Who Learns from Deliberative Minipublics? Identity-Based Differences in Knowledge Gains across Thirteen Citizens' Initiative Review Experiments

IF 2.7 2区社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY

Sociological Science Pub Date : 2025-06-30 DOI:10.15195/v12.a17

Kristinn Már Ársælsson, John Gastil

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Voters often show low levels of accurate policy information owing to misinformation and directional motivated reasoning. Extant research shows that participants in randomly selected deliberative groups—commonly called

查看原文本刊更多论文

谁能从协商迷你公众中学习？13个公民主动性回顾实验中基于身份的知识收益差异

由于错误信息和定向动机推理，选民往往显示出低水平的准确政策信息。现存的研究表明，随机选择的审议小组的参与者通常被称为

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Sociological Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

2.90%

发文量

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.