Sylvano Mania, Farah Selman, Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Stijn de Joode, Florian Grubhofer, Karl Wieser
{"title":"Semi-automated algorithm for rotational axis determination of the ulno-humeral joint","authors":"Sylvano Mania, Farah Selman, Franziska C.S. Altorfer, Stijn de Joode, Florian Grubhofer, Karl Wieser","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Preoperative simulation of the elbow joint motion has been proposed for prosthesis alignment, ligament reconstruction or treatment of impingement-inducing osteophytes. However, its daily application remains seldom. This study proposes an algorithm to simulate the ulno-humeral joint motion in flexion/extension.</div><div>Four observers placed reference points on 3D surface models of elbows. The algorithm generated five spheres representing specific joint surface: medial and lateral trochlea humeri (MT and LT), capitellum (CAP), medial and lateral trochlear notch (MED- and LAT NOTCH). Three rotational axes were defined: MT-LT, CAP-MT and MED-LAT NOTCH. A fourth axis, COMB, was computed using the average 3D distance between MT-MED NOTCH and LT-LAT NOTCH. Interobserver average distance between the reference points and the computed sphere as well as the average interobserver 3D angle between the axis were analysed. The dynamic articular congruence of the axes in relation to the MED-LAT NOTCH axis was assessed by calculating their respective 3D angle variation from 0° extension to 150° flexion. The number of patients needed to reach stable dynamic articular congruence was assessed.</div><div>The computed spheres exhibit lower interobserver average translation compared to the reference points. The CAP-MT axis shows the lowest interobserver variation of 3D angle (4.8°). However, COMB axis has the lowest dynamic articular incongruency (3D angle variation of 7.4°, p < 0.001). Once a learning curve of six patients is reached, an average congruence of 4.8° can be achieved.</div><div>An algorithm based on multiple articular references can reduce observer-induced inaccuracies in simulation of elbow joint motion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 112842"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021929025003549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Preoperative simulation of the elbow joint motion has been proposed for prosthesis alignment, ligament reconstruction or treatment of impingement-inducing osteophytes. However, its daily application remains seldom. This study proposes an algorithm to simulate the ulno-humeral joint motion in flexion/extension.
Four observers placed reference points on 3D surface models of elbows. The algorithm generated five spheres representing specific joint surface: medial and lateral trochlea humeri (MT and LT), capitellum (CAP), medial and lateral trochlear notch (MED- and LAT NOTCH). Three rotational axes were defined: MT-LT, CAP-MT and MED-LAT NOTCH. A fourth axis, COMB, was computed using the average 3D distance between MT-MED NOTCH and LT-LAT NOTCH. Interobserver average distance between the reference points and the computed sphere as well as the average interobserver 3D angle between the axis were analysed. The dynamic articular congruence of the axes in relation to the MED-LAT NOTCH axis was assessed by calculating their respective 3D angle variation from 0° extension to 150° flexion. The number of patients needed to reach stable dynamic articular congruence was assessed.
The computed spheres exhibit lower interobserver average translation compared to the reference points. The CAP-MT axis shows the lowest interobserver variation of 3D angle (4.8°). However, COMB axis has the lowest dynamic articular incongruency (3D angle variation of 7.4°, p < 0.001). Once a learning curve of six patients is reached, an average congruence of 4.8° can be achieved.
An algorithm based on multiple articular references can reduce observer-induced inaccuracies in simulation of elbow joint motion.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.