Using population risk prediction for healthcare planning: a qualitative study of healthcare planners' experiences and views.

Julie George, Angus I G Ramsay, Sonya Crowe, Andrew Hayward
{"title":"Using population risk prediction for healthcare planning: a qualitative study of healthcare planners' experiences and views.","authors":"Julie George, Angus I G Ramsay, Sonya Crowe, Andrew Hayward","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdaf070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although English National Health Service (NHS) policymakers are eager to mandate use of data analytics to inform healthcare planning and prevention, little is known about what happens in practice. This study investigated the ways in which planners within the local payer organizations use population risk prediction models to inform their planning of healthcare and enablers and barriers to use of such tools.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative case study design across five payer organizations. Interviews (n = 20) were conducted with senior decision-makers from various backgrounds. Analysis was guided by diffusion of innovation frameworks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Financially stable organizations with existing investment in health intelligence using linked data were more likely to report use of risk prediction in their planning practice. Obstacles to uptake identified were financial instability; workforce capacity to consider use of such intelligence; distraction by centrally mandated system changes; concerns about completeness, accuracy, and timeliness of data; and interest in other sources of insight to inform planning such as patient experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Those working in healthcare, public health, or health intelligence need to recognize that financial and organizational stability are as important as investment in staff capacity/skills and data systems to increase the use of risk prediction to support prevention in the NHS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaf070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although English National Health Service (NHS) policymakers are eager to mandate use of data analytics to inform healthcare planning and prevention, little is known about what happens in practice. This study investigated the ways in which planners within the local payer organizations use population risk prediction models to inform their planning of healthcare and enablers and barriers to use of such tools.

Methods: Qualitative case study design across five payer organizations. Interviews (n = 20) were conducted with senior decision-makers from various backgrounds. Analysis was guided by diffusion of innovation frameworks.

Results: Financially stable organizations with existing investment in health intelligence using linked data were more likely to report use of risk prediction in their planning practice. Obstacles to uptake identified were financial instability; workforce capacity to consider use of such intelligence; distraction by centrally mandated system changes; concerns about completeness, accuracy, and timeliness of data; and interest in other sources of insight to inform planning such as patient experience.

Conclusions: Those working in healthcare, public health, or health intelligence need to recognize that financial and organizational stability are as important as investment in staff capacity/skills and data systems to increase the use of risk prediction to support prevention in the NHS.

利用人口风险预测进行医疗保健计划:医疗保健计划人员经验和观点的定性研究。
背景:尽管英国国民健康服务(NHS)的政策制定者渴望授权使用数据分析来为医疗保健计划和预防提供信息,但人们对实际情况知之甚少。本研究调查了当地付款人组织内的规划人员使用人口风险预测模型的方式,以告知他们的医疗保健规划以及使用此类工具的促成因素和障碍。方法:对五个支付方组织进行定性案例研究。对不同背景的高级决策者进行了访谈(n = 20)。分析以创新框架的扩散为指导。结果:财务稳定且在使用关联数据的健康情报方面已有投资的组织更有可能报告在其计划实践中使用风险预测。确定的吸收障碍是金融不稳定;考虑使用这种智能的劳动力能力;中央授权的系统变化分散了注意力;关注数据的完整性、准确性和及时性;以及对其他洞察来源的兴趣,以告知计划,如患者体验。结论:在医疗保健、公共卫生或健康情报领域工作的人员需要认识到财务和组织稳定性与对员工能力/技能和数据系统的投资同样重要,以增加风险预测的使用,以支持NHS的预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信