Giselle Ramirez, Valerie Builoff, Robert Jh Miller, Mark Lemley, Isabel Carvajal-Juarez, Erick Alexanderson, Thomas L Rosamond, Na Song, Mark I Travin, Leandro Slipczuk, Andrew J Einstein, Samuel Wopperer, Marcelo Di Carli, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Piotr Slomka
{"title":"Multicenter Evaluation of Myocardial Flow Reserve as a Prognostic Marker for Mortality in ¹³N-Ammonia PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.","authors":"Giselle Ramirez, Valerie Builoff, Robert Jh Miller, Mark Lemley, Isabel Carvajal-Juarez, Erick Alexanderson, Thomas L Rosamond, Na Song, Mark I Travin, Leandro Slipczuk, Andrew J Einstein, Samuel Wopperer, Marcelo Di Carli, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Piotr Slomka","doi":"10.1101/2025.06.24.25330229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), measured by PET MPI, provides valuable information on epicardial coronary disease, diffuse atherosclerosis, and microvascular function. Despite its routine use, the prognostic efficacy of <sup>13</sup> N-ammonia PET MFR remains unconfirmed in larger multicenter cohorts of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We considered patients from five sites in the REFINE PET registry who underwent <sup>13</sup> N-ammonia PET MPI for CAD. Clinical and imaging data were collected at the time of MPI. MFR was quantified as the ratio of stress to rest myocardial blood flow, using QPET software (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models adjusted for clinical and imaging covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 6277 patients were included (mean age of 64 years, 56% male). Median follow-up time was 3.8 years. There were 1895 patients with MFR ≤2 and 4382 with MFR >2. Patients with MFR ≤2 had significantly higher mortality than those with MFR >2 (n=701 [37.0%] vs. n=537 [12.3%], respectively; p<0.001). Annualized ACM rates by MFR and SSS ranged from 1.7 to 11.6. In multivariable analysis, MFR ≤2 was independently associated with increased ACM in the overall population (HR 2.70, 95% CI 2.41-3.03, p<0.001), even among patients with no perfusion defects (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.93-2.89; p<0.001). Mortality risk decreased across increasing MFR deciles ranging from HR 2.73 (95% CI 2.39-3.11) to HR 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large multicenter cohort, MFR derived from <sup>13</sup> N-ammonia PET MPI is a strong, independent predictor of ACM, even in patients with normal perfusion. An MFR of ≤2.0 identifies elevated risk, while higher values are associated with improved survival. These findings support the routine integration of MFR to enhance risk stratification in patients with suspected or known CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.24.25330229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Myocardial flow reserve (MFR), measured by PET MPI, provides valuable information on epicardial coronary disease, diffuse atherosclerosis, and microvascular function. Despite its routine use, the prognostic efficacy of 13 N-ammonia PET MFR remains unconfirmed in larger multicenter cohorts of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD).
Methods: We considered patients from five sites in the REFINE PET registry who underwent 13 N-ammonia PET MPI for CAD. Clinical and imaging data were collected at the time of MPI. MFR was quantified as the ratio of stress to rest myocardial blood flow, using QPET software (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality (ACM). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models adjusted for clinical and imaging covariates.
Results: In total, 6277 patients were included (mean age of 64 years, 56% male). Median follow-up time was 3.8 years. There were 1895 patients with MFR ≤2 and 4382 with MFR >2. Patients with MFR ≤2 had significantly higher mortality than those with MFR >2 (n=701 [37.0%] vs. n=537 [12.3%], respectively; p<0.001). Annualized ACM rates by MFR and SSS ranged from 1.7 to 11.6. In multivariable analysis, MFR ≤2 was independently associated with increased ACM in the overall population (HR 2.70, 95% CI 2.41-3.03, p<0.001), even among patients with no perfusion defects (HR 2.36, 95% CI 1.93-2.89; p<0.001). Mortality risk decreased across increasing MFR deciles ranging from HR 2.73 (95% CI 2.39-3.11) to HR 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.49).
Conclusion: In this large multicenter cohort, MFR derived from 13 N-ammonia PET MPI is a strong, independent predictor of ACM, even in patients with normal perfusion. An MFR of ≤2.0 identifies elevated risk, while higher values are associated with improved survival. These findings support the routine integration of MFR to enhance risk stratification in patients with suspected or known CAD.
背景:心肌血流储备(MFR),通过PET MPI测量,为心外膜冠状动脉疾病、弥漫性动脉粥样硬化和微血管功能提供了有价值的信息。尽管其常规使用,13 n -氨PET MFR在疑似或已知冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的更大的多中心队列中的预后效果仍未得到证实。方法:我们考虑了精制PET登记的5个地点的患者,他们接受了13次n -氨PET MPI治疗CAD。在MPI时收集临床和影像学资料。使用QPET软件(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA)将MFR量化为应激与静止心肌血流量之比。主要终点为全因死亡率(ACM)。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归模型进行生存分析,校正临床和影像学协变量。结果:共纳入6277例患者,平均年龄64岁,男性占56%。中位随访时间为3.8年。MFR≤2的患者1895例,MFR≤2的患者4382例。MFR≤2的患者死亡率明显高于MFR≤2的患者(n=701 [37.0%] vs. n=537 [12.3%]);结论:在这个大型多中心队列中,即使在灌注正常的患者中,由13 n -氨PET MPI得出的MFR也是ACM的一个强有力的独立预测因子。MFR≤2.0表明风险升高,而较高的值与生存率提高相关。这些发现支持MFR的常规整合,以加强疑似或已知CAD患者的风险分层。