Use effectiveness of the symptothermal method to ameliorate unmet need for family planning in Kisumu County, Kenya.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Catherine E Igben-Pender, Peter Omemo, Gideon Ng'wena
{"title":"Use effectiveness of the symptothermal method to ameliorate unmet need for family planning in Kisumu County, Kenya.","authors":"Catherine E Igben-Pender, Peter Omemo, Gideon Ng'wena","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihaf072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the use effectiveness of the symptothermal method (STM) to ameliorate the unmet need for family planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study adopted a quasi-experimental design. A total of 260 women, comprising 136 STM users (interventional group) and 124 oral contraceptive pill (OCP) users (control group), were recruited. Intervention was conducted for 3 months with longitudinal monitoring for 12 months. Questionnaires, cycle charts and thermometers were used for data collection and data were analysed using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). To estimate the use effectiveness of STM vs OCPs, survival analysis of the Life table and Kaplan-Meier with log rank, was performed at 95% confidence interval (CI). To estimate the hazard ratio based on the effects of its covariates, a Cox proportional hazards model with 95% CI was applied. The Cox proportional hazards assumption was checked and four categorical covariates were adjusted for in the Cox model analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the STM group, no pregnancy occurred. Use effectiveness of STM for 12 months was 100%. For OCPs, three pregnancies occurred. The use effectiveness was 97-99% with failure of 1-2%. The Cox proportional hazards model had a hazard ratio of 0.01 (p=0.058), indicating that the risk of unintended pregnancy was lowered by 99% in STM users compared with OCP users. A p-value >0.05 indicated no significant difference between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that STM, when used correctly, is very effective in ameliorating the unmet need for family planning based on the World Health Organization's algorithm on STM effectiveness as an alternative to artificial contraceptive methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihaf072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the use effectiveness of the symptothermal method (STM) to ameliorate the unmet need for family planning.

Methods: The study adopted a quasi-experimental design. A total of 260 women, comprising 136 STM users (interventional group) and 124 oral contraceptive pill (OCP) users (control group), were recruited. Intervention was conducted for 3 months with longitudinal monitoring for 12 months. Questionnaires, cycle charts and thermometers were used for data collection and data were analysed using SPSS version 23 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). To estimate the use effectiveness of STM vs OCPs, survival analysis of the Life table and Kaplan-Meier with log rank, was performed at 95% confidence interval (CI). To estimate the hazard ratio based on the effects of its covariates, a Cox proportional hazards model with 95% CI was applied. The Cox proportional hazards assumption was checked and four categorical covariates were adjusted for in the Cox model analysis.

Results: In the STM group, no pregnancy occurred. Use effectiveness of STM for 12 months was 100%. For OCPs, three pregnancies occurred. The use effectiveness was 97-99% with failure of 1-2%. The Cox proportional hazards model had a hazard ratio of 0.01 (p=0.058), indicating that the risk of unintended pregnancy was lowered by 99% in STM users compared with OCP users. A p-value >0.05 indicated no significant difference between the two groups.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that STM, when used correctly, is very effective in ameliorating the unmet need for family planning based on the World Health Organization's algorithm on STM effectiveness as an alternative to artificial contraceptive methods.

利用对症热法的有效性改善肯尼亚基苏木县未满足的计划生育需求。
背景:本研究评估了对症热法(STM)在改善计划生育未满足需求方面的应用效果。方法:采用准实验设计。总共招募了260名妇女,其中包括136名STM使用者(干预组)和124名口服避孕药使用者(对照组)。干预3个月,纵向监测12个月。使用问卷调查、周期图和温度计收集数据,并使用SPSS version 23 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA)分析数据。为了估计STM与ocp的使用有效性,采用对数秩生命表和Kaplan-Meier生存分析,以95%置信区间(CI)进行。为了根据协变量的影响估计风险比,采用95% CI的Cox比例风险模型。对Cox比例风险假设进行检验,并对Cox模型分析中的四个分类协变量进行校正。结果:STM组未发生妊娠。STM治疗12个月有效率为100%。对于ocp,发生了三次怀孕。使用效率为97-99%,失败率为1-2%。Cox比例风险模型的风险比为0.01 (p=0.058),表明与OCP使用者相比,STM使用者意外怀孕的风险降低了99%。p值>0.05表示两组间差异无统计学意义。结论:我们的研究表明,根据世界卫生组织关于STM作为人工避孕方法替代品的有效性算法,如果使用得当,STM在改善未满足的计划生育需求方面非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信