Early Outcome of Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure Compared to Open Method.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2025-07-01
G M Shawon, M A Rahman, M N Islam, T H Nayamoth, A S M Chowdhury, K Y Ishad, S Mohammed
{"title":"Early Outcome of Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure Compared to Open Method.","authors":"G M Shawon, M A Rahman, M N Islam, T H Nayamoth, A S M Chowdhury, K Y Ishad, S Mohammed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) has long been regarded as the standard treatment for chronic anal fissure (CAF). Both open and closed methods are practiced for LIS. In this study evaluated and compared the early clinical outcome in terms of patient morbidity and procedure related complications of both the methods. This was a quasi-experimental study conducted in the department of Surgery, Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh (SSMCMH), Dhaka, Bangladesh from May 2018 to April 2019. Fifty (50) patients of chronic anal fissure had been chosen purposively and divided into two groups. Experimental group had 25 patients who underwent closed LIS and Control group had 25 patients who underwent open LIS. All patients were followed up at 2 weeks' and 6 weeks' after surgery. Mean duration of operation in closed method was 8.40±2.10 minutes and in open method 13.48±1.76 minutes, which was significant (p<0.001). Post-operative pain at different time interval was lower in experimental group and significantly lower at 48th hour with a p-value of 0.002. Closed LIS is a safe and time worthy method with less patient morbidity and less post-operative complications for the treatment of CAF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":"34 3","pages":"840-845"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) has long been regarded as the standard treatment for chronic anal fissure (CAF). Both open and closed methods are practiced for LIS. In this study evaluated and compared the early clinical outcome in terms of patient morbidity and procedure related complications of both the methods. This was a quasi-experimental study conducted in the department of Surgery, Sir Salimullah Medical College Mitford Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh (SSMCMH), Dhaka, Bangladesh from May 2018 to April 2019. Fifty (50) patients of chronic anal fissure had been chosen purposively and divided into two groups. Experimental group had 25 patients who underwent closed LIS and Control group had 25 patients who underwent open LIS. All patients were followed up at 2 weeks' and 6 weeks' after surgery. Mean duration of operation in closed method was 8.40±2.10 minutes and in open method 13.48±1.76 minutes, which was significant (p<0.001). Post-operative pain at different time interval was lower in experimental group and significantly lower at 48th hour with a p-value of 0.002. Closed LIS is a safe and time worthy method with less patient morbidity and less post-operative complications for the treatment of CAF.

闭合性外侧内括约肌切开术治疗慢性肛裂的早期疗效比较。
外侧内括约肌切开术(LIS)一直被认为是治疗慢性肛裂(CAF)的标准方法。LIS采用了开放和封闭两种方法。在这项研究中,评估和比较了两种方法的患者发病率和手术相关并发症的早期临床结果。这是一项准实验研究,于2018年5月至2019年4月在孟加拉国达卡萨利马拉爵士医学院米特福德医院(SSMCMH)外科进行。选择慢性肛裂患者50例,分为两组。实验组25例行闭式LIS,对照组25例行开式LIS。所有患者分别于术后2周和6周随访。闭式法平均手术时间为8.40±2.10 min,开式法平均手术时间为13.48±1.76 min,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信