Xue Zhang PhD , Sharon Tennyson PhD , Chris L. Kjolhede MD, MPH , Wendy M. Brunner PhD
{"title":"School-Based Health Centers and the Utilization of Primary Care in Rural Communities","authors":"Xue Zhang PhD , Sharon Tennyson PhD , Chris L. Kjolhede MD, MPH , Wendy M. Brunner PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>School-based health centers (SBHCs) in rural communities improve students’ access to primary care, but evidence on service utilization patterns is limited.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The 2011–2017 electronic health record data for students (aged 5–18 years) who used primary care were analyzed to compare utilization patterns (total number of office visits, well-child, immunization, chronic-condition visits) in a 4-county rural region of New York. Students were categorized into no-SBHC-access (living in school districts without SBHCs) and SBHC-access (living in districts with SBHCs). Students with SBHC-access were further categorized into SBHC-non-users (with SBHCs access but not using SBHCs), SBHC-only-users (only using SBHCs), and hybrid users (using SBHCs and other primary care providers). Treatment effects of SBHC-access and usage categories were estimated, adjusting for age, sex (defined in health record), year, community-level socioeconomic factors, and student/school district random effects. Hybrid-users' visits were stratified by site (SBHCs versus non-SBHCs clinic). Analyses were performed in 2025.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Students with SBHC access included 24% SBHC-non-users, 52% SBHC-only-users , and 24% hybrid users. SBHC-access category was associated with greater primary care utilization than no-SBHC-access category. Results differed within SBHC-access: hybrid users had the highest utilization, whereas SBHC-non-users had the lowest. SBHC-only-users had more office visits and were more likely to have immunizations than students without SBHCs access. Hybrid users had more office visits and immunizations at SBHCs than at other primary care clinics.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SBHCs increased overall office visits and immunizations among students using primary care in this rural region. Promoting SBHCs enrollment and use is important because effects were seen only among students who utilized the SBHCs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"69 4","pages":"Article 107962"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379725004532","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
School-based health centers (SBHCs) in rural communities improve students’ access to primary care, but evidence on service utilization patterns is limited.
Methods
The 2011–2017 electronic health record data for students (aged 5–18 years) who used primary care were analyzed to compare utilization patterns (total number of office visits, well-child, immunization, chronic-condition visits) in a 4-county rural region of New York. Students were categorized into no-SBHC-access (living in school districts without SBHCs) and SBHC-access (living in districts with SBHCs). Students with SBHC-access were further categorized into SBHC-non-users (with SBHCs access but not using SBHCs), SBHC-only-users (only using SBHCs), and hybrid users (using SBHCs and other primary care providers). Treatment effects of SBHC-access and usage categories were estimated, adjusting for age, sex (defined in health record), year, community-level socioeconomic factors, and student/school district random effects. Hybrid-users' visits were stratified by site (SBHCs versus non-SBHCs clinic). Analyses were performed in 2025.
Results
Students with SBHC access included 24% SBHC-non-users, 52% SBHC-only-users , and 24% hybrid users. SBHC-access category was associated with greater primary care utilization than no-SBHC-access category. Results differed within SBHC-access: hybrid users had the highest utilization, whereas SBHC-non-users had the lowest. SBHC-only-users had more office visits and were more likely to have immunizations than students without SBHCs access. Hybrid users had more office visits and immunizations at SBHCs than at other primary care clinics.
Conclusions
SBHCs increased overall office visits and immunizations among students using primary care in this rural region. Promoting SBHCs enrollment and use is important because effects were seen only among students who utilized the SBHCs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.