Comparison of Naltrexone Implant and Oral Buprenorphine Naloxone in The Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.29399/npa.28738
Oğuz Peker, İrem Peker, Ali Çayköylü
{"title":"Comparison of Naltrexone Implant and Oral Buprenorphine Naloxone in The Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Oğuz Peker, İrem Peker, Ali Çayköylü","doi":"10.29399/npa.28738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study is to compare the duration of abstinence and relapse risk of patients using oral buprenorphine-naloxone (BN-NX) and naltrexone implants (XR-NTX) in the maintenance treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), and to examine the relationship between relapse risk and some sociodemographic and clinical features.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of 284 patients treated for OUD between 2021 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated in terms of relapse risk and abstinence duration with BUP-NX (107 patients) or XR-NTX (177 patients) as maintenance therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-treatment abstinence duration was significantly lower in the BN-NX group than in the XR-NTX group. (p=0.01). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (BN-NX: 5.6 months, XR-NTX: 6.6 months) in terms of relapse times within 1 year (p=0.026). According to Cox regression analysis, it was concluded that the increase in the age of onset of drug use, the increase in the longest period of abstinence and the use of XR-NTX treatment reduced the risk of relapse, while the increase in the number of inpatient treatments, probation and multiple substance use increased the risk of relapse.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of our study show that XR-NTX may be more effective than BN-NX in preventing relapse in OUD. In addition, it was concluded that probation, age of onset of substance use, multiple substance use, number of inpatient treatments and longest period of abstinence were predictive factors in terms of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":51142,"journal":{"name":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","volume":"62 2","pages":"125-130"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12205390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.28738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study is to compare the duration of abstinence and relapse risk of patients using oral buprenorphine-naloxone (BN-NX) and naltrexone implants (XR-NTX) in the maintenance treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), and to examine the relationship between relapse risk and some sociodemographic and clinical features.

Methods: Medical records, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of 284 patients treated for OUD between 2021 and 2023 were retrospectively evaluated in terms of relapse risk and abstinence duration with BUP-NX (107 patients) or XR-NTX (177 patients) as maintenance therapy.

Results: Post-treatment abstinence duration was significantly lower in the BN-NX group than in the XR-NTX group. (p=0.01). There was a statistically significant difference between the groups (BN-NX: 5.6 months, XR-NTX: 6.6 months) in terms of relapse times within 1 year (p=0.026). According to Cox regression analysis, it was concluded that the increase in the age of onset of drug use, the increase in the longest period of abstinence and the use of XR-NTX treatment reduced the risk of relapse, while the increase in the number of inpatient treatments, probation and multiple substance use increased the risk of relapse.

Conclusion: The findings of our study show that XR-NTX may be more effective than BN-NX in preventing relapse in OUD. In addition, it was concluded that probation, age of onset of substance use, multiple substance use, number of inpatient treatments and longest period of abstinence were predictive factors in terms of relapse.

纳曲酮植入与口服丁丙诺啡纳洛酮治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
前言:本研究的目的是比较口服丁丙诺啡-纳洛酮(BN-NX)和纳曲酮植入物(XR-NTX)维持治疗阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的戒断时间和复发风险,并探讨复发风险与一些社会人口学和临床特征之间的关系。方法:回顾性评估2021年至2023年间284例OUD患者的病历、社会人口统计学和临床特征,以BUP-NX(107例)或XR-NTX(177例)作为维持治疗,评估复发风险和戒断时间。结果:BN-NX组治疗后戒断时间明显低于XR-NTX组。(p = 0.01)。两组1年内复发次数(BN-NX: 5.6个月,XR-NTX: 6.6个月)比较,差异有统计学意义(p=0.026)。Cox回归分析认为,发病年龄的增加、最长戒断时间的增加和XR-NTX治疗的使用降低了复发风险,而住院治疗次数、缓刑次数和多重药物使用次数的增加增加了复发风险。结论:我们的研究结果表明XR-NTX在预防OUD复发方面可能比BN-NX更有效。此外,观察期、开始使用药物的年龄、多次使用药物、住院治疗次数和最长的戒断时间是复发的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Neuropsychiatry (Arch Neuropsychiatry) is the official journal of the Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society. It is published quarterly, and four editions annually constitute a volume. Archives of Neuropsychiatry is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles on psychiatry, neurology, and behavioural sciences. Both clinical and basic science contributions are welcomed. Submissions that address topics in the interface of neurology and psychiatry are encouraged. The content covers original research articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信