Visualisation of the Ampulla of Vater on Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.

IF 2
Eliezer Zahra, Rebecca Sammut, Reena Sidhu, Lucia Scaramella, Nicole Sciberras, Kelly Conti, Clelia Marmo, Giulia Scardino, Cristina Carretero, Emmanuele Rondonotti, Maria Elena Riccioni, Luca Elli, Nicoletta Nandi, Pierre Ellul, Stefania Chetcuti Zammit
{"title":"Visualisation of the Ampulla of Vater on Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy.","authors":"Eliezer Zahra, Rebecca Sammut, Reena Sidhu, Lucia Scaramella, Nicole Sciberras, Kelly Conti, Clelia Marmo, Giulia Scardino, Cristina Carretero, Emmanuele Rondonotti, Maria Elena Riccioni, Luca Elli, Nicoletta Nandi, Pierre Ellul, Stefania Chetcuti Zammit","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Visualization of lesions on small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) depends on capsule motility. The aim of this study was to assess the delineation of the ampulla of Vater (AoV) across different levels of expertise and reading speeds.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a study whereby de-identified SBCE videos were reviewed by scrolling with mouse wheel and then at a speed of 10 frames per second (10 fps). Data regarding delineation of the AoV and bile was collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients (63.3% males, 63.5 years +/- SD 7.164) were included. The mean detection rate of AoV was higher when the mouse wheel was used than when compared to 10 fps for trainees (35% vs. 21.7%) and experts (33.8% vs 20.5%). The rate of concordance in the delineation of the AoV amongst experts declined with higher reviewing speeds (κ 0.493, p=0.98 mouse wheel vs κ 0.482, p=0.2 10 fps). Experts had a better agreement in detecting AoV than trainees (κ 0.493, p=0.98 vs 0.482, p=0.2 for mouse wheel and 10 fps respectively for experts: κ 0.135, p=0.75 for mouse wheel and 0.109, p=0.2 at 10 fps).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that visualization of the AoV is dependent on the level of expertise and capsule speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"34 2","pages":"167-173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Visualization of lesions on small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) depends on capsule motility. The aim of this study was to assess the delineation of the ampulla of Vater (AoV) across different levels of expertise and reading speeds.

Methods: This was a study whereby de-identified SBCE videos were reviewed by scrolling with mouse wheel and then at a speed of 10 frames per second (10 fps). Data regarding delineation of the AoV and bile was collected.

Results: Thirty patients (63.3% males, 63.5 years +/- SD 7.164) were included. The mean detection rate of AoV was higher when the mouse wheel was used than when compared to 10 fps for trainees (35% vs. 21.7%) and experts (33.8% vs 20.5%). The rate of concordance in the delineation of the AoV amongst experts declined with higher reviewing speeds (κ 0.493, p=0.98 mouse wheel vs κ 0.482, p=0.2 10 fps). Experts had a better agreement in detecting AoV than trainees (κ 0.493, p=0.98 vs 0.482, p=0.2 for mouse wheel and 10 fps respectively for experts: κ 0.135, p=0.75 for mouse wheel and 0.109, p=0.2 at 10 fps).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that visualization of the AoV is dependent on the level of expertise and capsule speed.

小肠胶囊内镜下水壶腹的显像。
背景和目的:小肠胶囊内镜(SBCE)病变的可视化取决于胶囊的运动。本研究的目的是评估不同水平的专业知识和阅读速度对壶腹水(AoV)的描绘。方法:这是一项研究,通过用鼠标滚轮滚动,然后以每秒10帧(10 fps)的速度浏览去识别的SBCE视频。收集有关AoV和胆汁圈定的数据。结果:纳入30例患者(男性63.3%,63.5岁+/- SD 7.164)。使用鼠标滚轮的AoV平均检出率高于受训人员(35% vs. 21.7%)和专家(33.8% vs. 20.5%)。随着复习速度的提高,专家对AoV描述的一致性率下降(κ 0.493, p=0.98鼠标轮vs κ 0.482, p=0.2 10 fps)。专家在检测AoV时的一致性优于受训人员(κ 0.493, p=0.98 vs 0.482, p=0.2,分别为鼠标滚轮和10 fps时的κ 0.135, p=0.75和0.109,p=0.2)。结论:本研究表明,AoV的可视化取决于技术水平和胶囊速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信