Cancelled elective operations and 28-day breaches in the NHS in England: an interrupted time series analysis of the 2002 penalty policy, 2008 recession, and COVID-19 pandemic (1994–2023)
Laura Quinn , Paul Bird , Timothy P. Hofer , Richard Lilford
{"title":"Cancelled elective operations and 28-day breaches in the NHS in England: an interrupted time series analysis of the 2002 penalty policy, 2008 recession, and COVID-19 pandemic (1994–2023)","authors":"Laura Quinn , Paul Bird , Timothy P. Hofer , Richard Lilford","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>In 2002, the English National Health Service (NHS) introduced financial penalties for hospitals failing to provide elective operations within 28 days of last-minute cancellations. This study investigates the impact of this policy, the 2008 global recession, and the COVID-19 pandemic on cancelled operations and breaches of the 28-day standard.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective observational study using publicly available NHS England data from 1994 to 2023. Interrupted time series analysis assessed changes in cancelled operations and breaches of the 28-day standard across three key periods: pre- and post-2002 policy implementation, post-2008 recession, and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Subgroup analysis by hospital trust A&E department presence on breaches of the 28-day standard was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Elective admissions nearly doubled over 30 years, rising from just over 1 million per quarter in 1994 (1,054,818) to almost 2 million in 2023 (1,975,508), an 87% increase. Cancellation rates increased leading up to the 2002 policy change but fell rapidly below 1% afterwards and remained stable. The 2008 recession and COVID-19 pandemic did not impact cancellation rates, but did increase breaches of the 28-day standard. Breaches rose before the 2002 policy, dropped rapidly afterwards (−9.6%, 95% CI: −11.2, −9.0), but increased after the recession and notably post-pandemic (13.0%, 95% CI: 4.9%, 21.0%), remaining high and negating earlier gains. Hospitals with A&E departments experienced higher post-pandemic increases in breach rates (12.7%, 95% CI: 10.8, 14.7) compared to those without (0.3%, 95% CI: −3.7, 4.4).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>The 2002 policy effectively reduced breaches of the 28-day standard for many years but could not be maintained after the COVID-19 pandemic, when breach rates reached high levels, especially hospitals with A&E departments that could not protect elective beds. Effective targets require sufficient resource capacity and demand management, ignoring such constraints can lead to self-defeating, unjust policies.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div><span>National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands</span> (<span><span>NIHR200165</span></span>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 101368"},"PeriodicalIF":13.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776225001607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In 2002, the English National Health Service (NHS) introduced financial penalties for hospitals failing to provide elective operations within 28 days of last-minute cancellations. This study investigates the impact of this policy, the 2008 global recession, and the COVID-19 pandemic on cancelled operations and breaches of the 28-day standard.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective observational study using publicly available NHS England data from 1994 to 2023. Interrupted time series analysis assessed changes in cancelled operations and breaches of the 28-day standard across three key periods: pre- and post-2002 policy implementation, post-2008 recession, and post-COVID-19 pandemic. Subgroup analysis by hospital trust A&E department presence on breaches of the 28-day standard was performed.
Findings
Elective admissions nearly doubled over 30 years, rising from just over 1 million per quarter in 1994 (1,054,818) to almost 2 million in 2023 (1,975,508), an 87% increase. Cancellation rates increased leading up to the 2002 policy change but fell rapidly below 1% afterwards and remained stable. The 2008 recession and COVID-19 pandemic did not impact cancellation rates, but did increase breaches of the 28-day standard. Breaches rose before the 2002 policy, dropped rapidly afterwards (−9.6%, 95% CI: −11.2, −9.0), but increased after the recession and notably post-pandemic (13.0%, 95% CI: 4.9%, 21.0%), remaining high and negating earlier gains. Hospitals with A&E departments experienced higher post-pandemic increases in breach rates (12.7%, 95% CI: 10.8, 14.7) compared to those without (0.3%, 95% CI: −3.7, 4.4).
Interpretation
The 2002 policy effectively reduced breaches of the 28-day standard for many years but could not be maintained after the COVID-19 pandemic, when breach rates reached high levels, especially hospitals with A&E departments that could not protect elective beds. Effective targets require sufficient resource capacity and demand management, ignoring such constraints can lead to self-defeating, unjust policies.
Funding
National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands (NIHR200165).
期刊介绍:
The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, a gold open access journal, is part of The Lancet's global effort to promote healthcare quality and accessibility worldwide. It focuses on advancing clinical practice and health policy in the European region to enhance health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating changes in clinical practice and health policy. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces on regional health topics, such as infection and disease prevention, healthy aging, and reducing health disparities.