Regional Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Adults: A Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes Using ACS NSQIP Data.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21514593251353114
Arissa M Torrie, Gerard P Slobogean, Rachel Johnson, Ron E Samet, Samuel M Galvagno, Robert V O'Toole, Nathan N O'Hara
{"title":"Regional Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Surgery in Older Adults: A Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes Using ACS NSQIP Data.","authors":"Arissa M Torrie, Gerard P Slobogean, Rachel Johnson, Ron E Samet, Samuel M Galvagno, Robert V O'Toole, Nathan N O'Hara","doi":"10.1177/21514593251353114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical fixation of hip fractures in older adults is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether regional anesthesia, which excluded epidural, spinal, or combined epidural-spinal, was associated with lower postoperative complication rates compared to general or spinal anesthesia in patients aged 50 years and older undergoing hip fracture surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Targeted Hip Fracture dataset from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching was used to compare regional anesthesia with general and spinal anesthesia. Given the NSQIP database excludes epidural, spinal, and combined epidural-spinal anesthesia from the regional classification, it was presumed that the remaining regional anesthesia patients received a peripheral nerve block. The primary outcome measure was a 30-day composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed 54,623 patients, from which 323 received regional anesthesia. These were separately matched with 323 cases of general anesthesia and 323 cases of spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of the primary composite outcome compared to both general anesthesia (3% vs 7%, risk ratio 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.6, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and spinal anesthesia (3% vs 7%, risk ratio 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.9, <i>P</i> = 0.01). A subgroup effect was detected, with high-risk patients (ASA IV-V) experiencing the greatest protective benefit from regional anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional anesthesia techniques, excluding epidural, spinal, or combined epidural-spinal techniques, were associated with lower rates of major postoperative complications in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery compared to general or spinal anesthesia. This benefit was more pronounced in high-risk patients. Our findings suggest that regional anesthesia, most likely administered via a peripheral nerve block, may offer benefits beyond pain control in this population, potentially improving postoperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":"16 ","pages":"21514593251353114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12206264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593251353114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical fixation of hip fractures in older adults is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether regional anesthesia, which excluded epidural, spinal, or combined epidural-spinal, was associated with lower postoperative complication rates compared to general or spinal anesthesia in patients aged 50 years and older undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Targeted Hip Fracture dataset from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2022. Propensity score matching was used to compare regional anesthesia with general and spinal anesthesia. Given the NSQIP database excludes epidural, spinal, and combined epidural-spinal anesthesia from the regional classification, it was presumed that the remaining regional anesthesia patients received a peripheral nerve block. The primary outcome measure was a 30-day composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Results: The study analyzed 54,623 patients, from which 323 received regional anesthesia. These were separately matched with 323 cases of general anesthesia and 323 cases of spinal anesthesia. Regional anesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of the primary composite outcome compared to both general anesthesia (3% vs 7%, risk ratio 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2 to 0.6, P < 0.001) and spinal anesthesia (3% vs 7%, risk ratio 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3 to 0.9, P = 0.01). A subgroup effect was detected, with high-risk patients (ASA IV-V) experiencing the greatest protective benefit from regional anesthesia.

Conclusions: Regional anesthesia techniques, excluding epidural, spinal, or combined epidural-spinal techniques, were associated with lower rates of major postoperative complications in older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery compared to general or spinal anesthesia. This benefit was more pronounced in high-risk patients. Our findings suggest that regional anesthesia, most likely administered via a peripheral nerve block, may offer benefits beyond pain control in this population, potentially improving postoperative outcomes.

区域麻醉用于老年人髋部骨折手术:使用ACS NSQIP数据的回顾性比较
老年人髋部骨折的手术固定与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。我们研究了在50岁及以上接受髋部骨折手术的患者中,区域麻醉(不包括硬膜外麻醉、脊髓麻醉或硬膜外-脊髓联合麻醉)与全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉相比是否与较低的术后并发症发生率相关。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间美国外科学会(ACS)国家手术质量改进计划(NSQIP)目标髋部骨折数据集。倾向评分匹配用于比较区域麻醉与全身麻醉和脊髓麻醉。考虑到NSQIP数据库将硬膜外麻醉、脊髓麻醉和硬膜外-脊髓联合麻醉排除在区域分类之外,我们推测其余的区域麻醉患者接受了周围神经阻滞。主要结局指标是30天内死亡、心肌梗死或中风的综合情况。结果:本研究共分析54,623例患者,其中323例接受了区域麻醉。这些分别与323例全身麻醉和323例脊髓麻醉相匹配。与全麻(3% vs 7%,风险比0.3,95% CI: 0.2 ~ 0.6, P < 0.001)和脊髓麻醉(3% vs 7%,风险比0.5,95% CI: 0.3 ~ 0.9, P = 0.01)相比,区域麻醉的主要综合结局发生率较低。检测到亚组效应,高危患者(ASA IV-V)从区域麻醉中获得最大的保护益处。结论:与全身麻醉或脊髓麻醉相比,区域麻醉技术(不包括硬膜外麻醉、脊髓麻醉或硬膜外-脊髓联合麻醉)可降低老年人髋部骨折手术后主要并发症的发生率。这种益处在高危患者中更为明显。我们的研究结果表明,区域麻醉,最有可能通过周围神经阻滞给药,可能在这一人群中提供疼痛控制以外的益处,可能改善术后预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信