Abortion adverse events associated with adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, and dupilumab during pregnancy: A pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system.

Drug discoveries & therapeutics Pub Date : 2025-07-04 Epub Date: 2025-06-29 DOI:10.5582/ddt.2025.01043
Qian Liu, Yang Wang, Panwei Hu, Peizhi He
{"title":"Abortion adverse events associated with adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, and dupilumab during pregnancy: A pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Qian Liu, Yang Wang, Panwei Hu, Peizhi He","doi":"10.5582/ddt.2025.01043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biologics are essential for managing immune-related inflammatory diseases during pregnancy to prevent disease progression and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, data on the safety of biologics in a broader population are limited. This study aims to evaluate abortion-related adverse events (AEs) associated with adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, and dupilumab, using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A disproportionality analysis was performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) to identify signals of abortion-related AEs. The time-to-onset profiles were assessed by analyzing the description and Weibull shape parameters (WSPs) for these events. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted, including drug-drug interaction studies, logistic regression, and a similar retrospective analysis using data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Disproportionality analysis revealed specific signals for abortion-related AEs associated with adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab. The drug-drug interaction analysis indicated that these biologics, particularly without methotrexate or prednisolone, increase the risk of abortion-related AEs. Logistic regression identified several factors influencing outcomes. The time-to-onset analysis revealed that dupilumab had an earlier onset of 62.5 days, while etanercept had a later onset at 184 days. WSPs analysis revealed that signals for adalimumab, ustekinumab, and dupilumab exhibited early failure-type features, indicating a decreasing risk of abortion-related AEs over time. In conclusion, adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab are associated with an increased risk of abortion-related adverse pregnancy outcomes, though the signals remain relatively weak. Further large-scale studies are needed to provide more definitive evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":520606,"journal":{"name":"Drug discoveries & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":"160-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug discoveries & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2025.01043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biologics are essential for managing immune-related inflammatory diseases during pregnancy to prevent disease progression and adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, data on the safety of biologics in a broader population are limited. This study aims to evaluate abortion-related adverse events (AEs) associated with adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, and dupilumab, using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A disproportionality analysis was performed using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) to identify signals of abortion-related AEs. The time-to-onset profiles were assessed by analyzing the description and Weibull shape parameters (WSPs) for these events. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted, including drug-drug interaction studies, logistic regression, and a similar retrospective analysis using data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Disproportionality analysis revealed specific signals for abortion-related AEs associated with adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab. The drug-drug interaction analysis indicated that these biologics, particularly without methotrexate or prednisolone, increase the risk of abortion-related AEs. Logistic regression identified several factors influencing outcomes. The time-to-onset analysis revealed that dupilumab had an earlier onset of 62.5 days, while etanercept had a later onset at 184 days. WSPs analysis revealed that signals for adalimumab, ustekinumab, and dupilumab exhibited early failure-type features, indicating a decreasing risk of abortion-related AEs over time. In conclusion, adalimumab, etanercept, and ustekinumab are associated with an increased risk of abortion-related adverse pregnancy outcomes, though the signals remain relatively weak. Further large-scale studies are needed to provide more definitive evidence.

妊娠期间与阿达木单抗、依那西普、乌斯特金单抗和杜匹单抗相关的流产不良事件:基于FDA不良事件报告系统的药物警戒研究
生物制剂是必不可少的管理免疫相关炎症疾病在怀孕期间,以防止疾病进展和不良妊娠结局。然而,关于生物制剂在更广泛人群中的安全性的数据有限。本研究旨在利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中的数据,评估与阿达木单抗、依那西普、乌斯特金单抗和杜匹单抗相关的流产相关不良事件(ae)。使用报告优势比(ROR)和贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)进行歧化分析,以识别与流产相关的ae信号。通过分析这些事件的描述和威布尔形状参数(WSPs)来评估发生时间分布。敏感性分析也进行了,包括药物-药物相互作用研究、逻辑回归和类似的回顾性分析,数据来自日本不良药物事件报告(JADER)数据库。不成比例分析揭示了阿达木单抗、依那西普和乌斯特金单抗相关流产相关ae的特异性信号。药物-药物相互作用分析表明,这些生物制剂,特别是不含甲氨蝶呤或强的松龙的生物制剂,会增加流产相关不良反应的风险。逻辑回归确定了影响结果的几个因素。起效时间分析显示,dupilumab的起效较早,为62.5天,而依那西普的起效较晚,为184天。WSPs分析显示阿达木单抗、乌斯特金单抗和杜匹单抗的信号表现出早期衰竭类型特征,表明随着时间的推移流产相关ae的风险降低。总之,阿达木单抗、依那西普和乌斯特金单抗与流产相关不良妊娠结局的风险增加有关,尽管信号仍然相对较弱。需要进一步的大规模研究来提供更明确的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信