Early Post-Operative Outcomes in Closure and Non-Closure of Peritoneum in Open Appendicectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2025-07-01
F F Kollol, M A Uddin, M M Hossain, K R Hoque, M A Shakil, A H M Sufiyan, N Biswas, N Islam, S M S Hasan, I Jahan, M Mashruh, M A Anon, M W Islam, T R Shanta, M A A Mamun, M A Baten, M A K Azad
{"title":"Early Post-Operative Outcomes in Closure and Non-Closure of Peritoneum in Open Appendicectomy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis.","authors":"F F Kollol, M A Uddin, M M Hossain, K R Hoque, M A Shakil, A H M Sufiyan, N Biswas, N Islam, S M S Hasan, I Jahan, M Mashruh, M A Anon, M W Islam, T R Shanta, M A A Mamun, M A Baten, M A K Azad","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open appendicectomy remains a common surgical procedure for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Traditionally, peritoneal closure has been performed to restore anatomical layers, but this practice has been questioned due to its potential impact on surgical duration, postoperative pain and recovery outcomes. This study aims to compare early postoperative outcomes between peritoneal closure and non-closure techniques in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. This prospective comparative study was conducted at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, from July 2021 to June 2022, including 80 patients undergoing open appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Patients were divided into Group I (peritoneal closure) and Group II (peritoneal non-closure).Data were processed and analyzed using the computer software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26.0 for Windows). The probability value, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI, or comorbidities between the groups. Most procedures used a Grid Iron incision (67.5%). Wound infection (22.5%, 17.5% respectively) and wound dehiscence (7.5%, 2.5% respectively) rates were almost similar, with no significant differences (p=0.576 and p=0.305, respectively). However, Group II had significantly lower postoperative wound pain (p<0.001), reduced analgesic requirements (p<0.001) and shorter surgery duration (p<0.001) compared to Group I, demonstrating the potential benefits of omitting peritoneal closure in appendicectomy. It is concluded that non-closure of the peritoneum at open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis appears to have no adverse effect on post-operative recovery and outcome. Leaving the peritoneum open seems to reduce the operating time and shorter hospital stays. It also decreases post-operative pain with less analgesic requirement. Hence, the practice of non-closure of peritoneum in open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis can be done safely.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"34 3","pages":"707-713"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open appendicectomy remains a common surgical procedure for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Traditionally, peritoneal closure has been performed to restore anatomical layers, but this practice has been questioned due to its potential impact on surgical duration, postoperative pain and recovery outcomes. This study aims to compare early postoperative outcomes between peritoneal closure and non-closure techniques in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. This prospective comparative study was conducted at Mymensingh Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh, from July 2021 to June 2022, including 80 patients undergoing open appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Patients were divided into Group I (peritoneal closure) and Group II (peritoneal non-closure).Data were processed and analyzed using the computer software SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26.0 for Windows). The probability value, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. There was no significant difference in age, sex, BMI, or comorbidities between the groups. Most procedures used a Grid Iron incision (67.5%). Wound infection (22.5%, 17.5% respectively) and wound dehiscence (7.5%, 2.5% respectively) rates were almost similar, with no significant differences (p=0.576 and p=0.305, respectively). However, Group II had significantly lower postoperative wound pain (p<0.001), reduced analgesic requirements (p<0.001) and shorter surgery duration (p<0.001) compared to Group I, demonstrating the potential benefits of omitting peritoneal closure in appendicectomy. It is concluded that non-closure of the peritoneum at open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis appears to have no adverse effect on post-operative recovery and outcome. Leaving the peritoneum open seems to reduce the operating time and shorter hospital stays. It also decreases post-operative pain with less analgesic requirement. Hence, the practice of non-closure of peritoneum in open appendicectomy for uncomplicated appendicitis can be done safely.

无并发症阑尾炎开放性阑尾切除术中闭合与不闭合腹膜的早期术后疗效。
开放式阑尾切除术仍然是治疗无并发症急性阑尾炎的常用手术方法。传统上,通过腹膜闭合来恢复解剖层,但由于其对手术时间、术后疼痛和恢复结果的潜在影响,这种做法受到质疑。本研究旨在比较腹膜闭合技术和非闭合技术在阑尾开腹切除术患者术后早期的预后。这项前瞻性比较研究于2021年7月至2022年6月在孟加拉国Mymensingh医学院医院进行,包括80例因无并发症急性阑尾炎接受开放式阑尾切除术的患者。患者分为ⅰ组(腹膜闭合)和ⅱ组(腹膜不闭合)。使用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 26.0 for Windows)计算机软件对数据进行处理和分析。概率值p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信