Allegra Comba, Jessica Giannatiempo, Andrea Dirutigliano, Andrea Baldi, Mario Alovisi, Nicola Scotti, Annalisa Mazzoni, Lorenzo Breschi, Leila Es Sebar, Damiano Pasqualini
{"title":"12 Months Results of Bond Strength and Endogenous Enzymatic Activity of Radicular Dentin Obturated With Bioceramic Sealer.","authors":"Allegra Comba, Jessica Giannatiempo, Andrea Dirutigliano, Andrea Baldi, Mario Alovisi, Nicola Scotti, Annalisa Mazzoni, Lorenzo Breschi, Leila Es Sebar, Damiano Pasqualini","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.c_2128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluation of radicular bond strength and dentinal matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) activity with different endodontic sealers (traditional vs bioceramic), filling techniques (warm vs cold), and adhesive protocols (self-etch vs etch-and-rinse), after 24 hours and after one year (T0 vs T1).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>96 extracted, caries-free, single-rooted teeth were selected and shaped with Proglider, ProTaper Next X1-X2. Samples were randomly divided into four groups: warm filling with ZOE sealer; cold filling with resin-based sealer; cold filling with bioceramic sealer; warm filling with bioceramic sealer. After 7 days, a 10 mm post space was prepared using dedicated drills, and each group was divided into two subgroups according to the adhesive procedure (self-etch vs etch-and-rinse, SE vs ER) employed for fiber post cementation with dual resin cement. Samples were analyzed with push-out tests at T0 and T1. 16 additional non-carious multirooted teeth were prepared following the described groups and subgroups for in-situ zymography analysis at T0 and T1. A four-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey was used to test the four factors and one-way ANOVA to evaluate the differences within each variable (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bioceramic sealer showed significantly higher bond strength than traditional sealer (P 0.05), especially when associated with the warm filling technique. SE adhesive protocol performed significantly better (P 0.05) independently of the sealer used, the filling technique, and the aging time. Greater endogenous collagenolytic activity was identified within the hybrid layer of ER-treated samples compared to SE independently from the other variables tested. In addition, warm technique proved to significantly reduce MMPs activity compared to the cold technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results showed that bioceramic sealers should guarantee better results in radicular dentin bond strength, without altering the endogenous enzymatic activity. The heat produced during the root canal obturation might reduce the internal enzymatic activity but, in association with bioceramic sealers, after 12 months, it produces higher bond strength. Heat reduces the difference between the two adhesive systems. ER technique and aging increase enzymatic activity. Aging tends to increase bond strength, especially in traditional sealers groups associated with ER protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":94234,"journal":{"name":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","volume":"27 ","pages":"145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12215943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of adhesive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.c_2128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of radicular bond strength and dentinal matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) activity with different endodontic sealers (traditional vs bioceramic), filling techniques (warm vs cold), and adhesive protocols (self-etch vs etch-and-rinse), after 24 hours and after one year (T0 vs T1).
Materials and methods: 96 extracted, caries-free, single-rooted teeth were selected and shaped with Proglider, ProTaper Next X1-X2. Samples were randomly divided into four groups: warm filling with ZOE sealer; cold filling with resin-based sealer; cold filling with bioceramic sealer; warm filling with bioceramic sealer. After 7 days, a 10 mm post space was prepared using dedicated drills, and each group was divided into two subgroups according to the adhesive procedure (self-etch vs etch-and-rinse, SE vs ER) employed for fiber post cementation with dual resin cement. Samples were analyzed with push-out tests at T0 and T1. 16 additional non-carious multirooted teeth were prepared following the described groups and subgroups for in-situ zymography analysis at T0 and T1. A four-way ANOVA, post-hoc Tukey was used to test the four factors and one-way ANOVA to evaluate the differences within each variable (α = 0.05).
Results: Bioceramic sealer showed significantly higher bond strength than traditional sealer (P 0.05), especially when associated with the warm filling technique. SE adhesive protocol performed significantly better (P 0.05) independently of the sealer used, the filling technique, and the aging time. Greater endogenous collagenolytic activity was identified within the hybrid layer of ER-treated samples compared to SE independently from the other variables tested. In addition, warm technique proved to significantly reduce MMPs activity compared to the cold technique.
Conclusion: The results showed that bioceramic sealers should guarantee better results in radicular dentin bond strength, without altering the endogenous enzymatic activity. The heat produced during the root canal obturation might reduce the internal enzymatic activity but, in association with bioceramic sealers, after 12 months, it produces higher bond strength. Heat reduces the difference between the two adhesive systems. ER technique and aging increase enzymatic activity. Aging tends to increase bond strength, especially in traditional sealers groups associated with ER protocol.
目的:在24小时和1年后(T0 vs T1),评估不同牙髓密封剂(传统与生物陶瓷)、填充技术(温式与冷式)和粘合方案(自蚀刻与蚀刻-冲洗)的根性结合强度和牙本质基质金属蛋白酶(MMPs)活性。材料与方法:选择96颗拔牙无龋单根牙,用Proglider、ProTaper Next X1-X2进行塑形。将样品随机分为四组:ZOE封口胶温补;树脂基封口剂冷填充;生物陶瓷封口器冷填充;温热填充生物陶瓷密封剂。7天后,使用专用钻头准备10 mm的桩空间,每组根据双树脂水泥纤维桩胶结的粘合程序(自蚀刻vs蚀刻-冲洗,SE vs ER)分为两个亚组。在T0和T1时对样品进行推出试验。在T0和T1时,按照上述各组和亚组制备另外16颗无龋多根牙进行原位酶谱分析。采用四向方差分析和事后检验,采用单向方差分析评价各变量间的差异(α = 0.05)。结果:生物陶瓷封口剂的粘结强度明显高于传统封口剂(P < 0.05),特别是与热充填技术相结合时。SE胶粘剂方案与所使用的密封剂、填充技术和老化时间无关,其表现均显著较好(P < 0.05)。与其他测试变量相比,在er处理样品的杂交层中发现了更大的内源性胶原溶解活性。此外,与冷处理相比,热处理可显著降低MMPs活性。结论:生物陶瓷封口剂在不改变牙本质内源酶活性的情况下,可以保证牙本质根状结合强度的提高。根管封闭过程中产生的热量可能会降低内部酶活性,但与生物陶瓷密封剂结合,在12个月后,它会产生更高的结合强度。热量减少了两种粘合剂系统之间的差异。内质网技术和老化增加酶的活性。老化倾向于增加粘合强度,特别是在与ER协议相关的传统密封剂组。