Don't judge a food by its package: Greenwashing alters health perceptions

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Halle McLean , Andrew Ward
{"title":"Don't judge a food by its package: Greenwashing alters health perceptions","authors":"Halle McLean ,&nbsp;Andrew Ward","doi":"10.1016/j.eatbeh.2025.102009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Past research has shown that “greenwashed” package designs promote the belief that a product is environmentally friendly. The present investigation tested whether greenwashing influences the perceived health benefits of food items. In Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 84), participants generally perceived greenwashed foods to be healthier than did participants evaluating comparable foods in conventional packages. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 76) additionally compared the impact of a label indicating “organic.” Results showed that for food items generally perceived as healthier, both greenwashed and organic products were rated as significantly healthier than conventionally labeled food products; for foods perceived as less healthy, only the greenwashed items were considered to be healthier, whereas for items generally considered to be unhealthy, package labeling did not exert a significant effect on health perceptions. Implications for the impact of food labeling on perceptions of environmental sustainability and health are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11476,"journal":{"name":"Eating behaviors","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 102009"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471015325000741","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past research has shown that “greenwashed” package designs promote the belief that a product is environmentally friendly. The present investigation tested whether greenwashing influences the perceived health benefits of food items. In Study 1 (N = 84), participants generally perceived greenwashed foods to be healthier than did participants evaluating comparable foods in conventional packages. Study 2 (N = 76) additionally compared the impact of a label indicating “organic.” Results showed that for food items generally perceived as healthier, both greenwashed and organic products were rated as significantly healthier than conventionally labeled food products; for foods perceived as less healthy, only the greenwashed items were considered to be healthier, whereas for items generally considered to be unhealthy, package labeling did not exert a significant effect on health perceptions. Implications for the impact of food labeling on perceptions of environmental sustainability and health are discussed.
不要以貌取人:洗绿会改变人们对健康的看法
过去的研究表明,“绿色洗涤”的包装设计促进了产品对环境友好的信念。目前的调查测试了“漂绿”是否会影响人们对食品健康益处的认知。在研究1 (N = 84)中,参与者普遍认为绿色食品比评估传统包装的同类食品更健康。研究2 (N = 76)还比较了“有机”标签的影响。结果表明,对于通常被认为更健康的食品,绿色洗涤和有机产品都被认为比传统标签的食品更健康;对于被认为不太健康的食品,只有绿色食品被认为更健康,而对于通常被认为不健康的食品,包装标签对健康观念没有显著影响。影响食品标签对环境可持续性和健康的看法进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Eating behaviors
Eating behaviors Multiple-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.60%
发文量
65
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Eating Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing human research on the etiology, prevention, and treatment of obesity, binge eating, and eating disorders in adults and children. Studies related to the promotion of healthy eating patterns to treat or prevent medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cancer) are also acceptable. Two types of manuscripts are encouraged: (1) Descriptive studies establishing functional relationships between eating behaviors and social, cognitive, environmental, attitudinal, emotional or biochemical factors; (2) Clinical outcome research evaluating the efficacy of prevention or treatment protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信