Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Adding Neostigmine to Lidocaine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery.

IF 1.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-06-29 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.87010
Jasim M Salman, Huda M Hadi
{"title":"Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Adding Neostigmine to Lidocaine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery.","authors":"Jasim M Salman, Huda M Hadi","doi":"10.7759/cureus.87010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neostigmine, a reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI), has shown potential as an adjunct to local anesthetics like lidocaine in peripheral nerve blocks, including carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). It may prolong analgesia by activating muscarinic receptors involved in pain modulation. Some studies report that adding neostigmine to lidocaine improves the duration of anesthesia and postoperative pain relief, particularly in upper limb procedures. However, results are mixed, possibly due to differences in doses or nerve barrier permeability. Overall, neostigmine's role in enhancing analgesia in nerve blocks such as Bier's block and CTS remains an active area of investigation.</p><p><strong>Aim of study: </strong>This study aims to assess the analgesic efficacy of adding 0.5 mg neostigmine to 2% lidocaine in adult patients undergoing upper limb surgery under intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). Specifically, it evaluates the impact of this combination on intraoperative and postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and recovery profiles, thereby contributing to improved perioperative pain management strategies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 52 patients admitted to Al-Fayhaa Teaching Hospital, Basrah, Iraq, were randomized into two groups of 26 patients each. One patient excluded from analysis from each group. In the control group, local anesthesia of 3 mg/kg lidocaine was administered with 40 mL of normal saline. While the neostigmine group patients received 3 mg/kg lidocaine with 0.5 mg neostigmine, the same amount of saline was administered. Physiological parameters, sensation, and motor activity onset time, and recovery time after intravenous regional anesthesia were registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neostigmine group included males (4%) and females (96%) with a mean age of 41.76±5.69 years, while the control group included males (20%) and females (80%) with a mean age of 37.6±5.00 years. There were no differences in the demographic data (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), gender, weight), in addition to pinprick onset and recovery times, touch onset time, and block recovery time between both groups. A significant difference was observed in the age, surgical duration time, tourniquet time, touch recovery time, and motor block onset time between both groups (p < 0.05). In addition, no significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the two groups (p = 0.074). However, there was a significant association in analgesic need, whether intraoperative or to reduce tourniquet pain, among the compared groups (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The addition of neostigmine to lidocaine in the surgical treatment of CTS shows no significant benefits regarding postoperative pain relief, but it is of benefit during the operation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 6","pages":"e87010"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12208000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.87010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neostigmine, a reversible acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChEI), has shown potential as an adjunct to local anesthetics like lidocaine in peripheral nerve blocks, including carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). It may prolong analgesia by activating muscarinic receptors involved in pain modulation. Some studies report that adding neostigmine to lidocaine improves the duration of anesthesia and postoperative pain relief, particularly in upper limb procedures. However, results are mixed, possibly due to differences in doses or nerve barrier permeability. Overall, neostigmine's role in enhancing analgesia in nerve blocks such as Bier's block and CTS remains an active area of investigation.

Aim of study: This study aims to assess the analgesic efficacy of adding 0.5 mg neostigmine to 2% lidocaine in adult patients undergoing upper limb surgery under intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). Specifically, it evaluates the impact of this combination on intraoperative and postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and recovery profiles, thereby contributing to improved perioperative pain management strategies.

Patients and methods: A total of 52 patients admitted to Al-Fayhaa Teaching Hospital, Basrah, Iraq, were randomized into two groups of 26 patients each. One patient excluded from analysis from each group. In the control group, local anesthesia of 3 mg/kg lidocaine was administered with 40 mL of normal saline. While the neostigmine group patients received 3 mg/kg lidocaine with 0.5 mg neostigmine, the same amount of saline was administered. Physiological parameters, sensation, and motor activity onset time, and recovery time after intravenous regional anesthesia were registered.

Results: The neostigmine group included males (4%) and females (96%) with a mean age of 41.76±5.69 years, while the control group included males (20%) and females (80%) with a mean age of 37.6±5.00 years. There were no differences in the demographic data (American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), gender, weight), in addition to pinprick onset and recovery times, touch onset time, and block recovery time between both groups. A significant difference was observed in the age, surgical duration time, tourniquet time, touch recovery time, and motor block onset time between both groups (p < 0.05). In addition, no significant differences in postoperative complications were observed between the two groups (p = 0.074). However, there was a significant association in analgesic need, whether intraoperative or to reduce tourniquet pain, among the compared groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The addition of neostigmine to lidocaine in the surgical treatment of CTS shows no significant benefits regarding postoperative pain relief, but it is of benefit during the operation.

新斯的明加利多卡因静脉局部麻醉用于腕管综合征手术的镇痛效果评价。
背景:新斯的明是一种可逆的乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂(AChEI),在包括腕管综合征(CTS)在内的周围神经阻滞中,已显示出作为局部麻醉剂(如利多卡因)的辅助药物的潜力。它可能通过激活参与疼痛调节的毒蕈碱受体来延长镇痛。一些研究报道,在利多卡因中加入新斯的明可以改善麻醉持续时间和术后疼痛缓解,特别是在上肢手术中。然而,结果好坏参半,可能是由于剂量或神经屏障渗透性的差异。总的来说,新斯的明在神经阻滞(如比尔阻滞和CTS)中增强镇痛的作用仍然是一个活跃的研究领域。研究目的:本研究旨在评价2%利多卡因加用0.5 mg新斯的明对成人上肢手术静脉区域麻醉(IVRA)患者的镇痛效果。具体来说,它评估了这种组合对术中和术后疼痛、镇痛需求和恢复情况的影响,从而有助于改善围手术期疼痛管理策略。患者和方法:将伊拉克巴士拉Al-Fayhaa教学医院收治的52例患者随机分为两组,每组26例。每组排除1例患者。对照组局部麻醉利多卡因3 mg/kg,加生理盐水40 mL。新斯的明组患者给予利多卡因3 mg/kg +新斯的明0.5 mg,同时给予等量生理盐水。记录静脉区域麻醉后的生理参数、感觉、运动开始时间和恢复时间。结果:新斯的明组患者男性占4%,女性占96%,平均年龄为41.76±5.69岁;对照组患者男性占20%,女性占80%,平均年龄为37.6±5.00岁。两组在人口统计学数据(美国麻醉师协会(ASA)、性别、体重)、针刺发作和恢复时间、触碰发作时间、阻滞恢复时间等方面均无差异。两组患者年龄、手术时间、止血带时间、触觉恢复时间、运动阻滞发生时间差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异(p = 0.074)。然而,在对照组中,无论是术中镇痛还是减轻止血带疼痛,镇痛需求都有显著相关性(p < 0.001)。结论:利多卡因联合新斯的明在CTS手术治疗中对术后疼痛的缓解效果不明显,但在手术过程中是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信