Engaging English- and Spanish-speaking older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in advance care planning group visits: Protocol for the ENgaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hillary Lum, Samantha Farro, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Chandni Patel, Brianne Bettcher, Christine Haynes, Amy Huebschmann, David Nowels, Caroline Tietbohl, Jiayuan Shi, Carly Ritger, Prajakta Shanbhag, Kathleen Resman, Rebecca Sudore
{"title":"Engaging English- and Spanish-speaking older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in advance care planning group visits: Protocol for the ENgaging in Advance Care Planning Talks (ENACT) Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hillary Lum, Samantha Farro, Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga, Chandni Patel, Brianne Bettcher, Christine Haynes, Amy Huebschmann, David Nowels, Caroline Tietbohl, Jiayuan Shi, Carly Ritger, Prajakta Shanbhag, Kathleen Resman, Rebecca Sudore","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6560971/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advance care planning (ACP) helps patients identify and communicate their preferences for medical care and prepares them for decision-making related to future care. While ACP is recommended for older adults with cognitive impairment, few interventions have been tested in primary care for this population. The ENACT trial tests the efficacy of the ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits intervention, which engages older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in group medical visits focused on the ACP process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This two-arm randomized trial compares the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention arm to a control arm at 6-month follow-up. The trial will enroll at least 480 patients across 8 primary care clinics. Notable inclusion criteria include English or Spanish-speaking, age 70 or older, and no ACP documents in the electronic health record (EHR) in the past 2 years. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment screener will be administered at study enrollment to identify whether the participant has possible cognitive impairment. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the ENACT Group Visits arm or control arm. The ENACT Group Visits intervention entails two group visits, facilitated by multidisciplinary clinic staff. The control arm entails sending ACP materials via mail. The primary outcome is new documentation of ACP in the EHR at 6-month follow up, and it will be analyzed using logistic regression with random effects for site. Secondary outcomes include patient-level ACP readiness, decision self-efficacy, and quality of communication. The impact of possible cognitive impairment on ENACT intervention efficacy will be examined. Survival analyses will be used to examine time-to-new ACP documentation. Mixed methods, including multiple qualitative methods, will be used to assess acceptability, feasibility, intervention fidelity, and other implementation outcomes of the ENACT intervention among patients with possible cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study will determine the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention among diverse older adults, including those with possible cognitive impairment, as evidenced by increased documentation of ACP in the medical record. If efficacious, primary care clinics may implement this ACP intervention that leverages peer interactions and goal setting to support a person-centered ACP process.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05421728. Registered on 13 June 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05421728.</p>","PeriodicalId":519972,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6560971/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advance care planning (ACP) helps patients identify and communicate their preferences for medical care and prepares them for decision-making related to future care. While ACP is recommended for older adults with cognitive impairment, few interventions have been tested in primary care for this population. The ENACT trial tests the efficacy of the ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks (ENACT) Group Visits intervention, which engages older adults with and without possible cognitive impairment in group medical visits focused on the ACP process.

Methods: This two-arm randomized trial compares the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention arm to a control arm at 6-month follow-up. The trial will enroll at least 480 patients across 8 primary care clinics. Notable inclusion criteria include English or Spanish-speaking, age 70 or older, and no ACP documents in the electronic health record (EHR) in the past 2 years. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment screener will be administered at study enrollment to identify whether the participant has possible cognitive impairment. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to the ENACT Group Visits arm or control arm. The ENACT Group Visits intervention entails two group visits, facilitated by multidisciplinary clinic staff. The control arm entails sending ACP materials via mail. The primary outcome is new documentation of ACP in the EHR at 6-month follow up, and it will be analyzed using logistic regression with random effects for site. Secondary outcomes include patient-level ACP readiness, decision self-efficacy, and quality of communication. The impact of possible cognitive impairment on ENACT intervention efficacy will be examined. Survival analyses will be used to examine time-to-new ACP documentation. Mixed methods, including multiple qualitative methods, will be used to assess acceptability, feasibility, intervention fidelity, and other implementation outcomes of the ENACT intervention among patients with possible cognitive impairment.

Discussion: This study will determine the efficacy of the ENACT Group Visits intervention among diverse older adults, including those with possible cognitive impairment, as evidenced by increased documentation of ACP in the medical record. If efficacious, primary care clinics may implement this ACP intervention that leverages peer interactions and goal setting to support a person-centered ACP process.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05421728. Registered on 13 June 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05421728.

参与有或无认知障碍的英语和西班牙语老年人提前护理计划小组访问:参与提前护理计划会谈(ENACT)随机对照试验的协议。
预先护理计划(ACP)帮助患者识别和沟通他们对医疗护理的偏好,并为他们未来护理相关的决策做好准备。虽然ACP被推荐用于有认知障碍的老年人,但很少有干预措施在这一人群的初级保健中进行过测试。ENACT试验测试了参与预先护理计划谈话(ENACT)小组访问干预的效果,该干预让有和没有可能的认知障碍的老年人参加以ACP过程为重点的小组医疗访问。方法采用随机对照法对ENACT组访干预组和对照组进行为期6个月的随访。该试验将在8个初级保健诊所招募至少480名患者。值得注意的纳入标准包括英语或西班牙语,年龄70岁或以上,过去2年内电子健康记录(EHR)中没有ACP文件。蒙特利尔认知评估筛查将在研究入组时进行,以确定参与者是否有可能存在认知障碍。参与者将以1:1的比例随机分配到ENACT小组访问组或对照组。ENACT小组访问干预包括两次小组访问,由多学科诊所工作人员提供便利。控制臂需要通过邮件发送ACP材料。主要结果是6个月随访时电子病历中ACP的新记录,并使用随机效应的逻辑回归对其进行分析。次要结局包括患者ACP准备程度、决策自我效能和沟通质量。我们将研究可能的认知障碍对ENACT干预效果的影响。生存分析将用于检查新ACP文件的时间。将采用混合方法,包括多种定性方法,评估ENACT干预在可能存在认知障碍的患者中的可接受性、可行性、干预保真度和其他实施结果。本研究将确定ENACT小组访问干预在不同老年人中的效果,包括那些可能有认知障碍的老年人,这可以通过医疗记录中ACP的增加来证明。如果有效,初级保健诊所可以实施这种ACP干预,利用同伴互动和目标设定来支持以人为本的ACP过程。临床试验网站:NCT05421728。于2022年6月13日注册,网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05421728。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信