Impact of Intraoperative Transfusion Volume on Length of Stay in Synostosis Repair.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Alexandra Giantini Larsen, Abhinav Pandey, Natasha Kharas, Michelle Buontempo, Jason Adelhoefer, Makayla Kochheiser, Alyssa B Valenti, Thomas A Imahiyerobo, Caitlin E Hoffman
{"title":"Impact of Intraoperative Transfusion Volume on Length of Stay in Synostosis Repair.","authors":"Alexandra Giantini Larsen, Abhinav Pandey, Natasha Kharas, Michelle Buontempo, Jason Adelhoefer, Makayla Kochheiser, Alyssa B Valenti, Thomas A Imahiyerobo, Caitlin E Hoffman","doi":"10.1177/10556656251352733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo examine the impact of intraoperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion status and volume on the length of stay (LOS) for patients undergoing open or endoscopic craniosynostosis repair.DesignRetrospective consecutive case series for craniosynostosis repair.SettingNewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) 2016 to 2024.Patients/ParticipantsA total of 232 patients undergoing craniosynostosis repair were included. Cases without vault remodeling or those considered non-standard/complex were excluded.InterventionEndoscopic or open craniosynostosis repair.Main Outcome MeasuresLOS, complications.ResultsOf 232 cases, 109 (47.0%) were treated with open cranial vault remodeling, and 123 (53.0%) underwent endoscopic suturectomy. Open cases had significantly higher blood loss, pRBC transfusion volume, TXA transfusion status and volume, and longer LOS (4.1 ± 4.0 days vs 1.2 ± 0.7 days). The transfusion rate was 58.7% in open cases versus 4.1% in endoscopic cases, with mean volumes of 27.9 ± 19.5 cc/kg and 17.3 ± 11.5 cc/kg, respectively. While transfusion status did not affect LOS in either cohort, multivariate linear regression, accounting for variables such as age, gender, weight, surgical approach, and case duration, found that transfusion volume independently predicted LOS. Patients with multiple sutural fusion generally had longer LOS than patients with singular sutural fusion.ConclusionsMinimizing transfusion volumes could reduce LOS, emphasizing the need for improved surgical planning and anesthetic strategies to reduce transfusion burden. This study's retrospective, single-center design limits its generalizability, necessitating prospective trials to standardize transfusion criteria and assess the impact of preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit's role in outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"10556656251352733"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656251352733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo examine the impact of intraoperative packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion status and volume on the length of stay (LOS) for patients undergoing open or endoscopic craniosynostosis repair.DesignRetrospective consecutive case series for craniosynostosis repair.SettingNewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) 2016 to 2024.Patients/ParticipantsA total of 232 patients undergoing craniosynostosis repair were included. Cases without vault remodeling or those considered non-standard/complex were excluded.InterventionEndoscopic or open craniosynostosis repair.Main Outcome MeasuresLOS, complications.ResultsOf 232 cases, 109 (47.0%) were treated with open cranial vault remodeling, and 123 (53.0%) underwent endoscopic suturectomy. Open cases had significantly higher blood loss, pRBC transfusion volume, TXA transfusion status and volume, and longer LOS (4.1 ± 4.0 days vs 1.2 ± 0.7 days). The transfusion rate was 58.7% in open cases versus 4.1% in endoscopic cases, with mean volumes of 27.9 ± 19.5 cc/kg and 17.3 ± 11.5 cc/kg, respectively. While transfusion status did not affect LOS in either cohort, multivariate linear regression, accounting for variables such as age, gender, weight, surgical approach, and case duration, found that transfusion volume independently predicted LOS. Patients with multiple sutural fusion generally had longer LOS than patients with singular sutural fusion.ConclusionsMinimizing transfusion volumes could reduce LOS, emphasizing the need for improved surgical planning and anesthetic strategies to reduce transfusion burden. This study's retrospective, single-center design limits its generalizability, necessitating prospective trials to standardize transfusion criteria and assess the impact of preoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit's role in outcomes.

术中输血量对缝合术住院时间的影响。
目的探讨术中填充红细胞(pRBC)输注状态和输注量对开放性或内窥镜下颅缝闭合修补术患者住院时间(LOS)的影响。设计回顾性连续颅缝闭合修复病例系列。纽约长老会/威尔康奈尔医学(WCM) 2016年至2024年。患者/参与者共纳入232例接受颅缝闭合修补术的患者。没有拱顶重塑或被认为是非标准/复杂的病例被排除在外。介入:内窥镜或开放性颅缝修补术。主要观察指标:los,并发症。结果232例患者中,109例(47.0%)行开放颅穹窿重构,123例(53.0%)行内镜下缝合切除术。开放病例的出血量、pRBC输注量、TXA输注状态和输注量均显著增加,LOS(4.1±4.0天vs 1.2±0.7天)更长。开腹手术输血率为58.7%,内镜下输血率为4.1%,平均输血量分别为27.9±19.5 cc/kg和17.3±11.5 cc/kg。虽然输血状态不影响两组患者的LOS,但考虑到年龄、性别、体重、手术方式和病例持续时间等变量的多元线性回归发现,输血量独立预测LOS。多路融合术患者的LOS一般比单路融合术患者长。结论减少输血量可以减少LOS,强调需要改进手术计划和麻醉策略以减轻输血负担。本研究的回顾性、单中心设计限制了其普遍性,需要前瞻性试验来标准化输血标准,并评估术前血红蛋白和红细胞压积对结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信