Comparative evaluation of eggshell-derived nano-hydroxyapatite and amniotic membrane as pulpotomy agents in primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial.

Sk Rabiya Shaheen, A J Sai Sankar, Vivekanand Kattimani, E Sridevi, K Pranitha, K Siva Sankar
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of eggshell-derived nano-hydroxyapatite and amniotic membrane as pulpotomy agents in primary teeth: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Sk Rabiya Shaheen, A J Sai Sankar, Vivekanand Kattimani, E Sridevi, K Pranitha, K Siva Sankar","doi":"10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_107_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the clinical success of existing pulpotomy medicaments, the search for novel and economically viable alternatives continues. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of eggshell-derived nano-hydroxyapatite (EnHA) and amniotic membrane (AM) as pulpotomy agents in primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 44 primary molars from 21 children aged 5-10 years, each presenting with at least two decayed primary molars requiring pulp therapy. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (EnHA) and Group II (AM), with 22 molars in each group. The standard pulpotomy procedure was performed on all selected teeth, and the clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 months posttreatment. The data were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test and Cochran's Q test to determine intergroup differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 9-month follow-up, Groups I and II showed a clinical success rate of 90%, and 85% respectively. Radiographically, the success rate was 85% for Group I and 75% for Group II. No statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) was noticed between the clinical and radiographic outcomes in both the groups, indicating similar efficacy between the materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both EnHA and AM demonstrated comparable clinical and radiographic success rates. These findings suggest that both materials may serve as promising, cost-effective alternatives to conventional pulpotomy agents in primary teeth, offering a biologically based approach to pulp therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":101311,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","volume":"43 2","pages":"276-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_107_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the clinical success of existing pulpotomy medicaments, the search for novel and economically viable alternatives continues. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of eggshell-derived nano-hydroxyapatite (EnHA) and amniotic membrane (AM) as pulpotomy agents in primary teeth.

Materials and methods: The study included 44 primary molars from 21 children aged 5-10 years, each presenting with at least two decayed primary molars requiring pulp therapy. The teeth were randomly assigned to two groups: Group I (EnHA) and Group II (AM), with 22 molars in each group. The standard pulpotomy procedure was performed on all selected teeth, and the clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 9 months posttreatment. The data were statistically analyzed using the Chi-square test and Cochran's Q test to determine intergroup differences.

Results: At the 9-month follow-up, Groups I and II showed a clinical success rate of 90%, and 85% respectively. Radiographically, the success rate was 85% for Group I and 75% for Group II. No statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) was noticed between the clinical and radiographic outcomes in both the groups, indicating similar efficacy between the materials.

Conclusion: Both EnHA and AM demonstrated comparable clinical and radiographic success rates. These findings suggest that both materials may serve as promising, cost-effective alternatives to conventional pulpotomy agents in primary teeth, offering a biologically based approach to pulp therapy.

蛋壳源纳米羟基磷灰石与羊膜作为乳牙截髓剂的比较评价:一项随机临床试验。
背景:尽管现有的牙髓切开术药物在临床取得了成功,但人们仍在寻找新的、经济可行的替代方案。本研究旨在评价和比较蛋壳源性纳米羟基磷灰石(EnHA)和羊膜(AM)作为乳牙切髓剂的疗效。材料和方法:本研究包括21名5-10岁儿童的44颗初生磨牙,每名儿童至少有两颗初生磨牙需要髓治疗。牙齿随机分为两组:I组(EnHA)和II组(AM),每组22磨牙。对所有选择的牙齿进行标准的牙髓切开术,并在治疗后3、6和9个月评估临床和影像学结果。采用卡方检验和科克伦Q检验对数据进行统计学分析,以确定组间差异。结果:随访9个月,I组和II组临床成功率分别为90%和85%。放射学上,组I和组II的成功率分别为85%和75%。两组临床与影像学结果比较差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05),说明两种材料疗效相近。结论:EnHA和AM具有相当的临床和放射学成功率。这些研究结果表明,这两种材料都可以作为一种有前途的、具有成本效益的替代方法来替代传统的乳牙牙髓切开术,为牙髓治疗提供了一种基于生物学的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信