Luciana B Vargas, Mariah C Meyer, Iain R Konigsberg, Aastha Kakar, Patrick M Carry, Yun Li, Alana C Jones, Hemant K Tiwari, Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra, Nicole D Armstrong, Eimear E Kenny, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Marguerite R Irvin, Michael H Cho, Maggie A Stanislawski, Sridharan Raghavan, Jonathan A Shortt, Leslie A Lange, Ethan M Lange
{"title":"Ancestry Calibration of Polygenic Risk Scores Improves Risk Stratification and Effect Estimation in African American Adults.","authors":"Luciana B Vargas, Mariah C Meyer, Iain R Konigsberg, Aastha Kakar, Patrick M Carry, Yun Li, Alana C Jones, Hemant K Tiwari, Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra, Nicole D Armstrong, Eimear E Kenny, Bogdan Pasaniuc, Marguerite R Irvin, Michael H Cho, Maggie A Stanislawski, Sridharan Raghavan, Jonathan A Shortt, Leslie A Lange, Ethan M Lange","doi":"10.1101/2025.06.18.25329573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polygenic risk score (PRS) distributions vary across populations, complicating PRS risk assessment. We evaluated the impact of <i>post-hoc</i> PRS calibration according to individualized genetic ancestry estimates on PRS performance using two large multi-ethnic PRS for type 2 diabetes (T2D) (PRS <sub>T2D</sub> ) and height (PRS <sub>height</sub> ), in 8,841 African American (AA) individuals from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. We calibrated each participant's score as a function of estimated genetic similarity to the Yoruba (GSYRI) cohort in the 1000 Genomes Project. Uncalibrated PRSs were significantly skewed by GSYRI. After calibration, 33.6% of individuals in the top decile of PRS <sub>T2D</sub> were reclassified and performance in the top PRS <sub>T2D</sub> decile improved from an OR of 7.97 [6.31-10.13] to 10.77 [8.41- 13.91] when compared to the lowest decile. Similarly, 55.0% of individuals in the top PRS <sub>height</sub> decile were reclassified with GSYRI calibration. The calibrated PRS <sub>height</sub> showed higher correlation with height (from 0.24 to 0.32, <i>p</i> <10 <sup>-7</sup> ), and increased mean height in the top PRS <sub>height</sub> decile ( <i>p</i> =5.7×10 <sup>-5</sup> ) when compared to the uncalibrated PRS <sub>height</sub> . Lastly, we show that evaluating uncalibrated PRS while adjusting for GSYRI in regression models can lead to inflated and unstable effect size estimates for both the PRS and GSYRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204301/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.06.18.25329573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Polygenic risk score (PRS) distributions vary across populations, complicating PRS risk assessment. We evaluated the impact of post-hoc PRS calibration according to individualized genetic ancestry estimates on PRS performance using two large multi-ethnic PRS for type 2 diabetes (T2D) (PRS T2D ) and height (PRS height ), in 8,841 African American (AA) individuals from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. We calibrated each participant's score as a function of estimated genetic similarity to the Yoruba (GSYRI) cohort in the 1000 Genomes Project. Uncalibrated PRSs were significantly skewed by GSYRI. After calibration, 33.6% of individuals in the top decile of PRS T2D were reclassified and performance in the top PRS T2D decile improved from an OR of 7.97 [6.31-10.13] to 10.77 [8.41- 13.91] when compared to the lowest decile. Similarly, 55.0% of individuals in the top PRS height decile were reclassified with GSYRI calibration. The calibrated PRS height showed higher correlation with height (from 0.24 to 0.32, p <10 -7 ), and increased mean height in the top PRS height decile ( p =5.7×10 -5 ) when compared to the uncalibrated PRS height . Lastly, we show that evaluating uncalibrated PRS while adjusting for GSYRI in regression models can lead to inflated and unstable effect size estimates for both the PRS and GSYRI.