Exploring the Feasibility of Using Smartphones for Measuring Sound-Level Difference as a Treatment Outcome.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Calvin Peter Baker, Anna Miles
{"title":"Exploring the Feasibility of Using Smartphones for Measuring Sound-Level Difference as a Treatment Outcome.","authors":"Calvin Peter Baker, Anna Miles","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the last decade, acoustic voice analysis using smartphones and freely downloadable apps has gained popularity. This observational study aimed to establish the feasibility of using uncalibrated smartphone devices with internal microphones as sound-level meters (SLMs) of voice in suboptimal clinical environments with ambient noise for sound-level difference measurement.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Four smartphones (two iPhones and two Androids) were tested against a Class 2 Casella SLM. Within-device consistency and linearity were tested across a range of synthesized tones and recorded sustained /a/ vowels, adjusting for app choice, microphone-to-source distance, sound type, intensity, frequency, and ambient noise level (< 30, < 50 dB). The strength of within-device test-retest reliability was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across devices, single dB values differed widely. Under all conditions, a strong linear relationship was seen across the Class 2 SLM and all smartphones (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .980). An increase in ambient noise from < 30 to < 50 dB did not affect the linearity of any of the tested devices (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .980). The test-retest reliability showed near-perfect linearity across measurement iterations and between devices, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> > .998, τ > .99. Measured differences between white noise tokens across all devices showed good agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) = .88.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Provided that internal linearity can be proven, uncalibrated smartphones demonstrate a feasible method of measuring pre-/posttreatment sound levels in sustained vowels provided that the device microphone-to-source distance and recording parameters (i.e., time and frequency weighting and application) are the same. Conversely, for absolute sound pressure level measurement, calibration with a gold standard SLM is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":49240,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"2342-2350"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJSLP-24-00538","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In the last decade, acoustic voice analysis using smartphones and freely downloadable apps has gained popularity. This observational study aimed to establish the feasibility of using uncalibrated smartphone devices with internal microphones as sound-level meters (SLMs) of voice in suboptimal clinical environments with ambient noise for sound-level difference measurement.

Method: Four smartphones (two iPhones and two Androids) were tested against a Class 2 Casella SLM. Within-device consistency and linearity were tested across a range of synthesized tones and recorded sustained /a/ vowels, adjusting for app choice, microphone-to-source distance, sound type, intensity, frequency, and ambient noise level (< 30, < 50 dB). The strength of within-device test-retest reliability was also assessed.

Results: Across devices, single dB values differed widely. Under all conditions, a strong linear relationship was seen across the Class 2 SLM and all smartphones (R2 > .980). An increase in ambient noise from < 30 to < 50 dB did not affect the linearity of any of the tested devices (R2 > .980). The test-retest reliability showed near-perfect linearity across measurement iterations and between devices, R2 > .998, τ > .99. Measured differences between white noise tokens across all devices showed good agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) = .88.

Conclusions: Provided that internal linearity can be proven, uncalibrated smartphones demonstrate a feasible method of measuring pre-/posttreatment sound levels in sustained vowels provided that the device microphone-to-source distance and recording parameters (i.e., time and frequency weighting and application) are the same. Conversely, for absolute sound pressure level measurement, calibration with a gold standard SLM is needed.

探索使用智能手机测量声级差作为治疗结果的可行性。
目的:在过去十年中,使用智能手机和免费下载的应用程序进行声学语音分析变得越来越流行。本观察性研究旨在确定在有环境噪声的次优临床环境中,使用内置麦克风的未经校准的智能手机设备作为语音声级计(SLMs)进行声级差测量的可行性。方法:对四部智能手机(两部iphone和两部android)进行了2类Casella SLM的测试。设备内的一致性和线性度在一系列合成音调和录制的持续/a/元音中进行测试,并根据应用程序选择、麦克风到声源的距离、声音类型、强度、频率和环境噪声水平(< 30,< 50 dB)进行调整。设备内测试-重测可靠性的强度也进行了评估。结果:不同设备的单dB值差异很大。在所有条件下,2类SLM和所有智能手机(R2 >.980)之间都存在很强的线性关系。环境噪声从< 30 dB增加到< 50 dB,不影响任何被测器件的线性度(R2 >.980)。测试-重测信度在测量迭代和器件之间呈现近乎完美的线性关系,R2 > 0.998, τ > 0.99。在所有设备上测量的白噪声标记之间的差异显示出良好的一致性,类内相关系数(2,1)= .88。结论:如果内部线性可以被证明,未经校准的智能手机展示了一种可行的方法来测量持续元音的预处理/后处理声级,前提是设备麦克风到声源的距离和记录参数(即时间和频率加权和应用)是相同的。相反,对于绝对声压级测量,则需要使用金标准SLM进行校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
353
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJSLP publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on all aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. The journal is an international outlet for clinical research pertaining to screening, detection, diagnosis, management, and outcomes of communication and swallowing disorders across the lifespan as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. Because of its clinical orientation, the journal disseminates research findings applicable to diverse aspects of clinical practice in speech-language pathology. AJSLP seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of speech-language pathology, including aphasia; apraxia of speech and childhood apraxia of speech; aural rehabilitation; augmentative and alternative communication; cognitive impairment; craniofacial disorders; dysarthria; fluency disorders; language disorders in children; speech sound disorders; swallowing, dysphagia, and feeding disorders; and voice disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信