How accurate is intraprocedural transthoracic echocardiography in assessing aortic regurgitation after transcathether aortic valve implantation? A single center experience

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Claire B. Ren, Mark M.P. van den Dorpel, Marcel Geleijnse, Nicolas M. van Mieghem
{"title":"How accurate is intraprocedural transthoracic echocardiography in assessing aortic regurgitation after transcathether aortic valve implantation? A single center experience","authors":"Claire B. Ren,&nbsp;Mark M.P. van den Dorpel,&nbsp;Marcel Geleijnse,&nbsp;Nicolas M. van Mieghem","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Aim Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been commonly used to assess the aortic regurgitation (AR), particularly paravalvular leakage, during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to investigate the accuracy of intraprocedural TTE to grade the AR severity by comparing with discharge TTE assessments.</div><div>Methods Consecutive patients received balloon expandable (BE) or self-expanding (SE) transcatheter heart valves with both intraprocedural TTE and discharge TTE AR assessments were included. The AR was assessed following the standard approach intraprocedurally by one dedicated interventional echocardiographer and at discharge by one echo-cardiologist.</div><div>Results In total 404 patients, the AR grade was concordant in about 2/3 of the population and discordance was mainly underestimation of AR severity with intraprocedural TTE. None or trace intraprocedural AR was more seen in patients with BE valves and the concordance with discharge assessment was also higher in BE valve group than that of the SE valve group. The discordance was mainly underestimation too, regardless of valve types.</div><div>Conclusion in our single-center real-world experience, the AR assessed with intraprocedural TTE was discordant with the discharge TTE in about 1/3 of the cases with predominantly underestimation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"438 ","pages":"Article 133565"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325006084","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has been commonly used to assess the aortic regurgitation (AR), particularly paravalvular leakage, during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We sought to investigate the accuracy of intraprocedural TTE to grade the AR severity by comparing with discharge TTE assessments.
Methods Consecutive patients received balloon expandable (BE) or self-expanding (SE) transcatheter heart valves with both intraprocedural TTE and discharge TTE AR assessments were included. The AR was assessed following the standard approach intraprocedurally by one dedicated interventional echocardiographer and at discharge by one echo-cardiologist.
Results In total 404 patients, the AR grade was concordant in about 2/3 of the population and discordance was mainly underestimation of AR severity with intraprocedural TTE. None or trace intraprocedural AR was more seen in patients with BE valves and the concordance with discharge assessment was also higher in BE valve group than that of the SE valve group. The discordance was mainly underestimation too, regardless of valve types.
Conclusion in our single-center real-world experience, the AR assessed with intraprocedural TTE was discordant with the discharge TTE in about 1/3 of the cases with predominantly underestimation.
术中经胸超声心动图评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术后主动脉反流的准确性如何?单中心体验
目的经胸超声心动图(TTE)通常用于评估经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中主动脉瓣反流(AR),特别是瓣旁渗漏。我们试图通过比较术中TTE与出院TTE评估来调查术中TTE分级AR严重程度的准确性。方法对连续接受球囊膨胀性(BE)或自膨胀性(SE)经导管心脏瓣膜的患者进行术中TTE和出院TTE AR评估。术中由一名专门的介入超声心动图医师和出院时由一名超声心动图医师按照标准方法评估AR。结果404例患者中,约2/3患者的AR分级一致,不一致主要是术中TTE对AR严重程度的低估。BE瓣膜组患者术中无AR或明显AR发生率高于SE瓣膜组,且BE瓣膜组与出院评估的一致性高于SE瓣膜组。无论瓣膜类型如何,这种不一致也主要是低估。结论在我们的单中心真实世界经验中,术中TTE评估的AR与出院TTE不一致的病例约占1/3,主要是低估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信