Comparison of anti-desmoglein antibodies titres and anti-M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antibody titres as biomarker for potential pemphigus between subjects who are occupationally exposed and not exposed to pesticides.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dipankar De, Divya Kamat, Maninder Kaur, Dev Kumari, Arnab Pal, Sanjeev Handa, Siby John, Ravindra Khaiwal
{"title":"Comparison of anti-desmoglein antibodies titres and anti-M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antibody titres as biomarker for potential pemphigus between subjects who are occupationally exposed and not exposed to pesticides.","authors":"Dipankar De, Divya Kamat, Maninder Kaur, Dev Kumari, Arnab Pal, Sanjeev Handa, Siby John, Ravindra Khaiwal","doi":"10.25259/IJDVL_256_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The pathogenesis of pemphigus is multifactorial, and pesticides have been implicated as one of the triggering factors due to their interaction with acetylcholine receptors. Aim The aim of this study was to observe the effect of exposure to pesticides (by blood pesticide levels) on serological markers of pemphigus (anti-Dsg1, anti-Dsg3, and anti-M3 ACh receptor antibodies) amongst healthy individuals involved in pesticide use. Methods This was an observational, cross-sectional pilot study performed in Punjab. The study subjects were 45 couples (husband and wife) wherein the husband was involved in activities like spraying and handling pesticides, and the wife was considered a non-genetically related control (not occupationally exposed to pesticides). Clinical data were collected by a structured questionnaire, and venous blood was collected to test blood pesticide levels. Gas chromatography - mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used for anti-Dsg-1, anti-Dsg-3, and anti-M3Ach receptor antibody level detection. Results Pesticides were detected in both husband and wife. There was no correlation between the duration of pesticide exposure and their blood levels. Chlorpyrifos was most frequently detected in husbands and β- endosulfan in wives. The levels of anti-Dsg-1 and anti-Dsg-3 titres were below the diagnostic cut-off values (20 RU/mL) for pemphigus in all participants. Husbands had significantly higher anti-Dsg3 values (p=0.029). There was no statistically significant association between the presence of pesticides and anti-Dsg-1, anti-Dsg-3, and anti-M3 ACh receptor antibodies in the sera. Anti-Dsg-1 antibodies had a significant positive correlation with chlorpyrifos serum levels (r= 0.3, p=0.005). Limitation Determining aspects like expression of adhesion proteins on keratinocyte cell lines, long term follow up of healthy subjects and correlation with pesticide levels with cases of pemphigus was not done as it is cost intensive. Conclusion The exposure to pesticides did not significantly increase any of the biomarkers above clinical cut-off levels in any of the healthy participants. Considering the rarity of clinically manifest pemphigus, many healthy subjects need to be studied with the current study design. Alternatively, the expression of adhesion proteins or their adhesion function can be assessed in keratinocyte cell lines upon incubation with varying concentrations of pesticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":50376,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology Venereology & Leprology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/IJDVL_256_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The pathogenesis of pemphigus is multifactorial, and pesticides have been implicated as one of the triggering factors due to their interaction with acetylcholine receptors. Aim The aim of this study was to observe the effect of exposure to pesticides (by blood pesticide levels) on serological markers of pemphigus (anti-Dsg1, anti-Dsg3, and anti-M3 ACh receptor antibodies) amongst healthy individuals involved in pesticide use. Methods This was an observational, cross-sectional pilot study performed in Punjab. The study subjects were 45 couples (husband and wife) wherein the husband was involved in activities like spraying and handling pesticides, and the wife was considered a non-genetically related control (not occupationally exposed to pesticides). Clinical data were collected by a structured questionnaire, and venous blood was collected to test blood pesticide levels. Gas chromatography - mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were used for anti-Dsg-1, anti-Dsg-3, and anti-M3Ach receptor antibody level detection. Results Pesticides were detected in both husband and wife. There was no correlation between the duration of pesticide exposure and their blood levels. Chlorpyrifos was most frequently detected in husbands and β- endosulfan in wives. The levels of anti-Dsg-1 and anti-Dsg-3 titres were below the diagnostic cut-off values (20 RU/mL) for pemphigus in all participants. Husbands had significantly higher anti-Dsg3 values (p=0.029). There was no statistically significant association between the presence of pesticides and anti-Dsg-1, anti-Dsg-3, and anti-M3 ACh receptor antibodies in the sera. Anti-Dsg-1 antibodies had a significant positive correlation with chlorpyrifos serum levels (r= 0.3, p=0.005). Limitation Determining aspects like expression of adhesion proteins on keratinocyte cell lines, long term follow up of healthy subjects and correlation with pesticide levels with cases of pemphigus was not done as it is cost intensive. Conclusion The exposure to pesticides did not significantly increase any of the biomarkers above clinical cut-off levels in any of the healthy participants. Considering the rarity of clinically manifest pemphigus, many healthy subjects need to be studied with the current study design. Alternatively, the expression of adhesion proteins or their adhesion function can be assessed in keratinocyte cell lines upon incubation with varying concentrations of pesticides.

职业农药暴露与非职业农药暴露人群潜在天疱疮生物标志物抗粘粒蛋白抗体滴度与抗m3毒蕈碱乙酰胆碱受体抗体滴度的比较
天疱疮的发病机制是多因素的,农药由于与乙酰胆碱受体相互作用而被认为是触发因素之一。本研究的目的是观察农药暴露(通过血液农药水平)对使用农药的健康个体天疱疮血清学标志物(抗dsg1,抗dsg3和抗m3 ACh受体抗体)的影响。方法:这是一项在旁遮普进行的观察性横断面试点研究。研究对象是45对夫妇(丈夫和妻子),其中丈夫参与喷洒和处理杀虫剂等活动,妻子被认为是非遗传相关的对照(没有职业接触杀虫剂)。采用结构化问卷收集临床资料,并采集静脉血检测血液中农药残留量。采用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)和酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测抗dsg -1、抗dsg -3和抗m3ach受体抗体水平。结果夫妻双方均检出农药。接触农药的时间与他们的血液水平之间没有相关性。毒死蜱在丈夫中检出最多,β-硫丹在妻子中检出最多。所有参与者的抗dsg -1和抗dsg -3滴度水平均低于天疱疮的诊断临界值(20 RU/mL)。丈夫的抗dsg3值明显高于丈夫(p=0.029)。农药的存在与血清中抗dsg -1、抗dsg -3、抗m3乙酰胆碱受体抗体无统计学意义。抗dsg -1抗体与毒死蜱血清水平呈显著正相关(r= 0.3, p=0.005)。由于成本高昂,没有对角质细胞细胞系上粘附蛋白的表达、健康受试者的长期随访以及农药水平与天疱疮病例的相关性进行测定。结论暴露于农药没有显著增加任何健康参与者的高于临床临界值的生物标志物。考虑到临床上表现的天疱疮的罕见性,目前的研究设计需要对许多健康受试者进行研究。另外,在与不同浓度的杀虫剂孵育后,可以在角质细胞细胞系中评估粘附蛋白的表达或其粘附功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists & Leprologists (IADVL) is the national association of Indian medical specialists who manage patients with skin disorders, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) or leprosy. The current member strength of the association is about 3800. The association works for the betterment of the specialty by holding academic meetings, printing a journal and publishing a textbook. The IADVL has several state branches, each with their own office bearers, which function independently within the constitution of the IADVL. Established in 1940, the Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology (IJDVL, ISSN 0378-6323) is the official publication of the IADVL (Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信