{"title":"Making fossil fuel futures: The discursive formation of Canada's net-zero imaginary","authors":"Emiliano Castillo Jara","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Canada, one of the world's largest oil producers, plans to achieve net-zero emissions in the oil sector by 2050 by relying on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS). The Government of Canada and the fossil fuel industry frame net-zero as a solution to address climate change, advance the energy transition, and achieve reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. Yet, this framing is contested by Indigenous and environmental groups that draw attention to the risks, impacts, and inequalities of net-zero. Although research has examined Canada's contradictory climate policy, little attention has been paid to the production and contestation of the net-zero future vision. Connecting research on socio-technical imaginaries and the geographical political economy of energy transitions, this paper explores the discursive configuration of the net-zero imaginary and its spatial dimensions in a settler-colonial context characterized by intensive fossil fuel extraction. Based on Hajer's argumentative discourse approach, this work elucidates the role of key storylines in shaping the net-zero imaginary:. A critical analysis of these storylines reveals the contradictions and limitations of net-zero. In particular, it shows that net-zero 1) reinforces fossil fuel expansion by relying on unproven CCUS and voluntary net-zero targets, and 2) consolidates colonial land claims by portraying Indigenous peoples' lands as being available for net-zero projects. These findings extend discussions about the making of net-zero futures, highlighting the need to place justice issues at the heart of the energy transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104182"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625002634","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Canada, one of the world's largest oil producers, plans to achieve net-zero emissions in the oil sector by 2050 by relying on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS). The Government of Canada and the fossil fuel industry frame net-zero as a solution to address climate change, advance the energy transition, and achieve reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. Yet, this framing is contested by Indigenous and environmental groups that draw attention to the risks, impacts, and inequalities of net-zero. Although research has examined Canada's contradictory climate policy, little attention has been paid to the production and contestation of the net-zero future vision. Connecting research on socio-technical imaginaries and the geographical political economy of energy transitions, this paper explores the discursive configuration of the net-zero imaginary and its spatial dimensions in a settler-colonial context characterized by intensive fossil fuel extraction. Based on Hajer's argumentative discourse approach, this work elucidates the role of key storylines in shaping the net-zero imaginary:. A critical analysis of these storylines reveals the contradictions and limitations of net-zero. In particular, it shows that net-zero 1) reinforces fossil fuel expansion by relying on unproven CCUS and voluntary net-zero targets, and 2) consolidates colonial land claims by portraying Indigenous peoples' lands as being available for net-zero projects. These findings extend discussions about the making of net-zero futures, highlighting the need to place justice issues at the heart of the energy transition.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.