School-Based Health Centers and the Utilization of Primary Care in Rural Communities

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xue Zhang PhD , Sharon Tennyson PhD , Chris L. Kjolhede MD, MPH , Wendy M. Brunner PhD
{"title":"School-Based Health Centers and the Utilization of Primary Care in Rural Communities","authors":"Xue Zhang PhD ,&nbsp;Sharon Tennyson PhD ,&nbsp;Chris L. Kjolhede MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Wendy M. Brunner PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>School-based health centers (SBHCs) in rural communities improve students’ access to primary care, but evidence on service utilization patterns is limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2011–2017 electronic health record data for students (aged 5–18 years) who used primary care were analyzed to compare utilization patterns (total number of office visits, well-child, immunization, chronic-condition visits) in a 4-county rural region of New York. Students were categorized into no-SBHC-access (living in school districts without SBHCs) and SBHC-access (living in districts with SBHCs). Students with SBHC-access were further categorized into SBHC-non-users (with SBHCs access but not using SBHCs), SBHC-only-users (only using SBHCs), and hybrid users (using SBHCs and other primary care providers). Treatment effects of SBHC-access and usage categories were estimated, adjusting for age, sex (defined in health record), year, community-level socioeconomic factors, and student/school district random effects. Hybrid-users' visits were stratified by site (SBHCs versus non-SBHCs clinic). Analyses were performed in 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Students with SBHC access included 24% SBHC-non-users, 52% SBHC-only-users , and 24% hybrid users. SBHC-access category was associated with greater primary care utilization than no-SBHC-access category. Results differed within SBHC-access: hybrid users had the highest utilization, whereas SBHC-non-users had the lowest. SBHC-only-users had more office visits and were more likely to have immunizations than students without SBHCs access. Hybrid users had more office visits and immunizations at SBHCs than at other primary care clinics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SBHCs increased overall office visits and immunizations among students using primary care in this rural region. Promoting SBHCs enrollment and use is important because effects were seen only among students who utilized the SBHCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"69 4","pages":"Article 107962"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379725004532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

School-based health centers (SBHCs) in rural communities improve students’ access to primary care, but evidence on service utilization patterns is limited.

Methods

The 2011–2017 electronic health record data for students (aged 5–18 years) who used primary care were analyzed to compare utilization patterns (total number of office visits, well-child, immunization, chronic-condition visits) in a 4-county rural region of New York. Students were categorized into no-SBHC-access (living in school districts without SBHCs) and SBHC-access (living in districts with SBHCs). Students with SBHC-access were further categorized into SBHC-non-users (with SBHCs access but not using SBHCs), SBHC-only-users (only using SBHCs), and hybrid users (using SBHCs and other primary care providers). Treatment effects of SBHC-access and usage categories were estimated, adjusting for age, sex (defined in health record), year, community-level socioeconomic factors, and student/school district random effects. Hybrid-users' visits were stratified by site (SBHCs versus non-SBHCs clinic). Analyses were performed in 2025.

Results

Students with SBHC access included 24% SBHC-non-users, 52% SBHC-only-users , and 24% hybrid users. SBHC-access category was associated with greater primary care utilization than no-SBHC-access category. Results differed within SBHC-access: hybrid users had the highest utilization, whereas SBHC-non-users had the lowest. SBHC-only-users had more office visits and were more likely to have immunizations than students without SBHCs access. Hybrid users had more office visits and immunizations at SBHCs than at other primary care clinics.

Conclusions

SBHCs increased overall office visits and immunizations among students using primary care in this rural region. Promoting SBHCs enrollment and use is important because effects were seen only among students who utilized the SBHCs.
以学校为基础的保健中心和农村社区初级保健的利用。
农村社区校本保健中心(shbhcs)改善了学生获得初级保健的机会,但关于服务利用模式的证据有限。方法:分析2011-2017年使用初级保健的学生(5-18岁)的医疗保健遭遇数据,比较纽约四个县农村地区的利用模式(办公室就诊总次数、健康儿童、免疫接种、慢性病就诊)。学生被分为两组,一组是生活在没有儿童健康中心的学区,另一组是生活在有儿童健康中心的学区。可使用shbhc的学生进一步分为非shbhc使用者(可使用shbhc但未使用shbhc)、仅使用shbhc使用者(仅使用shbhc)和混合使用者(使用shbhc和其他初级保健提供者)。在调整了年龄、性别、年份、社区社会经济因素和学生/学区随机效应后,估计了shbhc获取和使用类别的治疗效果。混合用户的访问按地点分层(shbhc与非shbhc诊所)。分析在2025年进行。结果:使用shbhc的学生中,不使用shbhc的占24%,仅使用shbhc的占52%,混合使用shbhc的占24%。与没有获得shbhc的类别相比,获得shbhc与更高的初级保健利用相关。结果在shbhc访问中有所不同:混合用户的利用率最高,而非shbhc用户的利用率最低。与没有获得shbhc的学生相比,仅使用shbhc的学生有更多的办公室访问和更有可能进行免疫接种访问。与其他初级保健诊所相比,混合使用者在shbhc就诊和接种疫苗的次数更多。结论:在该农村地区,shbhcs增加了使用初级保健的学生的总体办公室访问量和免疫访问量。促进shbhc的注册和使用是重要的,因为只有在使用shbhc的学生中才能看到效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信