The Use of Mismatch Negativity in Conjunction with Neuropsychological Tests to Discriminate Alzheimer's Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Aging.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2025-06-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.29399/npa.28775
Duygu Özbayrak-Karapınar, Özden Arısoy, Nebil Yıldız
{"title":"The Use of Mismatch Negativity in Conjunction with Neuropsychological Tests to Discriminate Alzheimer's Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment and Healthy Aging.","authors":"Duygu Özbayrak-Karapınar, Özden Arısoy, Nebil Yıldız","doi":"10.29399/npa.28775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is the most common type of dementia and it is important to detect AD by an appropriately cheap and non-invasive method in the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) phase, which is accepted as the prodromal phase of AD. We aimed to investigate whether AD patients, amnestic MCI (aMCI) patients, and healthy controls (HCs) could be distinguished from each other by using mismatch negativity (MMN) together with neuropsychological tests.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one individuals with mild AD, 26 with aMCI, and 18 HCs matched for age, sex, and education were included. Sociodemographic data, neuropsychological tests, Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scores, and MMN parameters acquired using an auditory oddball paradigm with an interstimulus interval of 1 second were evaluated for all three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in terms of MMN latencies but frontal MMN amplitude was significantly lower in AD patients compared to the aMCI and HC groups. Linear regression analysis revealed that IADL scores were predicted by the Fz amplitude and Mini Mental State Examination and apathy scores. Logistic regression analysis showed that Fz amplitude, verbal fluency, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory total scores distinguished AD patients from HCs, while the Stroop 5 completion time distinguished those with MCI from HCs. Age, Fz amplitude, and verbal fluency performance distinguished AD patients from individuals with MCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MMN might be a useful approach in differentiating AD from MCI and healthy aging when used together with neuropsychological tests rather than being used alone because it may be affected by confounding factors such as age, severity of temporoparietal neurodegeneration, and duration of the interstimulus interval.</p>","PeriodicalId":51142,"journal":{"name":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","volume":"62 2","pages":"109-118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.28775","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is the most common type of dementia and it is important to detect AD by an appropriately cheap and non-invasive method in the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) phase, which is accepted as the prodromal phase of AD. We aimed to investigate whether AD patients, amnestic MCI (aMCI) patients, and healthy controls (HCs) could be distinguished from each other by using mismatch negativity (MMN) together with neuropsychological tests.

Methods: Twenty-one individuals with mild AD, 26 with aMCI, and 18 HCs matched for age, sex, and education were included. Sociodemographic data, neuropsychological tests, Basic Activities of Daily Living (BADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scores, and MMN parameters acquired using an auditory oddball paradigm with an interstimulus interval of 1 second were evaluated for all three groups.

Results: There was no difference in terms of MMN latencies but frontal MMN amplitude was significantly lower in AD patients compared to the aMCI and HC groups. Linear regression analysis revealed that IADL scores were predicted by the Fz amplitude and Mini Mental State Examination and apathy scores. Logistic regression analysis showed that Fz amplitude, verbal fluency, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory total scores distinguished AD patients from HCs, while the Stroop 5 completion time distinguished those with MCI from HCs. Age, Fz amplitude, and verbal fluency performance distinguished AD patients from individuals with MCI.

Conclusion: MMN might be a useful approach in differentiating AD from MCI and healthy aging when used together with neuropsychological tests rather than being used alone because it may be affected by confounding factors such as age, severity of temporoparietal neurodegeneration, and duration of the interstimulus interval.

使用错配否定结合神经心理测试来区分阿尔茨海默氏痴呆症,轻度认知障碍和健康老龄化。
阿尔茨海默氏痴呆(Alzheimer's dementia, AD)是一种最常见的痴呆类型,在轻度认知障碍(mild cognitive impairment, MCI)阶段采用一种适当廉价且无创的方法检测AD非常重要,轻度认知障碍被认为是AD的前驱期。我们的目的是通过错配阴性(MMN)和神经心理测试来研究AD患者、遗忘性MCI (aMCI)患者和健康对照(hc)是否可以相互区分。方法:纳入21例轻度AD患者,26例aMCI患者和18例年龄、性别和教育程度相匹配的hc患者。对三组的社会人口学数据、神经心理学测试、日常生活基本活动(BADL)和日常生活工具性活动(IADL)评分以及使用听觉古怪范式(刺激间隔为1秒)获得的MMN参数进行评估。结果:与aMCI组和HC组相比,AD患者的MMN潜伏期没有差异,但额部MMN振幅显著降低。线性回归分析显示,Fz振幅、迷你精神状态检查和冷漠评分可以预测IADL评分。Logistic回归分析显示,Fz振幅、语言流畅性和神经精神量表总分区分AD患者和hc患者,而Stroop 5完成时间区分MCI患者和hc患者。年龄、Fz振幅和语言流畅性表现将AD患者与MCI患者区分开来。结论:MMN可能受年龄、颞顶神经退行性变严重程度、刺激间期持续时间等混杂因素的影响,因此与神经心理测试联合使用可能是区分AD与MCI和健康衰老的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Neuropsychiatry (Arch Neuropsychiatry) is the official journal of the Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society. It is published quarterly, and four editions annually constitute a volume. Archives of Neuropsychiatry is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles on psychiatry, neurology, and behavioural sciences. Both clinical and basic science contributions are welcomed. Submissions that address topics in the interface of neurology and psychiatry are encouraged. The content covers original research articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信