analyzed. The LCA results indicate that greenhouse gas emissions vary from 77.2 kg CO$_{2}$ -eq/kWh to 80.7 kg CO$_{2}$-eq/kWh across the evaluated scenarios. Similarly, the economic assessment estimates LCCs between 77.7 EUR/kWh and 79.4 EUR/kWh, depending on the scenario. The S-LCA results highlight significant risks related to fair pay across numerous countries during the raw material extraction phase, particularly for cobalt (Democratic Republic of the Congo), manganese (South Africa), nickel (Australia), lithium (Australia), and graphite (China). In addition, the score for health and safety concerns presents high risks associated with cobalt, manganese, and nickel mining. In contrast, no significant critical social impacts are found for the use and EoL phases.
研究锂离子电池组的生命周期成本、环境和社会影响
本研究评估了汽车用电池组生命周期对环境、经济和社会的影响。环境评价采用生命周期评价法(LCA),经济评价采用生命周期成本法(LCC),社会影响分析采用社会生命周期评价法(S-LCA)。在供应链中考虑了非欧洲原材料提取和精炼的关键地点。相反,欧洲国家被认为是电池组制造、组装、使用和报废(EoL)的最终目的地。对于使用和EoL阶段,分析了三种场景。LCA结果表明,在评估情景中,温室气体排放量从77.2 kg CO$ $ bbb $ $-eq/kWh到80.7 kg CO$ $ bbb $-eq/kWh不等。同样,经济评估估计lcc在77.7欧元/千瓦时和79.4欧元/千瓦时之间,具体取决于场景。S-LCA结果强调了许多国家在原材料开采阶段与公平薪酬相关的重大风险,特别是钴(刚果民主共和国)、锰(南非)、镍(澳大利亚)、锂(澳大利亚)和石墨(中国)。此外,健康和安全问题得分表明,钴、锰和镍的开采存在高风险。相比之下,在使用和EoL阶段没有发现显著的关键社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信