{"title":"Effect of lidocaine ice button topical anesthesia on pain during maxillary buccal infiltration in 6-10-year children - A randomized control trial.","authors":"Devendra I Nagpal, Samiksha Ram Dharampuria, Prabhat Singh, Purva Chaudhari, Pooja Rathi, Ayushi Gurharikar","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_119_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Effective pain management in children during local anesthetic administration would be a key to a successful and painless dental procedure. Precooling (PC) has emerged as pain control tool in dentistry.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of lidocaine Ice button and lidocaine gel as topical anesthesia during maxillary buccal infiltration in children.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Randomized crossover trial, department of pediatric and preventive dentistry.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Thirty children [60 local anesthesia (LA) injections] aged 6-10 years requiring bilateral maxillary buccal infiltration for dental procedure, divided into 2 groups with equal distribution for this split-mouth study. The study group was lidocaine ice button topical anesthesia; the control group was the lidocaine gel group. Subjective pain was evaluated using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, objective pain evaluation was done using Sound Eye and Motor (SEM) scale. Anxiety assessment using Venham picture test (VPT) and physiologic parameters such as SpO2 and Heart rate were evaluated before, during, and after administration of LA. Acceptance of lidocaine ice button was evaluated using a customized validated questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Data recorded in Microsoft Excel 365 and subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Product and service solution SPSS version 21.0 with P value considered statistically significant at < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in pain on injection for both objective and subjective evaluations in the Lidocaine Ice Button group, as topical anesthesia was seen (P < 0.00011) Majority of the children preferred the use of Lidocaine ice button as a topical anesthetic. No difference in pain was observed in groups based on treatment sequence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less pain on injection was observed, proving the efficacy of lidocaine ice button as topical anesthesia for maxillary infiltration in the study. Lidocaine ice button was well accepted by the children as topical anesthesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":101311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"43 2","pages":"261-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_119_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Effective pain management in children during local anesthetic administration would be a key to a successful and painless dental procedure. Precooling (PC) has emerged as pain control tool in dentistry.
Aims: This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of lidocaine Ice button and lidocaine gel as topical anesthesia during maxillary buccal infiltration in children.
Settings and design: Randomized crossover trial, department of pediatric and preventive dentistry.
Subjects and methods: Thirty children [60 local anesthesia (LA) injections] aged 6-10 years requiring bilateral maxillary buccal infiltration for dental procedure, divided into 2 groups with equal distribution for this split-mouth study. The study group was lidocaine ice button topical anesthesia; the control group was the lidocaine gel group. Subjective pain was evaluated using Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, objective pain evaluation was done using Sound Eye and Motor (SEM) scale. Anxiety assessment using Venham picture test (VPT) and physiologic parameters such as SpO2 and Heart rate were evaluated before, during, and after administration of LA. Acceptance of lidocaine ice button was evaluated using a customized validated questionnaire.
Statistical analysis used: Data recorded in Microsoft Excel 365 and subjected to statistical analysis using Statistical Product and service solution SPSS version 21.0 with P value considered statistically significant at < 0.05.
Results: A significant reduction in pain on injection for both objective and subjective evaluations in the Lidocaine Ice Button group, as topical anesthesia was seen (P < 0.00011) Majority of the children preferred the use of Lidocaine ice button as a topical anesthetic. No difference in pain was observed in groups based on treatment sequence.
Conclusions: Less pain on injection was observed, proving the efficacy of lidocaine ice button as topical anesthesia for maxillary infiltration in the study. Lidocaine ice button was well accepted by the children as topical anesthesia.
背景:儿童局麻b政府将期间有效的疼痛管理是成功和无痛牙科手术的关键。预冷(PC)已成为牙科疼痛控制工具。目的:评价和比较利多卡因冰扣和利多卡因凝胶在儿童上颌颊部浸润术中的表面麻醉效果。环境和设计:随机交叉试验,儿科和预防牙科。对象和方法:30名6-10岁需要双侧上颌颊部浸润进行牙科手术的儿童[60次局部麻醉(LA)注射],分为两组,平均分布。研究组采用利多卡因冰扣表面麻醉;对照组为利多卡因凝胶组。主观疼痛评定采用Wong-Baker面部疼痛评定量表,客观疼痛评定采用声眼运动量表。在给药前、给药期间和给药后分别用Venham图像测验(VPT)和生理参数SpO2、心率进行焦虑评估。使用定制的有效问卷评估利多卡因冰按钮的接受度。采用的统计分析:数据在Microsoft Excel 365中记录,使用Statistical Product and service solution SPSS version 21.0进行统计分析,P值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:在客观和主观评价中,利多卡因冰扣组的注射疼痛明显减轻,因为表面麻醉(P < 0.00011)大多数儿童倾向于使用利多卡因冰扣作为表面麻醉。根据治疗顺序,各组疼痛无差异。结论:注射后疼痛减轻,证明了利多卡因冰扣用于上颌浸润表面麻醉的有效性。利多卡因冰扣作为表面麻醉患儿接受度较高。