Differential contribution of working memory to auditory rhythm discrimination in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.

Emily Garnett, Toni Smith, Bailey Rann, Nicholas Mularoni, Soo-Eun Chang, J Devin McAuley
{"title":"Differential contribution of working memory to auditory rhythm discrimination in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.","authors":"Emily Garnett, Toni Smith, Bailey Rann, Nicholas Mularoni, Soo-Eun Chang, J Devin McAuley","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-6686913/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stuttering is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by involuntary disruptions in the rhythmic flow of speech. Notably, stuttering is associated with aberrant structure and function of the basal ganglia thalamocortical network. Separately, the BGTC network has been implicated in non-speech beat and rhythm perception. Supporting a link between the two sets of findings, children who stutter exhibit poorer auditory rhythm discrimination compared to non-stutterers, especially for complex rhythms without a consistently marked beat. For adults who stutter (AWS), data showing a link between stuttering and poorer auditory rhythm discrimination has been mixed. One possible reason may be that AWS have developed strategies for rhythm discrimination that leverage an alternative non-BGTC network dependent timing mechanism. One candidate from the timing literature is the use of an interval-based mechanism that involves the cerebellum. From this perspective, rhythm discrimination judgments for AWS would involve interval-by-interval duration comparisons, which should be expected to place a greater burden on working memory compared to the more automatic beat-based timing processes implemented by the BGTC network. To investigate this hypothesis, we combined data from three studies where AWS and age-matched controls performed the same rhythm discrimination and working memory tasks. Across studies, AWS, as hypothesized, showed a significantly stronger positive correlation between working memory and rhythm discrimination than controls where there were no (or very weak) correlations. Moreover, separate group comparison of rhythm discrimination performance for AWS with high and low working memory scores reveals no difference between controls and AWS with high working memory scores, but much poorer performance by AWS with low working memory scores compared to controls. These results support the view that AWS may mask difficulties in rhythm perception and an underlying impairment in beat-based timing by leveraging a distinct working memory dependent interval timing mechanism to discriminate rhythms.</p>","PeriodicalId":519972,"journal":{"name":"Research square","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research square","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6686913/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stuttering is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by involuntary disruptions in the rhythmic flow of speech. Notably, stuttering is associated with aberrant structure and function of the basal ganglia thalamocortical network. Separately, the BGTC network has been implicated in non-speech beat and rhythm perception. Supporting a link between the two sets of findings, children who stutter exhibit poorer auditory rhythm discrimination compared to non-stutterers, especially for complex rhythms without a consistently marked beat. For adults who stutter (AWS), data showing a link between stuttering and poorer auditory rhythm discrimination has been mixed. One possible reason may be that AWS have developed strategies for rhythm discrimination that leverage an alternative non-BGTC network dependent timing mechanism. One candidate from the timing literature is the use of an interval-based mechanism that involves the cerebellum. From this perspective, rhythm discrimination judgments for AWS would involve interval-by-interval duration comparisons, which should be expected to place a greater burden on working memory compared to the more automatic beat-based timing processes implemented by the BGTC network. To investigate this hypothesis, we combined data from three studies where AWS and age-matched controls performed the same rhythm discrimination and working memory tasks. Across studies, AWS, as hypothesized, showed a significantly stronger positive correlation between working memory and rhythm discrimination than controls where there were no (or very weak) correlations. Moreover, separate group comparison of rhythm discrimination performance for AWS with high and low working memory scores reveals no difference between controls and AWS with high working memory scores, but much poorer performance by AWS with low working memory scores compared to controls. These results support the view that AWS may mask difficulties in rhythm perception and an underlying impairment in beat-based timing by leveraging a distinct working memory dependent interval timing mechanism to discriminate rhythms.

工作记忆对口吃和非口吃成人听觉节奏辨别的差异贡献。
口吃是一种神经发育疾病,其特征是不自觉地中断了有节奏的语言流。值得注意的是,口吃与基底节区丘脑皮质网络的结构和功能异常有关。另外,BGTC网络与非言语节奏和节奏感知有关。与非口吃儿童相比,口吃儿童表现出较差的听觉节奏辨别能力,特别是对于没有持续明显节拍的复杂节奏,这支持了两组研究结果之间的联系。对于口吃的成年人(AWS),数据显示口吃和较差的听觉节奏辨别之间的联系是混合的。一个可能的原因可能是AWS已经开发出了一种利用非bgtc网络依赖的定时机制的节奏识别策略。计时文献中的一个候选是使用涉及小脑的基于间隔的机制。从这个角度来看,对AWS的节奏辨别判断将涉及间隔间的持续时间比较,与BGTC网络实现的更自动的基于节拍的计时过程相比,这应该会给工作记忆带来更大的负担。为了研究这一假设,我们结合了三项研究的数据,其中AWS和年龄匹配的对照组执行相同的节奏辨别和工作记忆任务。在所有研究中,正如假设的那样,与没有(或非常微弱)相关性的对照组相比,AWS显示出工作记忆和节奏辨别之间明显更强的正相关性。此外,工作记忆得分高和低的AWS的节奏辨别表现的单独组比较显示,对照组与工作记忆得分高的AWS之间没有差异,但工作记忆得分低的AWS的表现比对照组差得多。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即AWS可能通过利用一种独特的依赖于工作记忆的间隔计时机制来区分节奏,从而掩盖了节奏感知的困难和基于节拍的计时的潜在损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信