Chun-Yip Hon, Jackie Ellis, Tina I En Chiang, Matty Jeronimo, Rita Ciconte, A Dana Ménard
{"title":"Adoption of Closed-System Drug Transfer Devices: Effectiveness in Reducing Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Drugs and the Change Management Process.","authors":"Chun-Yip Hon, Jackie Ellis, Tina I En Chiang, Matty Jeronimo, Rita Ciconte, A Dana Ménard","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Closed-system drug transfer devices (CSTDs) are known to be effective in reducing hazardous drug contamination and, in turn, the risk of exposure for health care workers. In response, the Fraser Health Authority in British Columbia had plans to introduce CSTDs into practice.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To confirm the effectiveness of CSTDs in reducing hazardous drug contamination and to understand health care workers' perspectives regarding the change management process for CSTD implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Surface wipe samples were collected at 4 health care facilities within the health authority over 3 time points: T<sub>0</sub>, 1 month before CSTDs were introduced; T<sub>1</sub>, 1 month after CSTDs were introduced; and T<sub>2</sub>, 5 months after implementation. Comparative analysis of drug contamination levels was conducted between 2 pairs of sampling times: T<sub>0</sub> vs T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>1</sub> vs T<sub>2</sub>. To understand the change management process, health care workers at the same departments (as those where wipe samples were collected) were surveyed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 wipe samples were collected, consisting of 13 samples at each of the 4 sites at each of the 3 time points. There was a statistically significant reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.01) in the sum of the mass of drug contaminants from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>1</sub> (25.82 vs 4.01 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>) and from T<sub>1</sub> to T<sub>2</sub> (4.01 vs 0.068 ng/cm<sup>2</sup>). About 50 individuals responded to each question of the survey, and respondents had generally positive comments regarding the transition to CSTDs. Nevertheless, suggestions for improvement included offering various forms of training (e.g., online video, hands-on sessions) and ensuring ongoing communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CSTDs were confirmed to be effective in reducing surface contamination levels, and the change management process employed by the health authority appeared to be well received.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 3","pages":"e3676"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204714/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Closed-system drug transfer devices (CSTDs) are known to be effective in reducing hazardous drug contamination and, in turn, the risk of exposure for health care workers. In response, the Fraser Health Authority in British Columbia had plans to introduce CSTDs into practice.
Objectives: To confirm the effectiveness of CSTDs in reducing hazardous drug contamination and to understand health care workers' perspectives regarding the change management process for CSTD implementation.
Methods: Surface wipe samples were collected at 4 health care facilities within the health authority over 3 time points: T0, 1 month before CSTDs were introduced; T1, 1 month after CSTDs were introduced; and T2, 5 months after implementation. Comparative analysis of drug contamination levels was conducted between 2 pairs of sampling times: T0 vs T1 and T1 vs T2. To understand the change management process, health care workers at the same departments (as those where wipe samples were collected) were surveyed.
Results: A total of 156 wipe samples were collected, consisting of 13 samples at each of the 4 sites at each of the 3 time points. There was a statistically significant reduction (p < 0.01) in the sum of the mass of drug contaminants from T0 to T1 (25.82 vs 4.01 ng/cm2) and from T1 to T2 (4.01 vs 0.068 ng/cm2). About 50 individuals responded to each question of the survey, and respondents had generally positive comments regarding the transition to CSTDs. Nevertheless, suggestions for improvement included offering various forms of training (e.g., online video, hands-on sessions) and ensuring ongoing communication.
Conclusions: CSTDs were confirmed to be effective in reducing surface contamination levels, and the change management process employed by the health authority appeared to be well received.
背景:众所周知,封闭系统药物输送装置(CSTDs)可有效减少危险药物污染,从而降低卫生保健工作者的暴露风险。作为回应,不列颠哥伦比亚省的弗雷泽卫生局计划将性病纳入实践。目的:确认CSTD在减少危险药物污染方面的有效性,并了解卫生保健工作者对CSTD实施变更管理过程的看法。方法:在卫生主管部门内的4个卫生保健机构收集3个时间点的表面擦拭样本:性病传入前10个月和1个月;T1,植入cstd后1个月;T2为实施后5个月。比较分析T0 vs T1和T1 vs T2两对采样时间对药品污染程度的影响。为了了解变更管理流程,对同一部门(即收集擦拭样本的部门)的卫生保健工作者进行了调查。结果:共采集擦拭标本156份,3个时间点4个地点各13份。T0至T1 (25.82 vs 4.01 ng/cm2)和T1至T2 (4.01 vs 0.068 ng/cm2)药物污染物质量总和降低有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。调查的每个问题都有大约50个人回答,受访者对性传播疾病的转变普遍持积极态度。然而,改进的建议包括提供各种形式的培训(例如,在线视频、实践会议)和确保持续的沟通。结论:经证实,cstd在降低表面污染水平方面是有效的,卫生当局采用的变革管理程序似乎得到了好评。