{"title":"Exploring substantive SEA effectiveness: A critical review of plan environmental impact assessment (PEIA) in Chinese urban planning","authors":"Haojia Wang , Thomas B Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plan Environmental Impact Assessment (PEIA), introduced in China in 2003 as the main form of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), has now been practiced for over two decades. However, systematic empirical research evaluating substantive effectiveness and its underlying drivers has remained scarce. This gap is problematic, as China is currently undertaking a major reform to unify land use, urban, and ecological plans under a national territorial planning framework. In this paper, the authors evaluate the substantive effectiveness of PEIA in urban planning through nine cases across five cities: Shenzhen, Nanjing, Fuzhou, Kunming, and Lanzhou. A comprehensive approach, including stakeholder interviews, site inspections, and document analyses was employed. Results indicate that, regarding direct impacts, although there are exemplary cases such as the urban master plans of Shenzhen and Nanjing where SEAs positively influenced decisions and planning, many cases fail to significantly affect strategic planning decisions. However, indirect impacts such as enhanced decision-makers environmental awareness and improved organizational cooperation and communication have been observed consistently, though their broader influence on institutional norms and stakeholder collaboration remains limited. Identified barriers, such as late-stage integration, weak stakeholder participation, institutional constraints, and poor interdepartmental coordination, limit PEIA's direct and indirect roles in shaping strategic planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 108067"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525002641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Plan Environmental Impact Assessment (PEIA), introduced in China in 2003 as the main form of Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA), has now been practiced for over two decades. However, systematic empirical research evaluating substantive effectiveness and its underlying drivers has remained scarce. This gap is problematic, as China is currently undertaking a major reform to unify land use, urban, and ecological plans under a national territorial planning framework. In this paper, the authors evaluate the substantive effectiveness of PEIA in urban planning through nine cases across five cities: Shenzhen, Nanjing, Fuzhou, Kunming, and Lanzhou. A comprehensive approach, including stakeholder interviews, site inspections, and document analyses was employed. Results indicate that, regarding direct impacts, although there are exemplary cases such as the urban master plans of Shenzhen and Nanjing where SEAs positively influenced decisions and planning, many cases fail to significantly affect strategic planning decisions. However, indirect impacts such as enhanced decision-makers environmental awareness and improved organizational cooperation and communication have been observed consistently, though their broader influence on institutional norms and stakeholder collaboration remains limited. Identified barriers, such as late-stage integration, weak stakeholder participation, institutional constraints, and poor interdepartmental coordination, limit PEIA's direct and indirect roles in shaping strategic planning.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.