What Is the Impact of Second Language Exposure and Intellectual Disability Status on Executive Function and Functional Communication Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)?

IF 5.6
Sarah M Hutchison, Natalia DiazPinzon, Tim F Oberlander, Grace Iarocci
{"title":"What Is the Impact of Second Language Exposure and Intellectual Disability Status on Executive Function and Functional Communication Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)?","authors":"Sarah M Hutchison, Natalia DiazPinzon, Tim F Oberlander, Grace Iarocci","doi":"10.1002/aur.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past 10 years, research has suggested no negative effect on second language exposure in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet, parents and professionals may be concerned that using a second language with a child with ASD may negatively impact their communication and cognitive skills, especially if the child also has an intellectual disability. In this study, 396 children and adolesents (5-16 years) with and without ASD and with and without second language exposure participated in the study. Parents reported on language exposure and rated executive function (EF) and functional communication (FC) skills using a standardized questionnaire. IQ was directly measured using the WASI-II and children were classified as having an intellectual disability if they had a full-scale score of less than 70. The sample included 18 children with ASD and an intellectual disability (10 without second language exposure, 8 with second language exposure). Results showed that children with ASD and second language exposure had significantly better EF skills and were significantly less likely to have executive dysfunction in the clinical range than children with ASD with no second language exposure. Second language exposure also did not have a negative impact on EF skills in children with ASD even when an intellectual disability was present. For FC skills, we failed to find significant difference between children with ASD with and without second language exposure. For children with ASD and intellectual disability, there was no significant difference on FC skills between children with and without second language exposure. As our sample of children with ASD and intellectual disability was small, additional research with a larger sample is urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72339,"journal":{"name":"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.70070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past 10 years, research has suggested no negative effect on second language exposure in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), yet, parents and professionals may be concerned that using a second language with a child with ASD may negatively impact their communication and cognitive skills, especially if the child also has an intellectual disability. In this study, 396 children and adolesents (5-16 years) with and without ASD and with and without second language exposure participated in the study. Parents reported on language exposure and rated executive function (EF) and functional communication (FC) skills using a standardized questionnaire. IQ was directly measured using the WASI-II and children were classified as having an intellectual disability if they had a full-scale score of less than 70. The sample included 18 children with ASD and an intellectual disability (10 without second language exposure, 8 with second language exposure). Results showed that children with ASD and second language exposure had significantly better EF skills and were significantly less likely to have executive dysfunction in the clinical range than children with ASD with no second language exposure. Second language exposure also did not have a negative impact on EF skills in children with ASD even when an intellectual disability was present. For FC skills, we failed to find significant difference between children with ASD with and without second language exposure. For children with ASD and intellectual disability, there was no significant difference on FC skills between children with and without second language exposure. As our sample of children with ASD and intellectual disability was small, additional research with a larger sample is urgently needed.

第二语言接触和智力残疾状况对有或无自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童和青少年的执行功能和功能性沟通结果有何影响?
在过去的10年里,研究表明自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童的第二语言接触没有负面影响,然而,父母和专业人士可能担心,对自闭症谱系障碍儿童使用第二语言可能会对他们的沟通和认知能力产生负面影响,特别是如果孩子还患有智力障碍。在这项研究中,396名儿童和青少年(5-16岁)参加了研究,有和没有ASD,有和没有第二语言接触。家长使用标准化问卷报告语言暴露和评价执行功能(EF)和功能性沟通(FC)技能。使用WASI-II直接测量智商,如果儿童的全面得分低于70分,则被归类为智力残疾。样本包括18名患有自闭症和智力障碍的儿童(10名没有第二语言接触,8名有第二语言接触)。结果表明,与没有第二语言接触的自闭症儿童相比,有第二语言接触的自闭症儿童的EF技能明显更好,在临床范围内出现执行功能障碍的可能性也显著降低。第二语言接触对自闭症儿童的EF技能也没有负面影响,即使他们存在智力障碍。对于FC技能,我们没有发现有第二语言接触和没有第二语言接触的ASD儿童之间有显著差异。对于有ASD和智力残疾的儿童,有和没有接触第二语言的儿童在FC技能上没有显著差异。由于我们的自闭症和智力障碍儿童样本很小,因此迫切需要更多样本的额外研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信