Revealed preference axioms for endogenous consideration set formation

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Edward Honda , Lintao Ye
{"title":"Revealed preference axioms for endogenous consideration set formation","authors":"Edward Honda ,&nbsp;Lintao Ye","doi":"10.1016/j.jmateco.2025.103152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We consider a setting in which the consideration sets being formed by a decision maker are observable. We analyze the necessary and sufficient conditions under which the observed sets are consistent with endogenous consideration set formation. In particular, we rationalize the consideration sets as being optimally formed by a decision maker who faces costly attention and is forced to choose a subset of alternatives to pay attention to. We show that axioms similar to those from revealed preference theory allow us to do this. The most general model is characterized by a condition resembling the Strong Axiom applied on a domain of sets rather than individual alternatives. Since the idea of observable consideration sets seems realistic in a random choice framework in which we can interpret zero probability of being chosen as the alternative being omitted from the consideration set, we apply our result to this setting using the Logit model. This results in a representation theorem for a generalized version of the Logit model.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50145,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304406825000692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider a setting in which the consideration sets being formed by a decision maker are observable. We analyze the necessary and sufficient conditions under which the observed sets are consistent with endogenous consideration set formation. In particular, we rationalize the consideration sets as being optimally formed by a decision maker who faces costly attention and is forced to choose a subset of alternatives to pay attention to. We show that axioms similar to those from revealed preference theory allow us to do this. The most general model is characterized by a condition resembling the Strong Axiom applied on a domain of sets rather than individual alternatives. Since the idea of observable consideration sets seems realistic in a random choice framework in which we can interpret zero probability of being chosen as the alternative being omitted from the consideration set, we apply our result to this setting using the Logit model. This results in a representation theorem for a generalized version of the Logit model.
揭示了内生考虑集形成的偏好公理
我们考虑一个由决策者形成的考虑集是可观察到的设置。我们分析了观测集与内生考虑集形成一致的充分必要条件。特别是,我们将考虑集合理化为决策者在面对昂贵的关注时形成的最优选择,并被迫选择一个子集来关注备选方案。我们证明了类似于揭示偏好理论的公理允许我们这样做。最一般的模型的特点是一个条件类似于强公理应用于集合的领域,而不是单独的选择。由于可观察考虑集的想法在随机选择框架中似乎是现实的,在随机选择框架中,我们可以将被选择的零概率解释为从考虑集中忽略的备选项,因此我们使用Logit模型将我们的结果应用于该设置。这就得到了Logit模型广义版本的表示定理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mathematical Economics
Journal of Mathematical Economics 管理科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary objective of the Journal is to provide a forum for work in economic theory which expresses economic ideas using formal mathematical reasoning. For work to add to this primary objective, it is not sufficient that the mathematical reasoning be new and correct. The work must have real economic content. The economic ideas must be interesting and important. These ideas may pertain to any field of economics or any school of economic thought.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信