Development and acceptability testing of a tracheostomy decision support video for parents

Stephanie K. Kukora , Kerry Ryan , Haoyang Yan , Rachel Clarke , Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren , Kenneth Pituch
{"title":"Development and acceptability testing of a tracheostomy decision support video for parents","authors":"Stephanie K. Kukora ,&nbsp;Kerry Ryan ,&nbsp;Haoyang Yan ,&nbsp;Rachel Clarke ,&nbsp;Cynthia Arslanian-Engoren ,&nbsp;Kenneth Pituch","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop a clinical, bedside intervention with peer parent narratives to help parents understand the shared decision-making (SDM) process, their role in the decision, and other parents' considerations in this context.</div></div><div><h3>Patient involvement</h3><div>To ensure that the intervention reflected parents' needs, we identified eight parents who had faced a tracheostomy decision for their child and were willing to talk about their experiences on a video recording. Half of the parents had chosen tracheostomy; some children of parents making either choice had died. We included parents of diverse racial backgrounds whose children had different diagnoses. Parent interviews, along with an explanation of SDM for parents, were edited into a 17-min video guided by iterative feedback from parents and clinicians. Additional parents of children with tracheostomies then viewed the video and shared perceptions about acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>After an iterative process of developing the video in partnership with parents, we piloted the video with 18 parents in 16 online interviews (two were couples) who were not part of video development but had faced a tracheostomy decision for their child within the last three years. Participants were asked about their experiences, viewed the video, and provided verbal feedback and reflection on the acceptability of the video and its anticipated clinical use. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed, focusing on feedback.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Parents who viewed the video provided generally favorable feedback, describing the video as “helpful,” and appreciating the diversity of the cases represented and the perspectives offered. They felt that it could empower parents to ask questions and voice their opinions to the medical team. Parents noted feeling a connection to the emotions expressed by the parents in the video and felt it would help parents facing these decisions to feel less alone.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion/practical value</h3><div>Video education focusing on parents' perspectives may help support the SDM process for pediatric tracheostomy and complement other strategies to support parent engagement. Similar approaches may be valuable in explaining SDM to patients or families facing other serious decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277262822500041X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To develop a clinical, bedside intervention with peer parent narratives to help parents understand the shared decision-making (SDM) process, their role in the decision, and other parents' considerations in this context.

Patient involvement

To ensure that the intervention reflected parents' needs, we identified eight parents who had faced a tracheostomy decision for their child and were willing to talk about their experiences on a video recording. Half of the parents had chosen tracheostomy; some children of parents making either choice had died. We included parents of diverse racial backgrounds whose children had different diagnoses. Parent interviews, along with an explanation of SDM for parents, were edited into a 17-min video guided by iterative feedback from parents and clinicians. Additional parents of children with tracheostomies then viewed the video and shared perceptions about acceptability.

Methods

After an iterative process of developing the video in partnership with parents, we piloted the video with 18 parents in 16 online interviews (two were couples) who were not part of video development but had faced a tracheostomy decision for their child within the last three years. Participants were asked about their experiences, viewed the video, and provided verbal feedback and reflection on the acceptability of the video and its anticipated clinical use. Interviews were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed, focusing on feedback.

Results

Parents who viewed the video provided generally favorable feedback, describing the video as “helpful,” and appreciating the diversity of the cases represented and the perspectives offered. They felt that it could empower parents to ask questions and voice their opinions to the medical team. Parents noted feeling a connection to the emotions expressed by the parents in the video and felt it would help parents facing these decisions to feel less alone.

Discussion/practical value

Video education focusing on parents' perspectives may help support the SDM process for pediatric tracheostomy and complement other strategies to support parent engagement. Similar approaches may be valuable in explaining SDM to patients or families facing other serious decisions.
父母气管切开术决策支持视频的开发和可接受性测试
目的通过同伴父母的叙述,开发一种临床、床边干预方法,帮助父母了解共同决策(SDM)过程、他们在决策中的作用以及在此背景下其他父母的考虑。患者参与:为了确保干预反映了家长的需求,我们找到了8位父母,他们都曾为孩子做过气管切开术的决定,并愿意在视频中谈论他们的经历。半数家长选择气管切开术;有些父母在两者中任选其一的孩子已经死亡。我们包括了不同种族背景的父母,他们的孩子有不同的诊断。在家长和临床医生反复反馈的指导下,家长访谈以及对家长SDM的解释被编辑成一个17分钟的视频。随后,接受气管切开术的孩子的其他家长观看了视频,并分享了对可接受性的看法。方法:在与父母合作开发视频的反复过程之后,我们在16次在线访谈中对18位父母(其中两对是夫妇)进行了视频试点,这些父母不参与视频开发,但在过去三年内为他们的孩子面临气管切开术的决定。参与者被问及他们的经历,观看视频,并就视频的可接受性及其预期的临床应用提供口头反馈和反思。采访记录和定性分析,重点是反馈。结果看了视频的家长给出了普遍好评的反馈,称视频“有帮助”,并对所代表的案例的多样性和提供的观点表示赞赏。他们认为这可以让父母向医疗团队提出问题并发表意见。家长们注意到,他们与视频中父母们表达的情绪有一种联系,并认为这会帮助父母们在面对这些决定时感到不那么孤独。讨论/实用价值侧重于家长观点的视频教育可能有助于支持儿童气管切开术的SDM过程,并补充其他支持家长参与的策略。在向面临其他重大决定的患者或家庭解释SDM时,类似的方法可能很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信