Urbanisation, democracy, and political regime transformations

IF 4.9 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Nick Dorward , Sean Fox , Kristian Hoelscher
{"title":"Urbanisation, democracy, and political regime transformations","authors":"Nick Dorward ,&nbsp;Sean Fox ,&nbsp;Kristian Hoelscher","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2025.103382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities, and the process of urbanisation more broadly, have long been associated with political change – and democratisation in particular. However, there is little cross-country empirical research on the relationship between urbanisation and political change, and a tendency to conflate urbanisation with industrialisation and economic development. This gap is significant for two reasons. First, many of the hypothesised mechanisms linking urbanisation to political change are associated with socioeconomic changes driven by industrialisation and economic development. Second, many low- and middle-income countries have undergone rapid “urbanisation without industrialisation”. What then are the political consequences of urbanisation without industrialisation?</div><div>To answer this, we draw a key conceptual distinction between <em>urbanisation</em> – the increase in the relative share of a country's population living in urban areas – and <em>urban population scale</em> – the absolute size of urban populations. While much of the literature focuses upon the political implications of urbanisation, we argue that the sheer scale of urban populations may be more consequential for political change. Specifically, we suggest that although the hypothesised associations between urban living and democratic preferences among citizens are weak, urban living facilitates political engagement, and hence large urban populations may stimulate political change.</div><div>We test this hypothesis with cross-national regressions analysing the determinants of levels of democracy and episodes of political regime transformation since 1960 in 161 countries. We find no association between levels of urbanisation or urban population size and levels of democracy. By contrast, we find a positive and significant association between urban population size and political regime transformations, with a bias towards democratic change. Our study offers important insights into the relationship between urbanisation and political change and the political implications of rapid urbanisation without industrialisation unfolding in many parts of the world today.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 103382"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629825001143","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities, and the process of urbanisation more broadly, have long been associated with political change – and democratisation in particular. However, there is little cross-country empirical research on the relationship between urbanisation and political change, and a tendency to conflate urbanisation with industrialisation and economic development. This gap is significant for two reasons. First, many of the hypothesised mechanisms linking urbanisation to political change are associated with socioeconomic changes driven by industrialisation and economic development. Second, many low- and middle-income countries have undergone rapid “urbanisation without industrialisation”. What then are the political consequences of urbanisation without industrialisation?
To answer this, we draw a key conceptual distinction between urbanisation – the increase in the relative share of a country's population living in urban areas – and urban population scale – the absolute size of urban populations. While much of the literature focuses upon the political implications of urbanisation, we argue that the sheer scale of urban populations may be more consequential for political change. Specifically, we suggest that although the hypothesised associations between urban living and democratic preferences among citizens are weak, urban living facilitates political engagement, and hence large urban populations may stimulate political change.
We test this hypothesis with cross-national regressions analysing the determinants of levels of democracy and episodes of political regime transformation since 1960 in 161 countries. We find no association between levels of urbanisation or urban population size and levels of democracy. By contrast, we find a positive and significant association between urban population size and political regime transformations, with a bias towards democratic change. Our study offers important insights into the relationship between urbanisation and political change and the political implications of rapid urbanisation without industrialisation unfolding in many parts of the world today.
城市化、民主和政治体制转型
长期以来,城市,以及更广泛意义上的城市化进程,一直与政治变革——尤其是民主化——联系在一起。然而,关于城市化与政治变革之间关系的跨国实证研究很少,并且倾向于将城市化与工业化和经济发展混为一谈。这一差距之所以显著,有两个原因。首先,将城市化与政治变革联系起来的许多假设机制都与工业化和经济发展推动的社会经济变化有关。第二,许多中低收入国家经历了快速的“未工业化的城市化”。那么,没有工业化的城市化会带来怎样的政治后果呢?为了回答这个问题,我们在城市化(一个国家生活在城市地区的人口相对份额的增加)和城市人口规模(城市人口的绝对规模)之间划出了一个关键的概念区别。虽然大部分文献关注的是城市化的政治影响,但我们认为,城市人口的绝对规模可能对政治变革产生更大的影响。具体来说,我们认为,尽管城市生活与公民的民主偏好之间的假设关联很弱,但城市生活促进了政治参与,因此大量城市人口可能会刺激政治变革。我们用跨国回归分析了自1960年以来161个国家民主水平的决定因素和政治体制转型的事件来检验这一假设。我们发现城市化水平或城市人口规模与民主水平之间没有关联。相比之下,我们发现城市人口规模与政治体制转型之间存在显著的正相关关系,并倾向于民主变革。我们的研究为城市化与政治变革之间的关系以及当今世界许多地区在没有工业化的情况下快速城市化的政治影响提供了重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信