{"title":"Should I stay or should I go? Children’s motivation in response to feedback and its association with math anxiety and math self-concept","authors":"Megan Merrick, Emily R. Fyfe","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Receiving corrective feedback can influence motivation in different ways – either inspiring learners to continue or leading learners to avoid the task. In the current study, we examined elementary school children’s in-the-moment behavioral motivation in response to feedback, and how it related to their anxiety and self-concept in mathematics. Children (<em>N</em> = 150; <em>M</em> age = 7.35; 44 % female; 65 % White) in the United States solved a series of mathematical equivalence problems in the context of a computer game (e.g., 3 + 4 = 5 +?). They received trial-by-trial feedback that included both knowledge of results (KR) and knowledge of the correct response (KCR), and they had the option to stop the game or keep playing after each level. Children were generally motivated and chose to complete many items. However, children who received a lot of negative feedback stopped the game earlier relative to others, and this was especially true when they also had high math anxiety or high math self-concept. In contrast to our predictions, higher math self-concept was not strongly associated with higher motivation to keep playing. These results have implications for theories on feedback and for designing problem-solving contexts that can support children’s motivation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 102393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X2500058X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Receiving corrective feedback can influence motivation in different ways – either inspiring learners to continue or leading learners to avoid the task. In the current study, we examined elementary school children’s in-the-moment behavioral motivation in response to feedback, and how it related to their anxiety and self-concept in mathematics. Children (N = 150; M age = 7.35; 44 % female; 65 % White) in the United States solved a series of mathematical equivalence problems in the context of a computer game (e.g., 3 + 4 = 5 +?). They received trial-by-trial feedback that included both knowledge of results (KR) and knowledge of the correct response (KCR), and they had the option to stop the game or keep playing after each level. Children were generally motivated and chose to complete many items. However, children who received a lot of negative feedback stopped the game earlier relative to others, and this was especially true when they also had high math anxiety or high math self-concept. In contrast to our predictions, higher math self-concept was not strongly associated with higher motivation to keep playing. These results have implications for theories on feedback and for designing problem-solving contexts that can support children’s motivation.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.