Cognitive Load and Challenges in Self-regulation: An Introduction and Reflection on the Topical Collection.

IF 10.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Educational Psychology Review Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-27 DOI:10.1007/s10648-025-10042-2
Anique B H de Bruin, Eva M Janssen, Julia Waldeyer, Ferdinand Stebner
{"title":"Cognitive Load and Challenges in Self-regulation: An Introduction and Reflection on the Topical Collection.","authors":"Anique B H de Bruin, Eva M Janssen, Julia Waldeyer, Ferdinand Stebner","doi":"10.1007/s10648-025-10042-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effort monitoring and regulation (EMR) model integrates self-regulated learning and cognitive load theory to examine how students monitor, regulate, and optimize effort during learning. Since its introduction in 2020, it has inspired research that explores how to correct learners' misinterpretations of effort and metacognitive biases and how instructional interventions can improve learning strategies. The current topical collection titled <i>Cognitive Load: Challenges in Self-regulation</i> includes seven empirical papers, two review papers, one meta-analysis, and a discussion paper. These contributions build on the EMR model by testing its assumptions, linking it to motivation, and refining our understanding of the basis of effort ratings in learning. Among other findings, the findings in the topical collection (1) show that feedback valence can affect participants' perceived task effort and their willingness to invest effort via feelings of challenge and threat, (2) provide the first evidence of far metacognitive transfer, and (3) propose a novel categorization of effort based on the underlying psychological sources when experiencing and allocating mental effort. In this editorial introduction, we summarize the topical collection papers, connect their findings to the EMR model, and finally reflect on how these novel insights can further develop the model.</p>","PeriodicalId":48344,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology Review","volume":"37 3","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12204937/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10042-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effort monitoring and regulation (EMR) model integrates self-regulated learning and cognitive load theory to examine how students monitor, regulate, and optimize effort during learning. Since its introduction in 2020, it has inspired research that explores how to correct learners' misinterpretations of effort and metacognitive biases and how instructional interventions can improve learning strategies. The current topical collection titled Cognitive Load: Challenges in Self-regulation includes seven empirical papers, two review papers, one meta-analysis, and a discussion paper. These contributions build on the EMR model by testing its assumptions, linking it to motivation, and refining our understanding of the basis of effort ratings in learning. Among other findings, the findings in the topical collection (1) show that feedback valence can affect participants' perceived task effort and their willingness to invest effort via feelings of challenge and threat, (2) provide the first evidence of far metacognitive transfer, and (3) propose a novel categorization of effort based on the underlying psychological sources when experiencing and allocating mental effort. In this editorial introduction, we summarize the topical collection papers, connect their findings to the EMR model, and finally reflect on how these novel insights can further develop the model.

自我调节中的认知负荷与挑战:专题文集的介绍与反思。
努力监测和调节(EMR)模型整合了自我调节学习和认知负荷理论,研究学生在学习过程中如何监测、调节和优化努力。自2020年推出以来,它激发了一些研究,探索如何纠正学习者对努力和元认知偏见的误解,以及教学干预如何改善学习策略。当前题为“认知负荷:自我调节的挑战”的专题合集包括七篇实证论文,两篇综述论文,一篇元分析论文和一篇讨论论文。这些贡献建立在EMR模型的基础上,通过测试其假设,将其与动机联系起来,并改进我们对学习中努力评级基础的理解。本研究发现:(1)反馈效价可以通过挑战感和威胁感影响被试的任务努力感知和投入意愿;(2)首次提供远元认知迁移的证据;(3)提出了一种新的基于心理源的努力分类方法。在这篇社论导论中,我们总结了主题收集论文,将他们的发现与EMR模型联系起来,最后反思了这些新颖的见解如何进一步发展该模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Educational Psychology Review aims to disseminate knowledge and promote dialogue within the field of educational psychology. It serves as a platform for the publication of various types of articles, including peer-reviewed integrative reviews, special thematic issues, reflections on previous research or new research directions, interviews, and research-based advice for practitioners. The journal caters to a diverse readership, ranging from generalists in educational psychology to experts in specific areas of the discipline. The content offers a comprehensive coverage of topics and provides in-depth information to meet the needs of both specialized researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信