Predictors of response in patients with traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain treated with the 8% capsaicin patch.

L Monteagudo Moreno, P Cía Blasco, M Malo Urries, A Nuez Polo, C Marín Zaldívar
{"title":"Predictors of response in patients with traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain treated with the 8% capsaicin patch.","authors":"L Monteagudo Moreno, P Cía Blasco, M Malo Urries, A Nuez Polo, C Marín Zaldívar","doi":"10.1016/j.redare.2025.501880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Neuropathic pain (NP) is a widespread, complex disorder that responds differently to pharmacological treatment. The aim of this study was to identify the baseline characteristics of good response to capsaicin 8% patch in patients with trauma-induced peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, longitudinal, open-label study in 31 patients with PNP treated with 1-3 applications of the capsaicin 8% patch for 52 weeks. Response to treatment was defined as a reduction in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score compared to baseline. Data from responders and non-responders were compared at the start (month 1) and end (month 12) of treatment. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At month 1, responders (n = 17) had significantly larger treatment areas (155.18 cm<sup>2</sup> vs. 59.21 cm<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.004) and reported greater pain relief with treatments received in the previous week in the brief pain questionnaire (34.7% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.023). At month 12, significant predictors included cold allodynia (OR 8; p = 0.030), positive for painful cold in the DN4 questionnaire (OR 7.936; p = 0.019), no penetrating pain (OR 16.800; p = 0.009), and pain interference with work score <7.5 (OR 7.917; p = 0.019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study makes a significant contribution to the management of post-traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain by providing tools to personalise treatment and optimize available resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":94196,"journal":{"name":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","volume":" ","pages":"501880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redare.2025.501880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Neuropathic pain (NP) is a widespread, complex disorder that responds differently to pharmacological treatment. The aim of this study was to identify the baseline characteristics of good response to capsaicin 8% patch in patients with trauma-induced peripheral neuropathic pain (PNP).

Materials and methods: We performed a prospective, longitudinal, open-label study in 31 patients with PNP treated with 1-3 applications of the capsaicin 8% patch for 52 weeks. Response to treatment was defined as a reduction in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score compared to baseline. Data from responders and non-responders were compared at the start (month 1) and end (month 12) of treatment. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of treatment response.

Results: At month 1, responders (n = 17) had significantly larger treatment areas (155.18 cm2 vs. 59.21 cm2; p = 0.004) and reported greater pain relief with treatments received in the previous week in the brief pain questionnaire (34.7% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.023). At month 12, significant predictors included cold allodynia (OR 8; p = 0.030), positive for painful cold in the DN4 questionnaire (OR 7.936; p = 0.019), no penetrating pain (OR 16.800; p = 0.009), and pain interference with work score <7.5 (OR 7.917; p = 0.019).

Conclusions: This study makes a significant contribution to the management of post-traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain by providing tools to personalise treatment and optimize available resources.

8%辣椒素贴片治疗外伤性周围神经性疼痛患者反应的预测因素。
背景和目的:神经性疼痛(NP)是一种广泛而复杂的疾病,对药物治疗的反应不同。本研究的目的是确定8%辣椒素贴片对创伤性周围神经性疼痛(PNP)患者良好反应的基线特征。材料和方法:我们对31例PNP患者进行了一项前瞻性、纵向、开放标签的研究,这些患者接受1-3次8%辣椒素贴剂治疗,持续52周。对治疗的反应被定义为视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分较基线的降低。在治疗开始(第1个月)和结束(第12个月)比较应答者和无应答者的数据。采用Logistic回归来确定治疗反应的预测因素。结果:在第1个月,有应答者(n = 17)的治疗面积显著增大(155.18 cm2 vs. 59.21 cm2;P = 0.004),并且在简短疼痛问卷中报告前一周接受治疗的患者疼痛缓解更大(34.7% vs. 14.3%;p = 0.023)。在第12个月,显著的预测因子包括冷性异常性痛(OR 8;p = 0.030), DN4问卷中疼痛性感冒阳性(OR 7.936;p = 0.019),无穿透性疼痛(OR 16.800;结论:本研究为创伤后周围神经性疼痛的治疗提供了个性化治疗和优化可用资源的工具,对创伤后周围神经性疼痛的治疗有重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信