The Double Tidal Disruption Event AT 2022dbl Implies that at Least Some “Standard” Optical Tidal Disruption Events Are Partial Disruptions

Lydia Makrygianni, Iair Arcavi, Megan Newsome, Ananya Bandopadhyay, Eric R. Coughlin, Itai Linial, Brenna Mockler, Eliot Quataert, Chris Nixon, Benjamin Godson, Miika Pursiainen, Giorgos Leloudas, K. Decker French, Adi Zitrin, Sara Faris, Marco C. Lam, Assaf Horesh, Itai Sfaradi, Michael Fausnaugh, Ehud Nakar, Kendall Ackley, Moira Andrews, Panos Charalampopoulos, Benjamin D. R. Davies, Yael Dgany, Martin J. Dyer, Joseph Farah, Rob Fender, David A. Green, D. Andrew Howell, Thomas Killestein, Niilo Koivisto, Joseph Lyman, Curtis McCully, Morgan A. Mitchell, Estefania Padilla Gonzalez, Lauren Rhodes, Anwesha Sahu, Giacomo Terreran and Ben Warwick
{"title":"The Double Tidal Disruption Event AT 2022dbl Implies that at Least Some “Standard” Optical Tidal Disruption Events Are Partial Disruptions","authors":"Lydia Makrygianni, Iair Arcavi, Megan Newsome, Ananya Bandopadhyay, Eric R. Coughlin, Itai Linial, Brenna Mockler, Eliot Quataert, Chris Nixon, Benjamin Godson, Miika Pursiainen, Giorgos Leloudas, K. Decker French, Adi Zitrin, Sara Faris, Marco C. Lam, Assaf Horesh, Itai Sfaradi, Michael Fausnaugh, Ehud Nakar, Kendall Ackley, Moira Andrews, Panos Charalampopoulos, Benjamin D. R. Davies, Yael Dgany, Martin J. Dyer, Joseph Farah, Rob Fender, David A. Green, D. Andrew Howell, Thomas Killestein, Niilo Koivisto, Joseph Lyman, Curtis McCully, Morgan A. Mitchell, Estefania Padilla Gonzalez, Lauren Rhodes, Anwesha Sahu, Giacomo Terreran and Ben Warwick","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/ade155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flares produced following the tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes can reveal the properties of the otherwise dormant majority of black holes and the physics of accretion. In the past decade, a class of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares has been discovered whose emission properties do not match theoretical predictions. This has led to extensive efforts to model the dynamics and emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruptions in order to establish them as probes of supermassive black holes. Here we present the optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption event AT 2022dbl, which showed a nearly identical repetition 700 days after the first flare. Ruling out gravitational lensing and two chance unrelated disruptions, we conclude that at least the first flare represents the partial disruption of a star, possibly captured through the Hills mechanism. Since both flares are typical of the optical-ultraviolet class of tidal disruptions in terms of their radiated energy, temperature, luminosity, and spectral features, it follows that either the entire class are partial rather than full stellar disruptions, contrary to the prevalent assumption, or some members of the class are partial disruptions, having nearly the same observational characteristics as full disruptions. Whichever option is true, these findings could require revised models for the emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares and a reassessment of their expected rates.","PeriodicalId":501814,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ade155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flares produced following the tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes can reveal the properties of the otherwise dormant majority of black holes and the physics of accretion. In the past decade, a class of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares has been discovered whose emission properties do not match theoretical predictions. This has led to extensive efforts to model the dynamics and emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruptions in order to establish them as probes of supermassive black holes. Here we present the optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption event AT 2022dbl, which showed a nearly identical repetition 700 days after the first flare. Ruling out gravitational lensing and two chance unrelated disruptions, we conclude that at least the first flare represents the partial disruption of a star, possibly captured through the Hills mechanism. Since both flares are typical of the optical-ultraviolet class of tidal disruptions in terms of their radiated energy, temperature, luminosity, and spectral features, it follows that either the entire class are partial rather than full stellar disruptions, contrary to the prevalent assumption, or some members of the class are partial disruptions, having nearly the same observational characteristics as full disruptions. Whichever option is true, these findings could require revised models for the emission mechanisms of optical-ultraviolet tidal disruption flares and a reassessment of their expected rates.
2022dbl的双潮汐中断事件意味着至少一些“标准”光学潮汐中断事件是部分中断
超大质量黑洞潮汐破坏恒星后产生的耀斑可以揭示大多数休眠黑洞的特性和吸积物理学。在过去的十年中,一类光学紫外潮汐干扰耀斑被发现,其发射特性与理论预测不符。这导致了广泛的努力来模拟光学紫外潮汐破坏的动力学和发射机制,以便将它们建立为超大质量黑洞的探测器。在这里,我们展示了光紫外潮汐中断事件AT 2022dbl,它在第一次耀斑发生700天后显示了几乎相同的重复。排除引力透镜效应和两次不相关的干扰,我们得出结论,至少第一次耀斑代表了一颗恒星的部分干扰,可能是通过希尔斯机制捕获的。由于这两个耀斑在辐射能量、温度、光度和光谱特征方面都是典型的光紫外潮汐干扰,因此,要么整个类别是部分而不是完全恒星干扰,与普遍的假设相反,要么这类中的一些成员是部分干扰,与完全干扰具有几乎相同的观测特征。无论哪一种选择是正确的,这些发现可能需要修改光紫外潮汐破坏耀斑发射机制的模型,并重新评估其预期速率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信