Expectations, conditioning, and the placebo effect do not differ between fibromyalgia patients and healthy controls but might be differently associated

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Galia Emergui , Mariana Agostinho , Rita Canaipa , Roi Treister
{"title":"Expectations, conditioning, and the placebo effect do not differ between fibromyalgia patients and healthy controls but might be differently associated","authors":"Galia Emergui ,&nbsp;Mariana Agostinho ,&nbsp;Rita Canaipa ,&nbsp;Roi Treister","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals with chronic pain such as fibromyalgia (FM) are often experiencing disappointing outcomes from clinical therapies, which theoretically should condition them to experience low placebo analgesia. However, no consistent differences in the placebo effect were found between healthy controls (HC) and chronic pain patients. This study examined the expectations, conditioning, and placebo effect in HC and FM, and the relationships between these factors in both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Female HC and FM patients were recruited, provided demographic and clinical information and underwent the experimental placebo paradigm. This paradigm has the advantage of measuring expectations (baseline, reinforced, and after placebo), conditioning, and placebo effect. Mixed factorial ANCOVAs, correlational analysis, stepwise and moderation regression analysis were employed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-seven HC and 32 FM patients participated. Three Mixed factorial ANCOVAs showed no main effects of group or interactions for expectations (<em>p</em> = .692), conditioning (<em>p</em> = .357), or placebo effect (<em>p</em> = .819). Reinforced expectations predicted the conditioning strength (<em>r</em> = .48, <em>p</em> = .008) and placebo effect (<em>r</em> = .44, <em>p</em> = .014) in HC but not in FM participants. In FM, duration of pain predicted the reinforced expectations (<em>r</em> = −.38, <em>p</em> = .035) and moderated the prediction of the placebo effect by the conditioning strength (b = .04, <em>p</em> = .011).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While the classical placebo theorem is supported in healthy controls, with conditioning influencing expectations, which in turn predict the placebo effect, these associations are not observed in fibromyalgia, where prior clinical experience plays a more significant role. These findings underscore the impact of previous negative clinical experiences on the placebo effect and, possibly, on responses to effective treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 112207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925001710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Individuals with chronic pain such as fibromyalgia (FM) are often experiencing disappointing outcomes from clinical therapies, which theoretically should condition them to experience low placebo analgesia. However, no consistent differences in the placebo effect were found between healthy controls (HC) and chronic pain patients. This study examined the expectations, conditioning, and placebo effect in HC and FM, and the relationships between these factors in both groups.

Methods

Female HC and FM patients were recruited, provided demographic and clinical information and underwent the experimental placebo paradigm. This paradigm has the advantage of measuring expectations (baseline, reinforced, and after placebo), conditioning, and placebo effect. Mixed factorial ANCOVAs, correlational analysis, stepwise and moderation regression analysis were employed.

Results

Thirty-seven HC and 32 FM patients participated. Three Mixed factorial ANCOVAs showed no main effects of group or interactions for expectations (p = .692), conditioning (p = .357), or placebo effect (p = .819). Reinforced expectations predicted the conditioning strength (r = .48, p = .008) and placebo effect (r = .44, p = .014) in HC but not in FM participants. In FM, duration of pain predicted the reinforced expectations (r = −.38, p = .035) and moderated the prediction of the placebo effect by the conditioning strength (b = .04, p = .011).

Conclusion

While the classical placebo theorem is supported in healthy controls, with conditioning influencing expectations, which in turn predict the placebo effect, these associations are not observed in fibromyalgia, where prior clinical experience plays a more significant role. These findings underscore the impact of previous negative clinical experiences on the placebo effect and, possibly, on responses to effective treatments.
预期、条件作用和安慰剂效应在纤维肌痛患者和健康对照组之间没有差异,但可能存在不同的相关性
慢性疼痛患者如纤维肌痛(FM)的临床治疗结果往往令人失望,理论上应该使他们适应低剂量安慰剂镇痛。然而,在健康对照(HC)和慢性疼痛患者之间没有发现安慰剂效应的一致性差异。本研究考察了HC和FM的预期、条件作用和安慰剂效应,以及两组中这些因素之间的关系。方法招募女性HC和FM患者,提供人口学和临床信息,并进行安慰剂实验。这种模式在测量期望(基线、强化和安慰剂之后)、条件反射和安慰剂效应方面具有优势。采用混合因子ANCOVAs、相关分析、逐步回归和适度回归分析。结果HC患者37例,FM患者32例。三个混合因子ANCOVAs显示,在预期(p = .692)、条件作用(p = .357)或安慰剂效应(p = .819)方面,组或相互作用没有主要影响。强化期望预测HC参与者的条件反射强度(r = 0.48, p = 0.008)和安慰剂效应(r = 0.44, p = 0.014),而FM参与者没有。在FM中,疼痛持续时间预测强化期望(r =−)。38, p = 0.035),并通过调节强度调节安慰剂效应的预测(b = 0.04, p = 0.011)。结论经典安慰剂定理在健康对照中得到支持,条件作用影响预期,预期反过来预测安慰剂效应,但在纤维肌痛中没有观察到这些关联,先前的临床经验起着更重要的作用。这些发现强调了先前的负面临床经历对安慰剂效应的影响,并可能对有效治疗的反应产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信