Exploring human–pollinator relationships: Synergies between beekeeping and wild pollinator conservation

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Costanza Geppert , Giacomo Ortis , Francesco Mainardi , Lorenzo Marini
{"title":"Exploring human–pollinator relationships: Synergies between beekeeping and wild pollinator conservation","authors":"Costanza Geppert ,&nbsp;Giacomo Ortis ,&nbsp;Francesco Mainardi ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Marini","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Beekeepers are at the front line of understanding pollinator health. While both wild pollinator conservation and beekeeping are essential to natural and managed ecosystems, their objectives can diverge, particularly when the honeybee is viewed as central rather than part of a broader pollinator community. Beekeepers' values for managed and wild pollinators can help understanding their engagement with conservation and solving emerging conflicts. We carried out in-depth interviews with 40 beekeepers in North-East Italy, including 20 commercial and 20 hobbyist, investigating their risk perception regarding the honeybees’ health, values for pollinators and willingness to protect wild pollinators. Although commercial and hobbyist beekeepers managed their operations differently, they shared the same concerns and values for pollinators. Respondents started beekeeping driven by interest or through connections with friends or family members and the vast majority considered their activity beneficial to local residents. Both commercial and hobbyist beekeepers expressed concern about climate-change and held strong relational values for the honeybee, supporting the importance of integrating relational values, such as stewardship and identity, when studying human-nature connections. Actions to conserve wild pollinators received a higher support when beneficial for the honeybee too, while specific actions targeting only wild pollinators were less supported. However, commercial beekeepers holding high intrinsic values for wild pollinators were more likely to help them. Overall, we identified synergies and areas where potential conflicts between conservationists and beekeepers can emerge. As beekeepers represent a crucial stakeholder group, collaborations and dialogues among people who value wild pollinators are needed to effectively protect them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103751"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725001913","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beekeepers are at the front line of understanding pollinator health. While both wild pollinator conservation and beekeeping are essential to natural and managed ecosystems, their objectives can diverge, particularly when the honeybee is viewed as central rather than part of a broader pollinator community. Beekeepers' values for managed and wild pollinators can help understanding their engagement with conservation and solving emerging conflicts. We carried out in-depth interviews with 40 beekeepers in North-East Italy, including 20 commercial and 20 hobbyist, investigating their risk perception regarding the honeybees’ health, values for pollinators and willingness to protect wild pollinators. Although commercial and hobbyist beekeepers managed their operations differently, they shared the same concerns and values for pollinators. Respondents started beekeeping driven by interest or through connections with friends or family members and the vast majority considered their activity beneficial to local residents. Both commercial and hobbyist beekeepers expressed concern about climate-change and held strong relational values for the honeybee, supporting the importance of integrating relational values, such as stewardship and identity, when studying human-nature connections. Actions to conserve wild pollinators received a higher support when beneficial for the honeybee too, while specific actions targeting only wild pollinators were less supported. However, commercial beekeepers holding high intrinsic values for wild pollinators were more likely to help them. Overall, we identified synergies and areas where potential conflicts between conservationists and beekeepers can emerge. As beekeepers represent a crucial stakeholder group, collaborations and dialogues among people who value wild pollinators are needed to effectively protect them.
探索人类传粉媒介的关系:养蜂和野生传粉媒介保护之间的协同作用
养蜂人处于了解传粉媒介健康状况的第一线。虽然保护野生传粉媒介和养蜂对自然和管理的生态系统都至关重要,但它们的目标可能会有所不同,特别是当蜜蜂被视为中心而不是更广泛的传粉媒介群落的一部分时。养蜂人对管理和野生传粉媒介的价值观可以帮助理解他们参与保护和解决新出现的冲突。我们对意大利东北部的40名养蜂人进行了深入访谈,其中包括20名商业养蜂人和20名业余养蜂人,调查了他们对蜜蜂健康的风险认知、对传粉媒介的价值以及保护野生传粉媒介的意愿。尽管商业养蜂人和业余养蜂人的经营方式不同,但他们对传粉媒介的关注和价值观是相同的。受访者开始养蜂是出于兴趣或通过与朋友或家人的联系,绝大多数人认为他们的活动对当地居民有益。商业养蜂人和业余养蜂人都表达了对气候变化的担忧,并对蜜蜂持有强烈的关系价值观,支持在研究人类与自然的关系时整合关系价值观的重要性,例如管理和身份。保护野生传粉媒介的行动在对蜜蜂有利的情况下也得到了更高的支持,而仅针对野生传粉媒介的具体行动得到的支持较少。然而,对野生传粉媒介具有较高内在价值的商业养蜂人更有可能帮助它们。总的来说,我们确定了协同作用和保护主义者和养蜂人之间可能出现潜在冲突的领域。由于养蜂人是一个重要的利益相关者群体,重视野生传粉媒介的人们之间需要开展合作和对话,以有效地保护它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信