Digging Deeper: Assessing Soil Quality in a Diversity of Conservation Agriculture Practices

IF 5.8 2区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.5194/egusphere-2025-2700
Manon S. Ferdinand, Brieuc F. Hardy, Philippe V. Baret
{"title":"Digging Deeper: Assessing Soil Quality in a Diversity of Conservation Agriculture Practices","authors":"Manon S. Ferdinand, Brieuc F. Hardy, Philippe V. Baret","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2025-2700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Conservation Agriculture (CA) aims to enhance soil quality through three main principles: minimizing mechanical soil disturbance, maximizing soil organic cover, and diversifying crop species. However, the diversity of practices within CA makes the effect on soil quality hardly predictable. In this study, an evaluation of soil quality in CA fields across Wallonia (Belgium) was conducted for four distinct CA-types. Three soil quality indicators were examined: the soil structural stability, the soil organic carbon:clay ratio (SOC:Clay), and the labile carbon fraction (POXC). Results revealed significant variations among CA-types. The CA-type characterized by substantial temporary grassland and tillage-extensive crops (e.g., cereals, meslin, rape, flax) in the crop sequence had the highest soil structural stability and SOC:Clay ratio. In contrast, the CA-type characterized by strict non-inversion tillage practices and frequent tillage-intensive crops (e.g., sugar beet, chicory, potatoes, carrots) had the lowest scores for the three indicators. Temporary grassland in the crop sequence appeared as the most influential factor improving soil quality. These findings highlight the need to consider the diversity of CA-type when evaluating the agronomic and environmental performance of CA systems, whose response depends on local soil and climatic conditions, the crops cultivated, and the specific combination of practices implemented.","PeriodicalId":48610,"journal":{"name":"Soil","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2700","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Conservation Agriculture (CA) aims to enhance soil quality through three main principles: minimizing mechanical soil disturbance, maximizing soil organic cover, and diversifying crop species. However, the diversity of practices within CA makes the effect on soil quality hardly predictable. In this study, an evaluation of soil quality in CA fields across Wallonia (Belgium) was conducted for four distinct CA-types. Three soil quality indicators were examined: the soil structural stability, the soil organic carbon:clay ratio (SOC:Clay), and the labile carbon fraction (POXC). Results revealed significant variations among CA-types. The CA-type characterized by substantial temporary grassland and tillage-extensive crops (e.g., cereals, meslin, rape, flax) in the crop sequence had the highest soil structural stability and SOC:Clay ratio. In contrast, the CA-type characterized by strict non-inversion tillage practices and frequent tillage-intensive crops (e.g., sugar beet, chicory, potatoes, carrots) had the lowest scores for the three indicators. Temporary grassland in the crop sequence appeared as the most influential factor improving soil quality. These findings highlight the need to consider the diversity of CA-type when evaluating the agronomic and environmental performance of CA systems, whose response depends on local soil and climatic conditions, the crops cultivated, and the specific combination of practices implemented.
深入挖掘:评估多样性保护性农业实践中的土壤质量
摘要。保护性农业(CA)旨在通过三个主要原则来提高土壤质量:尽量减少土壤的机械干扰,最大限度地增加土壤有机覆盖度,使作物品种多样化。然而,在CA内,实践的多样性使得对土壤质量的影响难以预测。在本研究中,对比利时瓦隆地区四种不同CA类型的CA田进行了土壤质量评价。考察了土壤结构稳定性、土壤有机碳与粘土比(SOC: clay)和土壤活性碳分数(POXC) 3个土壤质量指标。结果显示ca类型之间存在显著差异。在作物序列中,以大量临时草地和粗放型作物(如谷物、豆绒、油菜、亚麻)为特征的ca型土壤结构稳定性和有机碳:粘比最高。相比之下,严格实行不倒耕和频繁种植耕作密集型作物(如甜菜、菊苣、土豆、胡萝卜)的ca型在三项指标上得分最低。作物序列中的临时草地是改善土壤质量的最重要因素。这些发现强调,在评估CA系统的农艺和环境绩效时,需要考虑CA类型的多样性,其响应取决于当地土壤和气候条件、种植的作物以及实施的具体实践组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil
Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
44
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: SOIL is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research in the field of soil system sciences. SOIL is at the interface between the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. SOIL publishes scientific research that contributes to understanding the soil system and its interaction with humans and the entire Earth system. The scope of the journal includes all topics that fall within the study of soil science as a discipline, with an emphasis on studies that integrate soil science with other sciences (hydrology, agronomy, socio-economics, health sciences, atmospheric sciences, etc.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信