Fernando G Zampieri,Peter M B Cahusac,Israel S Maia,Nadir Yehya,Nuala J Meyer,Fan Li,Michael O Harhay
{"title":"Trial Analysis and Interpretation in Critical Care Using the Evidential (Likelihood) Approach: Rationale and Practical Considerations.","authors":"Fernando G Zampieri,Peter M B Cahusac,Israel S Maia,Nadir Yehya,Nuala J Meyer,Fan Li,Michael O Harhay","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202504-0809tr","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selecting the optimal methodological framework for evidence synthesis presents a fundamental challenge in contemporary clinical research. In critical care, where many interventions yield inconclusive results under traditional p-value-based analyses, complementary analytical approaches can enhance our understanding of trial data. While frequentist statistics remain predominant and Bayesian methods have recently experienced a resurgence of interest, the evidential (or likelihood) framework offers a methodological perspective that potentially bridges these two inferential paradigms. In this Concise Translational Review, we introduce readers to the evidential approach. To present the evidential approach as an analytical tool for critical care trials, we demonstrate its application using data from two mechanical ventilation trials (the Alveolar Recruitment Trial [ART, n=1,010] and the STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA trial [STAMINA, n=214]) and one trial evaluating balanced solutions (Balanced Solutions in Intensive Care Study - BaSICS, n=10,520). We focus on how concepts and terminology translate across paradigms, the framework's measures of effect (i.e., likelihood ratios, support values, and S intervals), proposals for its use in sequential analysis and trial monitoring, and how to report results from this framework in research articles. We propose that the evidential framework provides a clinically intuitive approach to trial interpretation by focusing on the relative evidence between competing hypotheses, thereby offering additional and complementary insights that align with clinical reasoning processes. To facilitate implementation by the scientific community, we have developed an interactive Shiny (open-source web-based) application (https://fzampier.shinyapps.io/Likelihood_Shiny/). This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202504-0809tr","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Selecting the optimal methodological framework for evidence synthesis presents a fundamental challenge in contemporary clinical research. In critical care, where many interventions yield inconclusive results under traditional p-value-based analyses, complementary analytical approaches can enhance our understanding of trial data. While frequentist statistics remain predominant and Bayesian methods have recently experienced a resurgence of interest, the evidential (or likelihood) framework offers a methodological perspective that potentially bridges these two inferential paradigms. In this Concise Translational Review, we introduce readers to the evidential approach. To present the evidential approach as an analytical tool for critical care trials, we demonstrate its application using data from two mechanical ventilation trials (the Alveolar Recruitment Trial [ART, n=1,010] and the STrAtegy for coMmunIty acquired pNeumoniA trial [STAMINA, n=214]) and one trial evaluating balanced solutions (Balanced Solutions in Intensive Care Study - BaSICS, n=10,520). We focus on how concepts and terminology translate across paradigms, the framework's measures of effect (i.e., likelihood ratios, support values, and S intervals), proposals for its use in sequential analysis and trial monitoring, and how to report results from this framework in research articles. We propose that the evidential framework provides a clinically intuitive approach to trial interpretation by focusing on the relative evidence between competing hypotheses, thereby offering additional and complementary insights that align with clinical reasoning processes. To facilitate implementation by the scientific community, we have developed an interactive Shiny (open-source web-based) application (https://fzampier.shinyapps.io/Likelihood_Shiny/). This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.