Efficacy of early rituximab treatment in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Journal of Rheumatic Diseases Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-24 DOI:10.4078/jrd.2024.0149
Mohammad Shahdadian, Mohammad Ali Saghiri, Eugenio Capitle
{"title":"Efficacy of early rituximab treatment in primary Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohammad Shahdadian, Mohammad Ali Saghiri, Eugenio Capitle","doi":"10.4078/jrd.2024.0149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess Rituximab (RTX)'s efficacy and safety in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), particularly how treatment timing influences outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating RTX in pSS patients, focusing on disease activity (European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI] score) and adverse events (AEs). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Meta-analysis was performed in Stata 17 with a random-effects model, reporting mean differences in ESSDAI and I² for heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 555 articles, 15 studies were included (4 RCTs and 11 quasi-experimental studies). RCT meta-analysis showed a mean difference of 0.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43, 0.61), indicating no significant RTX efficacy. In contrast, the pooled quasi-experimental analysis revealed a mean difference of -4.36 (95% CI -5.83, -2.89), suggesting a significant reduction in disease activity. Meta-regression indicated no significant correlation between RTX efficacy and mean disease duration. Subgroup analysis of disease duration (under vs. over 60 months) showed no significant difference. Safety assessment indicated no significant differences in AEs between RTX and placebo in RCTs. In quasi-experimental studies, infusion reactions and infections were the most common AEs, with serious infections being the most severe.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RTX did not show significant improvement in RCTs. However, RTX significantly reduced pSS activity at week 24 or month 6 following treatment, based on quasi-experimental studies. We found no significant correlation between RTX efficacy and disease duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":56161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"32 3","pages":"211-224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12202284/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4078/jrd.2024.0149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess Rituximab (RTX)'s efficacy and safety in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS), particularly how treatment timing influences outcomes.

Methods: The study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental studies evaluating RTX in pSS patients, focusing on disease activity (European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index [ESSDAI] score) and adverse events (AEs). Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases up to July 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Meta-analysis was performed in Stata 17 with a random-effects model, reporting mean differences in ESSDAI and I² for heterogeneity.

Results: From 555 articles, 15 studies were included (4 RCTs and 11 quasi-experimental studies). RCT meta-analysis showed a mean difference of 0.09 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.43, 0.61), indicating no significant RTX efficacy. In contrast, the pooled quasi-experimental analysis revealed a mean difference of -4.36 (95% CI -5.83, -2.89), suggesting a significant reduction in disease activity. Meta-regression indicated no significant correlation between RTX efficacy and mean disease duration. Subgroup analysis of disease duration (under vs. over 60 months) showed no significant difference. Safety assessment indicated no significant differences in AEs between RTX and placebo in RCTs. In quasi-experimental studies, infusion reactions and infections were the most common AEs, with serious infections being the most severe.

Conclusion: RTX did not show significant improvement in RCTs. However, RTX significantly reduced pSS activity at week 24 or month 6 following treatment, based on quasi-experimental studies. We found no significant correlation between RTX efficacy and disease duration.

早期利妥昔单抗治疗原发性Sjögren综合征的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估利妥昔单抗(RTX)治疗原发性Sjögren综合征(pSS)的有效性和安全性,特别是治疗时机如何影响结果。方法:本研究包括随机对照试验(RCTs)和准实验研究,评估RTX在pSS患者中的作用,重点关注疾病活动性(欧洲抗风湿病联盟Sjögren's Syndrome disease activity Index [ESSDAI]评分)和不良事件(ae)。检索在MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行,截止到2024年7月。采用Cochrane Risk of bias 2.0 (RoB 2)和Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)检查表评估偏倚风险。meta分析在Stata 17中进行,采用随机效应模型,报告了ESSDAI的平均差异,I²表示异质性。结果:从555篇文献中纳入15项研究(4项随机对照试验和11项准实验研究)。RCT荟萃分析显示,平均差异为0.09(95%可信区间[CI] -0.43, 0.61),表明RTX无显著疗效。相比之下,合并准实验分析显示,平均差异为-4.36 (95% CI -5.83, -2.89),表明疾病活动性显著降低。meta回归显示RTX疗效与平均病程无显著相关性。亚组分析显示疾病持续时间(低于60个月和超过60个月)无显著差异。安全性评估显示RTX和安慰剂在随机对照试验中的ae无显著差异。在准实验研究中,输液反应和感染是最常见的ae,其中严重感染最为严重。结论:RTX在随机对照试验中无明显改善作用。然而,基于准实验研究,RTX在治疗后第24周或第6个月显著降低pSS活性。我们发现RTX疗效与病程无显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信