Assessment of burden and needs of family caregivers for the elderly, a scoping review.

IF 3.3 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Frontiers in aging Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fragi.2025.1578911
Elodie Le Toullec, Anne Le Gagne, Emilie Leblong, Alain Somat, Patrice Piette
{"title":"Assessment of burden and needs of family caregivers for the elderly, a scoping review.","authors":"Elodie Le Toullec, Anne Le Gagne, Emilie Leblong, Alain Somat, Patrice Piette","doi":"10.3389/fragi.2025.1578911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family caregivers play a central role in supporting older adults. Their role is complex and challenging. Their assessment is essential for planning support systems. This review aims to catalog the different scales, identify the spectrum of dimensions they cover, and evaluate their psychometric quality, with the aim of reflecting on potential clinical recommendations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, google scholar and CINAHL databases identified tools for measuring family caregiver engagement. Two reviewers selected relevant studies using predefined criteria. Keywords included \"family caregivers,\" \"engagement,\" \"measurement,\" and \"psychometrics.\" Extracted data was analyzed for reliability, validity, and other psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 140 articles, 38 of which were analyzed, utilizing 29 different scales to assess caregiver support across various dimensions such as burden, stress, or needs. Clinimetric assessment using an abbreviated COSMIN checklist revealed significant variability in the reliability and validity of these scales, with only 2 meeting clinical research standards. Notable deficiencies were found in internal consistency, reproducibility, and construct validity. None of the scales cover the entire range of complex dimensions associated with family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the need for improved measurement tools tailored to the complexities of caregiver engagement. Future work should focus on developing more refined scales that better capture the diverse needs of family caregivers to enhance support.</p>","PeriodicalId":73061,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in aging","volume":"6 ","pages":"1578911"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2025.1578911","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Family caregivers play a central role in supporting older adults. Their role is complex and challenging. Their assessment is essential for planning support systems. This review aims to catalog the different scales, identify the spectrum of dimensions they cover, and evaluate their psychometric quality, with the aim of reflecting on potential clinical recommendations.

Method: A systematic review of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, google scholar and CINAHL databases identified tools for measuring family caregiver engagement. Two reviewers selected relevant studies using predefined criteria. Keywords included "family caregivers," "engagement," "measurement," and "psychometrics." Extracted data was analyzed for reliability, validity, and other psychometric properties.

Results: We identified 140 articles, 38 of which were analyzed, utilizing 29 different scales to assess caregiver support across various dimensions such as burden, stress, or needs. Clinimetric assessment using an abbreviated COSMIN checklist revealed significant variability in the reliability and validity of these scales, with only 2 meeting clinical research standards. Notable deficiencies were found in internal consistency, reproducibility, and construct validity. None of the scales cover the entire range of complex dimensions associated with family caregivers.

Conclusion: The study underscores the need for improved measurement tools tailored to the complexities of caregiver engagement. Future work should focus on developing more refined scales that better capture the diverse needs of family caregivers to enhance support.

评估老年人家庭照顾者的负担和需求,一项范围审查。
背景:家庭照顾者在支持老年人方面发挥着核心作用。他们的角色既复杂又具有挑战性。它们的评估对于规划支助系统至关重要。本综述旨在对不同的量表进行分类,确定其涵盖的维度范围,并评估其心理测量质量,以反映潜在的临床建议。方法:对MEDLINE、PsycINFO、谷歌scholar和CINAHL数据库进行系统回顾,确定了测量家庭照顾者参与的工具。两位审稿人使用预定义的标准选择相关研究。关键词包括“家庭照顾者”、“参与”、“测量”和“心理测量学”。对提取的数据进行信度、效度和其他心理测量特性分析。结果:我们确定了140篇文章,其中38篇进行了分析,使用29种不同的量表来评估护理人员在负担、压力或需求等各个方面的支持。使用简略的COSMIN检查表进行临床计量评估,发现这些量表的信度和效度存在显著差异,只有2个符合临床研究标准。在内部一致性、可重复性和结构效度方面发现了显著的缺陷。没有一个量表涵盖与家庭照顾者相关的所有复杂维度。结论:该研究强调需要改进测量工具,以适应护理人员参与的复杂性。未来的工作应侧重于开发更精细的量表,以更好地捕捉家庭照顾者的不同需求,以加强支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信